Adam M Chaker1, Mohamed H Shamji2, Florentina A Dumitru3, Moises A Calderon3, Guy W Scadding3, Melina Makatsori3, Ieuan Jones4, Qiuling A He4, Kulandayan K Subramanian4, Jonathan P Arm4, Stephen R Durham2, Carsten B Schmidt-Weber5. 1. Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), Technische Universität and Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Otolaryngology, Allergy Section, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany. 2. Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Immunomodulation and Tolerance group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom. 4. Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Mass, and Basel, Switzerland. 5. Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), Technische Universität and Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: csweber@tum.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy is currently the only disease-modifying treatment available for allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the induction of sustained tolerance to allergen when anti-IL-4 was combined with a suboptimal course of grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) using the allergen-induced skin late-phase response (LPR) and exploratory immune monitoring as surrogate markers of therapeutic response. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 3-group parallel design trial, 37 participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis received suboptimal SCIT (30,000 standardized quality units) in combination with anti-IL-4 (VAK694) and suboptimal SCIT (30,000 standardized quality units) plus placebo antibody or double placebo (placebo SCIT and placebo antibody) restricted to 13 weeks before the grass pollen season. The primary end point was the size of the LPR at 12 months. Exploratory end points included measures of the immunomodulatory activity of treatment by using IL-4 and IL-10 FluoroSpot assays, flow cytometry of T cells, and measurement of IgE, IgG4, and facilitated antigen binding. RESULTS: Both active treatment arms led to a substantial and sustained reduction of the LPR with no additional suppression with addition of anti-IL-4. Treatment with anti-IL-4 and SCIT compared with SCIT alone led to a sustained reduction in allergen-specific IL-4-producing cell counts (P < .01). Both active treatment arms led to induction of dual IL-4/IL-10-producing cells during the pollen season. CONCLUSION: The combination of anti-IL-4 with SCIT provided no additional benefit over SCIT alone in suppressing the allergen-induced skin LPR. A larger trial is needed to assess whether the observed ex vivo downregulation of TH2 responses might translate into clinical benefit.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy is currently the only disease-modifying treatment available for allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the induction of sustained tolerance to allergen when anti-IL-4 was combined with a suboptimal course of grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) using the allergen-induced skin late-phase response (LPR) and exploratory immune monitoring as surrogate markers of therapeutic response. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 3-group parallel design trial, 37 participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis received suboptimal SCIT (30,000 standardized quality units) in combination with anti-IL-4 (VAK694) and suboptimal SCIT (30,000 standardized quality units) plus placebo antibody or double placebo (placebo SCIT and placebo antibody) restricted to 13 weeks before the grass pollen season. The primary end point was the size of the LPR at 12 months. Exploratory end points included measures of the immunomodulatory activity of treatment by using IL-4 and IL-10 FluoroSpot assays, flow cytometry of T cells, and measurement of IgE, IgG4, and facilitated antigen binding. RESULTS: Both active treatment arms led to a substantial and sustained reduction of the LPR with no additional suppression with addition of anti-IL-4. Treatment with anti-IL-4 and SCIT compared with SCIT alone led to a sustained reduction in allergen-specific IL-4-producing cell counts (P < .01). Both active treatment arms led to induction of dual IL-4/IL-10-producing cells during the pollen season. CONCLUSION: The combination of anti-IL-4 with SCIT provided no additional benefit over SCIT alone in suppressing the allergen-induced skin LPR. A larger trial is needed to assess whether the observed ex vivo downregulation of TH2 responses might translate into clinical benefit.
Authors: Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Oliver Pfaar; Tobias Ankermann; Matthias Augustin; Petra Bubel; Sebastian Böing; Randolf Brehler; Peter A Eng; Peter J Fischer; Michael Gerstlauer; Eckard Hamelmann; Thilo Jakob; Jörg Kleine-Tebbe; Matthias Volkmar Kopp; Susanne Lau; Norbert Mülleneisen; Christoph Müller; Katja Nemat; Wolfgang Pfützner; Joachim Saloga; Klaus Strömer; Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier; Antje Schuster; Gunter Johannes Sturm; Christian Taube; Zsolt Szépfalusi; Christian Vogelberg; Martin Wagenmann; Wolfgang Wehrmann; Thomas Werfel; Stefan Wöhrl; Margitta Worm; Bettina Wedi; Susanne Kaul; Vera Mahler; Anja Schwalfenberg Journal: Allergol Select Date: 2022-09-06
Authors: Oliver Pfaar; Francesca Gehrt; Hansen Li; Stefan A Rudhart; Alexander Nastev; Boris A Stuck; Stephan Hoch Journal: Allergol Select Date: 2021-02-24
Authors: M A Calderon; P Demoly; T Casale; C A Akdis; C Bachert; M Bewick; B M Bilò; B Bohle; S Bonini; A Bush; D P Caimmi; G W Canonica; V Cardona; A M Chiriac; L Cox; A Custovic; F De Blay; P Devillier; A Didier; G Di Lorenzo; G Du Toit; S R Durham; P Eng; A Fiocchi; A T Fox; R Gerth van Wijk; R M Gomez; T Haathela; S Halken; P W Hellings; L Jacobsen; J Just; L K Tanno; J Kleine-Tebbe; L Klimek; E F Knol; P Kuna; D E Larenas-Linnemann; A Linneberg; M Matricardi; H J Malling; R Moesges; J Mullol; A Muraro; N Papadopoulos; G Passalacqua; E Pastorello; O Pfaar; D Price; P Rodriguez Del Rio; R Ruëff; B Samolinski; G K Scadding; G Senti; M H Shamji; A Sheikh; J C Sisul; D Sole; G J Sturm; A Tabar; R Van Ree; M T Ventura; C Vidal; E M Varga; M Worm; T Zuberbier; J Bousquet Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Ulrich M Zissler; Constanze A Jakwerth; Ferdinand M Guerth; Lisa Pechtold; Juan Antonio Aguilar-Pimentel; Katharina Dietz; Kathrin Suttner; Guido Piontek; Bernhard Haller; Zuzana Hajdu; Matthias Schiemann; Carsten B Schmidt-Weber; Adam M Chaker Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 8.143