Literature DB >> 26535863

Development of a Health Professions Education Research-Specific Institutional Review Board Template.

Stephen D DeMeo1, Alisa Nagler, Mitchell T Heflin.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: Health professions education (HPE) has become a core component of the mission of academic health centers (AHCs) nationwide. The volume of HPE research projects being reviewed has increased, presenting new challenges for institutional review boards (IRBs). As HPE research becomes increasingly sophisticated in its design and methods, IRBs and researchers alike have a duty to better understand its unique characteristics. Researchers must be better able to conceptualize and describe their research to IRBs, and IRBs should be able to provide timely review and assure protection of research subjects (or participants). APPROACH: The creation of HPE research-specific IRB templates may be one way to improve the interactions between education researchers and IRBs. This report describes the development and early implementation of an HPE research-specific IRB template at Duke University from 2013 to 2014. OUTCOMES: Early adopters have noted increased ease of preparation and submission, while IRB staff have reported improved proposal clarity and more attention to protecting learners as research participants. Focus during educational or training sessions about the new template has shifted-from merely a description of the new submission process to a more comprehensive education series that includes discussion of regulatory definitions, examination of case studies, and opportunity for audience feedback. NEXT STEPS: Continued collection of quantitative and qualitative data regarding the implementation of this IRB template will help its developers more precisely describe its effects on HPE research projects. Formalizing and streamlining the interactions between HPE researchers and IRBs is an important goal for all AHCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26535863     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  4 in total

1.  Harvest the Low-Hanging Fruit: Strategies for Submitting Educational Innovations for Publication.

Authors:  Rebecca D Blanchard; Alisa Nagler; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-09

2.  Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Roses and Balances: A Paradigm for Constructive Ethical Review of Health Professions Education Research.

Authors:  Tim Schutte; Fedde Scheele; Scheltus van Luijk
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-05-25

4.  Health Professions Education Research and the Institutional Review Board.

Authors:  Mitchell T Heflin; Stephen DeMeo; Alisa Nagler; Marilyn J Hockenberry
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.082

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.