Literature DB >> 26536141

Evaluation of a novel portable x-ray fluorescence screening tool for detection of arsenic exposure.

David J McIver1, John A VanLeeuwen, Anthony L Knafla, Jillian A Campbell, Kevin M Alexander, Mihai R Gherase, Judith R Guernsey, David E B Fleming.   

Abstract

A new portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF) screening tool was evaluated for its effectiveness in arsenic (As) quantification in human finger and toe nails ([Formula: see text]). Nail samples were measured for total As concentration by XRF and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), kappa, diagnostic sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp), and linear regression analyses, the concentration of As measured by XRF was compared to ICP-MS. The CCC peaked for scaled values of fingernail samples, at 0.424 (95% CI: 0.065-0.784). The largest kappa value, 0.400 (95% CI:  -0.282-1.000), was found at a 1.3 μg g(-1) cut-off concentration, for fingernails only, and the largest kappa at a clinically relevant cut-off concentration of 1.0 μg g(-1) was 0.237 (95% CI:  -0.068-0.543), again in fingernails. Analyses generally showed excellent XRF Sn (up to 100%, 95% CI: 48-100%), but low Sp (up to 30% for the same analysis, 95% CI: 14-50%). Portable XRF shows some potential for use as a screening tool with fingernail samples. The difference between XRF and ICP-MS measurements decreased as sample mass increased to 30 mg. While this novel method of As detection in nails has shown relatively high agreement in some scenarios, this portable XRF is not currently considered suitable as a substitute for ICP-MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26536141     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/12/2443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  3 in total

1.  Quantification of manganese and mercury in toenail in vivo using portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF).

Authors:  Xinxin Zhang; Aaron J Specht; Marc G Weisskopf; Jennifer Weuve; Linda H Nie
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 2.  Toenails as a biomarker of exposure to arsenic: A review.

Authors:  Antonio J Signes-Pastor; Enrique Gutiérrez-González; Miguel García-Villarino; Francisco D Rodríguez-Cabrera; Jorge J López-Moreno; Elena Varea-Jiménez; Roberto Pastor-Barriuso; Marina Pollán; Ana Navas-Acien; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Validation of in vivo toenail measurements of manganese and mercury using a portable X-ray fluorescence device.

Authors:  Jennifer Weuve; Linda H Nie; Marc G Weisskopf; Aaron J Specht; Xinxin Zhang; Anna Young; Vy T Nguyen; David C Christiani; Diana M Ceballos; Joseph G Allen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.563

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.