| Literature DB >> 26531310 |
Jasmin B Kuemmerle-Deschner1, Assen Koitschev2, Pascal N Tyrrell3, Stefan K Plontke4, Norbert Deschner5, Sandra Hansmann6, Katharina Ummenhofer7, Peter Lohse8, Christiane Koitschev9, Susanne M Benseler10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Muckle-Wells-syndrome (MWS) is an autoinflammatory disease characterized by systemic and organ-specific inflammation due to excessive interleukin (IL)-1 release. Inner ear inflammation results in irreversible sensorineural hearing loss, if untreated. Early recognition and therapy may prevent deafness. The aims of the study were to characterize the spectrum of hearing loss, optimize the otologic assessment for early disease and determine responsiveness to anti-IL-1-therapy regarding hearing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26531310 PMCID: PMC4632838 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-015-0041-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ISSN: 1546-0096 Impact factor: 3.054
Fig. 1World Health Organization (WHO) definition of functional disability associated with hearing loss and frequencies of daily noises. The graph depicts common sources of noises including their frequencies and loudness. The WHO definition defines five severity grades of hearing impairment based on the 4PTA of the patient’s better ear. 4PTA captures the most relevant frequencies for speech discrimination at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. Hearing impairment grades II to IV are considered disabling. Profound hearing impairment constitutes deafness.
Demographic, clinical and laboratory findings and characteristic patterns of hearing loss in patients with Muckle-Wells syndrome (MWS)
| Patients | |
|---|---|
| N = 23 | |
| Demographics | |
| Median age at diagnosis of MWS [years] (range) | 18 (3–72) |
| Children ≤18 years at diagnosis (%) | 12 (52) |
| Females (%) | 15 (65) |
| NLRP3 mutation | |
| • c.937G>A (p.Glu313Lys) (%) | 14 (61) |
| • c.1049C>T (p.Thr350Met) (%) | 5 (22) |
| • c.598G>A (p.Val200Met) (%) | 4 (17) |
| Overall disease activity | |
| Median MWS-DAS at baseline (range) | 8 (6–16) |
| Laboratory markers | |
| Mean SAA at baseline in mg/l (std), (nl* <1) | 6.87 (1.43) |
| Mean CRP at baseline in mg/l (std), (nl* <0.05) | 0.22 (0.17) |
| Treatment | |
| IL-1 Inhibition (%) | 23/23 (100) |
| Anakinra (%) | 10 (43) |
| Canakinumab (%) | 13 (57) |
*nl: normal value
Fig. 2Variation of hearing thresholds across ages and frequencies in patients with Muckle-Wells syndrome (MWS). a Comparison of hearing threshold within a family with MWS. Audiogram of a 5 year-old child with MWS (a-1): Standard hearing assessment in the 4PTA range including 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz was normal (light gray area). In contrast the proposed HF-PTA captured a dramatic early high frequency hearing loss with increased hearing thresholds at 6 and 8 kHz (dark grey area). The child’s 37-year old father reported hearing impairment. The corresponding audiogram (a-11) revealed abnormally increased hearing thresholds across all frequencies (light and dark grey areas). In the father advanced MWS associated hearing loss is captured not only by HF-PTA but also by standard 4PTA. b Comparison of hearing thresholds of standard 4 pure-tone-average (4PTA) and proposed high frequency pure-tone-average (HF-PTA) in children and adults with MWS and age-matched healthy controls across the age spectrum. Normal hearing thresholds captured in 4PTA and HF-PTA increase with age (4PTA grey line, HF-PTA black line). MWS patients of all ages have significantly higher 4PTAs (black circles) and HF-PTAs (grey triangles) even after adjusting for age-specific normal hearing thresholds
Audiologic findings in a cohort of pediatric and adult MWS patients at baseline and following treatment with anti-IL-1-therapy utilizing the standard 4PTA and the proposed high frequency (HF-PTA) instrument
| Patients N = 23 | |
|---|---|
| Assessments (ears) N = 46 | |
| Hearing loss at baseline | |
| Patients with clinical hearing loss (%) | 21/23 (91) |
| Ears (assessments) with hearing loss (total) (%) | 42/46 (91) |
| Adults with hearing loss (%) | 11/11 (100) |
| • Abnormal assessments (adults) (%) | 22/22 (100) |
| Children with hearing loss (%) | 10/12 (83) |
| •Abnormal assessments (children) (%) | 20/24 (83) |
| Hearing thresholds at baseline | |
| 4-frequency pure tone average (4PTA), median (range)* | 28 (0–72) |
| Number of abnormal 4PTA assessments (%)* | 34/46 (74) |
| •Adult assessments with abnormal 4PTA (%) | 22/22 (100) |
| •Pediatric assessments with abnormal 4PTA (%) | 12/24 (50) |
| High Frequency HF-PTA median (range)* | 45 (0–114) |
| Abnormal HF-PTA hearing assessments (%) | 42/46 (91) |
| •Adult assessments with abnormal HF-PTA (%) | 22/22 (100) |
| •Pediatric assessments with abnormal HF-PTA (%) | 20/24 (83) |
| Hearing thresholds at last follow-up | |
| 4 Pure Tone Average (4PTA); median (range)* | 26 (0–56) |
| Abnormal 4PTA assessments (%) | 34/46 (74) |
| High Frequency HF-PTA; median (range)* | 43 (0–114) |
| Abnormal HF-PTA assessments (%) | 42/46 (83) |
| Sensitivity of hearing assessments | |
| Detection of clinical hearing loss by 4PTA | 81 % |
| Detection of clinical hearing loss by HF-PTA | 100 % |
* Each patient is represented twice, since each ear had a separate hearing assessment; all values are adjusted for age (Additional files 1 and 2: Tables S1 and S2)
Fig. 3Effect of anti-IL-1 therapy on hearing assessments in patients with MWS. a Comparison of two different anti-IL-1 therapy regimens. A total of 11 assessments (ears) of 9 patients improved with anti-IL1 therapy; 4/9 were children, five were adults. None of the patients had worsening of the contralateral ear. Improvement occurred with both treatment regimens. All but two patients with hearing improvement were females. Overall, worsening was exclusively observed in adult patients, a male and a female. Both patients had received anakinra therapy. b Responsiveness to change: Comparison between 4PTA and HF-PTA follow-up assessments after exposure to anti-IL-1 therapy. 4PTA and HF-PTA was calculated in all MWS patients following anti-IL-1 therapy. Hearing improved in five children and six adults, most commonly captured by HF-PTA (10/11), either by HF-PTA only (5/10, light grey bars) or also by the standard 4PTA (5/10, medium grey bars). Hence, a total of 91 % of improved assessments were detected by HF-PTA, while just in one patient improvement was detected by standard 4PTA only. Worsening was not documented in children, but deteriorated in two adults. In both, this was detected by standard 4PTA, in one also in the HF-PTA