Literature DB >> 26537163

Incidence Trends in the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in Sweden Since 1958.

Julia Rockberg1, Bruce A Bach2, Justyna Amelio3, Rohini K Hernandez4, Patrik Sobocki1, Jacob Engellau5, Henrik C F Bauer6, Alexander Liede7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Swedish Cancer Registry (founded in 1958) constitutes a unique resource for epidemiological studies of giant cell tumor of bone with potential for use for population-based studies of incidence over time. The aim of this study was to provide what we believe is the first modern population-based assessment of the incidence trends of giant cell tumor, a unique osteoclastogenic lytic stromal tumor with both benign and malignant histological forms, and to compare the findings with data from the same registry on osteosarcoma, a tumor that may display similar histological characteristics.
METHODS: Cases were identified with use of codes for pathological bone tumor (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-7 196). Specific morphological coding distinguishes benign (PAD 741) from malignant giant cell tumor (PAD 746) and osteosarcoma (PAD 766).
RESULTS: During the period of 1958 to 2011, 4625 bone tumors were reported, including 505 giant cell tumors (383 benign and 122 malignant) and 1152 osteosarcomas. From 1958 to 1982 the ratio of malignant to benign giant cell tumors was 1.3, whereas from 1983 to 2011 the ratio inverted to 0.09, suggesting a change in the reporting or diagnosis of malignant or benign cases. Cases of giant cell tumor diagnosed from 1983 to 2011 displayed an age and sex distribution (median age at diagnosis, 34.0 years; 54% female) that were consistent with those in large published case series but differed from those in 1958 to 1982 (median age at diagnosis, 31.5 years; 48% female). The most current data (1983 to 2011) showed the giant cell tumor incidence in Sweden to be 1.3 per million per year, while the osteosarcoma incidence was 2.3 per million per year.
CONCLUSIONS: Early Swedish Cancer Registry data (1958 to 1982) revealed a higher proportion of malignant giant cell tumors than seen in large sequential case series and a distinct age and sex profile compared with more recent data (1983 to 2011). This likely represents changes in the diagnostic workup and introduction of multidisciplinary review of giant-cell-containing tumors around 1982. Recent data may reflect the impact of expert centralized biopsy and multidisciplinary case review and more comprehensive reporting of benign giant cell tumors.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26537163     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

Review 1.  Primary subacute epiphyseal osteomyelitis caused by Mycobacterium species in young children: a modern diagnostic approach.

Authors:  N El Houmami; P Minodier; C Bouvier; H Seligmann; J-L Jouve; D Raoult; P-E Fournier
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Giant cell tumor of the thoracic spine causing acute paraplegia-a case report.

Authors:  Christopher Lucasti; Dil Patel; Bradley Hawayek; Mark Maraschiello; Joseph Kowalski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06

3.  Sex Differences in the Recurrence Rate and Risk Factors for Primary Giant Cell Tumors Around the Knee in China.

Authors:  Yongcheng Hu; Liming Zhao; Huilin Zhang; Xiuchun Yu; Zhen Wang; Zhaoming Ye; Sujia Wu; Shibing Guo; Guochuan Zhang; Jinghua Wang; Xianjia Ning
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Total en bloc spondylectomy of the eleventh thoracic vertebra following denosumab therapy for the treatment of a giant cell tumor.

Authors:  Gen Inoue; Takayuki Imura; Masayuki Miyagi; Wataru Saito; Ryo Tazawa; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Malignant Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Risk Nomogram Analysis Based on the Population.

Authors:  Xiaolong Zhu; Runzhi Huang; Peng Hu; Penghui Yan; Suna Zhai; Jie Zhang; Junwei Zhuang; Huabin Yin; Tong Meng; Daoke Yang; Zongqiang Huang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-02-17

6.  Surgery methods and soft tissue extension are the potential risk factors of local recurrence in giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Dongqi Li; Jinlei Zhang; Yi Li; Junfeng Xia; Yihao Yang; Mingyan Ren; Yedan Liao; Shunling Yu; Xiaojuan Li; Yan Shen; Ya Zhang; Zuozhang Yang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Soft tissue recurrence of giant cell tumor of the bone: Prevalence and radiographic features.

Authors:  Leilei Xu; Jing Jin; Annan Hu; Jin Xiong; Dongmei Wang; Qi Sun; Shoufeng Wang
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.072

8.  Epidemiology of benign giant cell tumor of bone in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Alexander Liede; Rohini K Hernandez; En-Tzu Tang; Chuang Li; Brian Bennett; Steven S Wong; Danielle Jandial
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.072

9.  Denosumab for Effective Tumor Size Reduction in Patients With Giant Cell Tumors of the Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Josef Yayan
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.302

10.  Characteristics of Benign and Malignant Bone Tumors Registered in the Hiroshima Tumor Tissue Registry, 1973-2012.

Authors:  Hiromi Sugiyama; Kunihiro Omonishi; Shuji Yonehara; Kotaro Ozasa; Hiroki Kajihara; Takafumi Tsuya; Yukio Takeshima
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.