Literature DB >> 26537749

Mesophyll conductance plays a central role in leaf functioning of Oleaceae species exposed to contrasting sunlight irradiance.

Alessio Fini1, Francesco Loreto2, Massimiliano Tattini3, Cristiana Giordano4, Francesco Ferrini1, Cecilia Brunetti1,5, Mauro Centritto5.   

Abstract

The ability to modify mesophyll conductance (gm ) in response to changes in irradiance may be a component of the acclimation of plants to shade-sun transitions, thus influencing species-specific distributions along light-gradients, and the ecological niches for the different species. To test this hypothesis we grew three woody species of the Oleaceae family, the evergreen Phillyrea latifolia (sun-requiring), the deciduous Fraxinus ornus (facultative sun-requiring) and the hemi-deciduous Ligustrum vulgare (shade tolerant) at 30 or 100% sunlight irradiance. We show that neither mesophyll conductance calculated with combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence techniques (gm) nor CO2 assimilation significantly varied in F. ornus because of sunlight irradiance. This corroborates previous suggestions that species with high plasticity for light requirements, do not need to undertake extensive reorganization of leaf conductances to CO2 diffusion to adapt to different light environments. On the other hand, gm steeply declined in L. vulgare and increased in P. latifolia exposed to full-sun conditions. In these two species, leaf anatomical traits are in part responsible for light-driven changes in gm , as revealed by the correlation between gm and mesophyll conductance estimated by anatomical parameters (gmA). Nonetheless, gm was greatly overestimated by gmA when leaf metabolism was impaired because of severe light stress. We show that gm is maximum at the light intensity at which plant species have evolved and we conclude that gm actually plays a key role in the sun and shade adaptation of Mediterranean species. The limits of gmA in predicting mesophyll conductance are also highlighted.
© 2015 Scandinavian Plant Physiology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26537749     DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Plant        ISSN: 0031-9317            Impact factor:   4.500


  6 in total

1.  Anatomical and diffusional determinants inside leaves explain the difference in photosynthetic capacity between Cypripedium and Paphiopedilum, Orchidaceae.

Authors:  Zhong-Hui Yang; Wei Huang; Qiu-Yun Yang; Wei Chang; Shi-Bao Zhang
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Extremely thick cell walls and low mesophyll conductance: welcome to the world of ancient living!

Authors:  Linda-Liisa Veromann-Jürgenson; Tiina Tosens; Lauri Laanisto; Ülo Niinemets
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  A Comparison of the Variable J and Carbon-Isotopic Composition of Sugars Methods to Assess Mesophyll Conductance from the Leaf to the Canopy Scale in Drought-Stressed Cherry.

Authors:  Giovanni Marino; Matthew Haworth; Andrea Scartazza; Roberto Tognetti; Mauro Centritto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Species-specific variation of photosynthesis and mesophyll conductance to ozone and drought in three Mediterranean oaks.

Authors:  Yasutomo Hoshika; Elena Paoletti; Mauro Centritto; Marcos Thiago Gaudio Gomes; Jaime Puértolas; Matthew Haworth
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Acclimation responses of macaw palm seedlings to contrasting light environments.

Authors:  Adriel N Dias; Advanio I Siqueira-Silva; João P Souza; Kacilda N Kuki; Eduardo G Pereira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Leaf plasticity across wet and dry seasons in Croton blanchetianus (Euphorbiaceae) at a tropical dry forest.

Authors:  Keila Rêgo Mendes; Willian Batista-Silva; Jaqueline Dias-Pereira; Marcos P S Pereira; Eliane V Souza; José E Serrão; João A A Granja; Eugênia C Pereira; David J Gallacher; Pedro R Mutti; Duany T C da Silva; Rogério S de Souza Júnior; Gabriel B Costa; Bergson G Bezerra; Cláudio M Santos E Silva; Marcelo F Pompelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.