Literature DB >> 26537922

How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries?

D De Neubourg1, K Bogaerts2, C Blockeel3, T Coetsier4, A Delvigne5, F Devreker6, M Dubois7, N Gillain8, S Gordts9, C Wyns10.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How do the national cumulative (multiple) live birth rates over complete assisted reproduction technology (ART) courses of treatment per woman in Belgium compare to those in other registries? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) remain high with a low cumulative multiple live birth rate when compared with other registries and publications. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In ART, a reduction in the multiple live birth rate could be achieved by reducing the number of embryos transferred. It has been shown that by doing so, live birth rates per cycle were maintained, particularly when the augmentation effect of attached frozen-thawed cycles was considered. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective cohort study included all patients with a Belgian national insurance number who were registered in the national ART registry (Belrap) and who started a first fresh ART cycle between 1 July 2009 until 31 December 2011 with follow up until 31 December 2012. We analysed 12 869 patients and 38 008 cycles (both fresh and attached frozen cycles). PARTICIPANTS, MATERIALS, SETTINGS,
METHODS: CLBRs per patient who started a first ART cycle including fresh and consecutive frozen cycles leading to a live birth. Conservative estimates of cumulative live birth assumed that patients who did not return for treatment had no chance of achieving an ART-related live birth, whereas optimal estimates assumed that women discontinuing treatment would have the same chance of achieving a live birth as those continuing treatment. A maximum of six fresh ART cycles with corresponding frozen cycles was investigated and compared with other registries and publications. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: The CLBR was age dependent and declined from 62.9% for women <35 years, to 51.4% for women 35-37 years, to 34.1% for women 38-40 years and 17.7% for women 41-42 years in the conservative analysis after six cycles. In the optimal estimate, the CLBR declined from 85.9% for women <35 years, to 72.0% for women 35-37 years, to 50.4% for women 38-40 years and 36.4% for women 41-42 years. The cumulative multiple live birth rates for the whole population were 5.1 and 8.6% for the conservative and optimal estimate, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Conservative and optimal estimates use assumptions for the whole ART population and do not take the individual patient into account. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: These data reinforce the validity of the Belgian model of coupling reimbursement of ART costs to a restriction in the number of embryos transferred. Our data can improve decision-making in medical ART practice both on the patient level and for society at large and could provide health care takers and insurance companies with a valid model. STUDY FUNDING COMPETING INTERESTS: none.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproduction technology; conservative estimate; cumulative live birth rate; cumulative multiple live birth rate; optimal estimate; registry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26537922     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

Review 1.  The Limitation of Randomized Control Trials on the Influence of Acupuncture and In Vitro Fertilization: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Yuhsi Wang; Xiaoxiong Shen; Yue-Fen Hu; Robyn Sodders
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2022-02-14

2.  The cumulative live birth rate of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alfa verse urinary human follicle-stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Chunxia Yang; Naijun Dong; Feng Li; Yurong Ji; Yu Pan; Hong She
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.506

3.  ART in Europe, 2018: results generated from European registries by ESHRE.

Authors:  C Wyns; C De Geyter; C Calhaz-Jorge; M S Kupka; T Motrenko; J Smeenk; C Bergh; A Tandler-Schneider; I A Rugescu; V Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 4.  IVF and IUI in couples with unexplained infertility (FIIX study): study protocol of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucy Prentice; Lynn Sadler; Sarah Lensen; Melissa Vercoe; Jack Wilkinson; Richard Edlin; Georgina M Chambers; Cynthia M Farquhar
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-09-22

5.  Live Birth Rate Comparison Between Single vs. Double Ovary Women With Assisted Reproduction: A Single Tertiary Center Study.

Authors:  Ghadeer L Aljahdali; Fatimah A Alkhaldi; Sarah F Almujarri; Haifa F Alsadhan; Amirah S Yaqoub; Jawaher A Alsahabi; Nazish Masud; Afaf A Felemban
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-06

6.  ART in Europe, 2017: results generated from European registries by ESHRE.

Authors:  C Wyns; Ch De Geyter; C Calhaz-Jorge; M S Kupka; T Motrenko; J Smeenk; C Bergh; A Tandler-Schneider; I A Rugescu; S Vidakovic; V Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-08-05

7.  Effectiveness of a mobile preconception lifestyle programme in couples undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF): the protocol for the PreLiFe randomised controlled trial (PreLiFe-RCT).

Authors:  Tessy Boedt; Eline Dancet; Sharon Lie Fong; Karen Peeraer; Diane De Neubourg; Sofie Pelckmans; Arne van de Vijver; Jan Seghers; Katleen Van der Gucht; Ben Van Calster; Carl Spiessens; Christophe Matthys
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Improved clinical outcomes after non-invasive oocyte selection and Day 3 eSET in ICSI patients.

Authors:  Inge Van Vaerenbergh; Tom Adriaenssens; Wim Coucke; Lisbet Van Landuyt; Greta Verheyen; Michaël De Brucker; Michel Camus; Peter Platteau; Michel De Vos; Elien Van Hecke; André Rosenthal; Johan Smitz
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  20 years of the European IVF-monitoring Consortium registry: what have we learned? A comparison with registries from two other regions.

Authors:  Ch De Geyter; C Wyns; C Calhaz-Jorge; J de Mouzon; A P Ferraretti; M Kupka; A Nyboe Andersen; K G Nygren; V Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Independent Variables for Determining the Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Aged Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome or Tubal Factor Infertility: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yichun Guan; Pingping Kong; Zhiying Xiao; Junyan Zhang; Jingfang He; Wenjun Geng; Junfang Yan; Simin Sun; Mingkun Mu; Xiaofang Du; Xingling Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.