| Literature DB >> 26537720 |
Pritam Kumar Mankapure1, Suresh Ramchandra Barpande1, Jyoti Dilip Bhavthankar1, Manda Mandale1.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Detection of abnormally elevated levels of molecules in patients with oral cancer may be useful in early diagnosis. These markers can be included in current Histopathology grading and in TNM staging systems of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) to make it more efficient. Several pro-angiogenic molecules have been assessed for the same reason. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a vasoactive peptide associated with the development and spread of many solid tumors, including Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), but its utility in OSCC has not been confirmed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26537720 PMCID: PMC4621942 DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720150125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Oral Sci ISSN: 1678-7757 Impact factor: 2.698
Comparison of clinico pathologic variables of OSCC cases with serum big ET-1 levels
| Clinicopathologic variables | No. of patients | Mean serum big ET-1 levels in pg/ml (Mean±SD) | Value of p | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| 21-30 | 2 (5%) | 4.23±1.01 | 0.6064 | not significant |
| 31-40 | 7 (18%) | 4.41±0.62 | ||
| 41-50 | 9 (22.5%) | 4.35±0.53 | ||
| 51-60 | 5 (12.5%) | 4.08±0.26 | ||
| 61-70 | 14 (35%) | 4.76±0.92 | ||
| 71-80 | 3 (7%) | 4.50±1.37 | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 26 (65%) | 4.35±0.80 | 0.1734 | not significant |
| Female | 14 (35%) | 4.70±0.68 | ||
| Anatomic Site | ||||
| Alveolar mucosa | 13 (32.5%) | 4.35±0.82 | 0.063 | not significant |
| Buccal mucosa | 8 (20%) | 4.83±0.65 | ||
| Tongue | 6 (15%) | 3.81±0.54 | ||
| GB complex | 6 (15%) | 4.85±0.58 | ||
| Palate | 2 (5%) | 4.74±0.62 | ||
| Multifocal | 2 (5%) | 5.12±0.49 | ||
| Clinical Staging | ||||
| Stage I | 3 (7.5%) | 2.81±0.23 | <0.001 | highly significant |
| Stage II | 7 (17.5%) | 3.72±0.22 | ||
| Stage III | 13 (32.5%) | 4.47±0.40 | ||
| Stage IV | 17 (42.5%) | 5.07±0.40 | ||
| Histopathological Grading | ||||
| Grade I | 36 (90%) | 4.40±0.77 | 0.727 | not significant |
| Grade II | 4 (10%) | 5.12±0.18 |
Figure 1Comparison of mean levels of big ET-1 between oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cases and controls using independent t-test. * means p<0.0001 in comparison with healthy controls
Figure 2Intergroup and intragroup comparison of mean levels of big ET-1 among clinical stages of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cases using one way ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple comparison test respectively (* p<0.05; **p<0.01; and ***p<0.001)
Figure 3Comparison of mean levels of big ET-1 among histopathological grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cases using independent t-test