Literature DB >> 26530644

Putting the baby back in the bathwater: the interpretation of randomised trials in surgery.

R Gandhi1, A V Perruccio2, S Kakar3, F S Haddad4.   

Abstract

Recently, several high impact randomised controlled trials have been published suggesting no greater benefit from orthopaedic surgery over conservative treatment, or limited surgical intervention. These studies can have profound effects on clinical practice, leading to the abandonment of previously widely-used operations. How do surgeons who believe these operations are beneficial over conservative treatment rationalise these findings, and justify their use with hospital administrators and health care funders who require evidence for the value and efficacy of surgical treatment? ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Keywords:  randomised trials; outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26530644     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.36981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  3 in total

1.  Arthroscopic meniscal surgery: a national society treatment guideline and consensus statement.

Authors:  S G F Abram; D J Beard; A J Price
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures: a current concepts review.

Authors:  Mandeep S Dhillon; Sharad Prabhakar
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-10-16

3.  Adverse outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a study of 700 000 procedures in the national Hospital Episode Statistics database for England.

Authors:  Simon G F Abram; Andrew Judge; David J Beard; Andrew J Price
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.