Literature DB >> 26535008

The mode of agonist binding to a G protein-coupled receptor switches the effect that voltage changes have on signaling.

Andreas Rinne1, Juan Carlos Mobarec2, Martyn Mahaut-Smith3, Peter Kolb2, Moritz Bünemann4.   

Abstract

Signaling by many heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is either enhanced or attenuated by changes in plasma membrane potential. To identify structural correlates of the voltage sensitivity of GPCR signaling, we chose muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (the M1, M3, and M5 isoforms) as a model system. We combined molecular docking analysis with Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assays that monitored receptor activity under voltage clamp conditions. When human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells expressing the individual receptors were stimulated with the agonist carbachol, membrane depolarization enhanced signaling by the M1 receptor but attenuated signaling by the M3 and M5 receptors. Furthermore, whether membrane depolarization enhanced or inhibited receptor signaling depended on the type of agonist. Membrane depolarization attenuated M3 receptor signaling when the receptor was bound to carbachol or acetylcholine, whereas depolarization enhanced signaling when the receptor was bound to either choline or pilocarpine. Docking calculations predicted that there were two distinct binding modes for these ligands, which were associated with the effect of depolarization on receptor function. From these calculations, we identified a residue in the M3 receptor that, when mutated, would alter the binding mode of carbachol to resemble that of pilocarpine in silico. Introduction of this mutated M3 receptor into cells confirmed that the membrane depolarization enhanced, rather than attenuated, signaling by the carbachol-bound receptor. Together, these data suggest that the directionality of the voltage sensitivity of GPCR signaling is defined by the specific binding mode of each ligand to the receptor.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26535008     DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aac7419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Signal        ISSN: 1945-0877            Impact factor:   8.192


  21 in total

1.  A Novel Voltage Sensor in the Orthosteric Binding Site of the M2 Muscarinic Receptor.

Authors:  Ofra Barchad-Avitzur; Michael F Priest; Noa Dekel; Francisco Bezanilla; Hanna Parnas; Yair Ben-Chaim
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Microscopic Characterization of Membrane Transporter Function by In Silico Modeling and Simulation.

Authors:  J V Vermaas; N Trebesch; C G Mayne; S Thangapandian; M Shekhar; P Mahinthichaichan; J L Baylon; T Jiang; Y Wang; M P Muller; E Shinn; Z Zhao; P-C Wen; E Tajkhorshid
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  G protein-coupled receptors of class A harness the energy of membrane potential to increase their sensitivity and selectivity.

Authors:  Daria N Shalaeva; Dmitry A Cherepanov; Michael Y Galperin; Gert Vriend; Armen Y Mulkidjanian
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 4.  Harnessing Ion-Binding Sites for GPCR Pharmacology.

Authors:  Barbara Zarzycka; Saheem A Zaidi; Bryan L Roth; Vsevolod Katritch
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  The voltage-sensitive cardiac M2 muscarinic receptor modulates the inward rectification of the G protein-coupled, ACh-gated K+ current.

Authors:  Pedro D Salazar-Fajardo; Iván A Aréchiga-Figueroa; Ana Laura López-Serrano; Julio C Rodriguez-Elias; Javier Alamilla; José A Sánchez-Chapula; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; Ricardo A Navarro-Polanco; Eloy G Moreno-Galindo
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  A unifying hypothesis for M1 muscarinic receptor signalling in pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Sameera Dasari; Corey Hill; Allan T Gulledge
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The agonist-specific voltage dependence of M2 muscarinic receptors modulates the deactivation of the acetylcholine-gated K(+) current (I KACh).

Authors:  Eloy G Moreno-Galindo; Javier Alamilla; José A Sanchez-Chapula; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; Ricardo A Navarro-Polanco
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Intracellular Transfer of Na+ in an Active-State G-Protein-Coupled Receptor.

Authors:  Owen N Vickery; Catarina A Carvalheda; Saheem A Zaidi; Andrei V Pisliakov; Vsevolod Katritch; Ulrich Zachariae
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  KCa channel activation normalizes endothelial function in Type 2 Diabetic resistance arteries by improving intracellular Ca2+ mobilization.

Authors:  Ramesh C Mishra; Barry D Kyle; Dylan J Kendrick; Daniyil Svystonyuk; Teresa M Kieser; Paul W M Fedak; Heike Wulff; Andrew P Braun
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 10.  Measuring Absolute Membrane Potential Across Space and Time.

Authors:  Julia R Lazzari-Dean; Anneliese M M Gest; Evan W Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 12.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.