| Literature DB >> 26530342 |
Millena G Bittencourt1, Saleema Kherani2, Daniel A Ferraz3, Mehreen Ansari4, Humzah Nasir5, Yasir J Sepah6, Mostafa Hanout7, Diana V Do8, Quan Dong Nguyen9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Choroidal thickness (CTh) and choroidal vessel diameter (VD) in the Haler's layer were evaluated as markers of inflammatory insult in non-infectious uveitis (NIU). Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis®, Heidelberg Engineering Inc.) scans were acquired from 23 normal subjects (39 eyes - group 1), 7 subjects with high myopia (14 eyes - group 2), and 19 patients with NIU (23 eyes - group 3). In groups 1 and 2, CTh and VD were measured at 3 different points of the same horizontal OCT scan passing through the fovea and a mean calculated. Mean CTh and VD were calculated in 2 other locations, 2 mm superior and inferior from the chosen foveal horizontal scan. In group 3, three measurements of CTh and VD were obtained within 1 mm of a horizontal scan passing through a retinal lesion; mean CTh and VD were then computed. A ratio (R) between the VD and the corresponding CTh was calculated.Entities:
Keywords: Choroidal inflammatory disease; Choroidal thickness; Non-infectious uveitis and white dot syndrome; Optical coherence tomography
Year: 2014 PMID: 26530342 PMCID: PMC4884007 DOI: 10.1186/s12348-014-0014-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect ISSN: 1869-5760
Figure 1Measurement algorithm. Measurement algorithm in the OCT of a normal subject. A: VD measurement 1, B: CTh measurement 1, C: VD measurement 2, D: CTh measurement 2, E: VD measurement 3, F: CTh measurement 3
Characteristics of study subjects
| Age | Gender | Ethnicity | Refractive error | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years | SD | Male | Female | C | AF | A | Spherical equivalent | SD | ||
| Group 1 | 39 | 29.6 | 7.4 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 4 | 17 | −1.8 | 1.40 |
| Group 2 | 14 | 29.1 | 8.7 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8 | −7.3 | 2.60 |
| Group 3 | 23 | 45.9 | 14.4 | 7 | 16 | 19 | 3 | 1 | −4.68 | 4.00 |
| MFC | 8 | 44.4 | 8.5 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | −5.54 | 3.50 |
| PIC | 4 | 33.6 | 3.3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | −8.86 | 2.30 |
| AZOOR | 3 | 56.0 | 20.7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | −1.16 | 0.28 |
| BSCR | 6 | 63.8 | 9.0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | −1.30 | 3.00 |
| VKH | 1 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −3.00 | 0.00 |
| SC | 1 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −1.00 | 0.00 |
Group 1: normal subjects; group 2: highly myopic subjects; group 3: subjects with non-infectious uveitis, multifocal choroiditis (MFC), punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC), acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR), birdshot choroidoretinopathy (BSCR), Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome (VKH), serpiginous choroiditis (SC). C, Caucasian; AF, African; A, Asian.
Choroidal thickness, vessel diameter, and ratio characteristics
| Choroidal thickness (μm) | Vessel vertical diameter (μm) | Ratio | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SE | 95% CI | Mean | SE | 95% CI | Mean | SE | 95% CI | ||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Group 1 | 261.6 | 4.5 | 253.1 | 271.3 | 159.8 | 3.2 | 154.0 | 166.2 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 0.59 | 0.65 |
| Group 2 | 260.2 | 7.8 | 244.5 | 275.5 | 163.2 | 5.1 | 152.9 | 174.1 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.64 |
| Group 3 | 193.6 | 8.5 | 176.9 | 213.3 | 123.6 | 5.8 | 111.7 | 135.5 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.67 |
| MFC | 187.7 | 10.4 | 165.3 | 210.0 | 123.1 | 8.8 | 104.2 | 142.0 | 0.65 | 0.02 | 0.6 | 0.69 |
| PIC | 198.4 | 16.9 | 159.3 | 237.5 | 127.6 | 11.5 | 101.0 | 154.3 | 0.64 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.70 |
| AZOOR | 318.8 | 18.2 | 240.2 | 397.3 | 177.3 | 13.5 | 119.1 | 235.5 | 0.55 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.74 |
| BSCR | 160.4 | 7.1 | 143.8 | 177.1 | 98.2 | 8.9 | 77.5 | 118.9 | 0.61 | 0.04 | 0.51 | 0.71 |
| VKH | 192.5 | 3.5 | 148.0 | 236.9 | 130.5 | 26.5 | 104.0 | 157.0 | 0.68 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 0.83 |
| SC | 183.2 | 66.2 | 117.0 | 249.5 | 137.5 | 45.5 | 92.0 | 183.1 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.79 |
Group 1: normal subjects; group 2: highly myopic subjects; group 3: subjects with non-infectious uveitis, multifocal choroiditis (MFC), punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC), acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR), birdshot choroidoretinopathy (BSCR), Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome (VKH), serpiginous choroiditis (SC).
Choroidal thickness, vessel diameter, and ratio characteristics according to location in the fovea
| Locations | Normal subjects | Highly myopic subjects | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD | ||
| Mean CTh | Foveal | 39 | 242.8 | 37.5 | 14 | 248.1 | 42.0 |
| Supra-foveal | 32 | 271.8 | 50.4 | 14 | 273.1 | 58.6 | |
| Infra-foveal | 30 | 275.3 | 43.0 | 14 | 259.6 | 50.7 | |
| Mean VD | Foveal | 39 | 148.5 | 28.1 | 14 | 152.6 | 26.9 |
| Supra-foveal | 32 | 173.9 | 36.8 | 14 | 174.8 | 37.0 | |
| Infra-foveal | 30 | 159.5 | 26.6 | 14 | 162.4 | 33.5 | |
| Mean ratio | Foveal | 39 | 0.614 | 0.086 | 14 | 0.618 | 0.055 |
| Supra-foveal | 32 | 0.660 | 0.242 | 14 | 0.644 | 0.059 | |
| Infra-foveal | 30 | 0.582 | 0.150 | 14 | 0.628 | 0.065 | |
Supra-foveal is defined as 2 mm superiorly to the fovea; infra-foveal is defined as 2 mm inferiorly to the fovea.
Choroidal thickness, vessel diameter, and ratio characteristics according to comparison of locations in the fovea
| Comparison of locations | Normal subjects | Highly myopic subjects | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean difference | 95% CI | Mean difference | 95% CI | ||||||
| Lower bound | Upper bound | Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||
| Mean CTh | Foveal × supra-foveal | −27.9 | −47.5 | −8.4 | 0.006 | −25.0 | −64.4 | 14.4 | 0.206 |
| Foveal × infra-foveal | −30.6 | −50.6 | −10.6 | 0.003 | −11.5 | −50.9 | 27.9 | 0.557 | |
| Supra-7foveal × infra-foveal | −2.7 | −23.5 | 18.2 | 0.800 | 13.5 | −25.9 | 52.9 | 0.492 | |
| Mean VD | Foveal × supra-foveal | −25.1 | −39.6 | −10.5 | 0.001 | −22.2 | −47.6 | 3.2 | 0.085 |
| Foveal × infra-foveal | −10.5 | −25.3 | 4.3 | 0.162 | −9.8 | −35.1 | 15.6 | 0.440 | |
| Supra-foveal × infra-foveal | 14.6 | −0.9 | 30.1 | 0.065 | 12.4 | −13.0 | 37.8 | 0.328 | |
| Mean ratio | Foveal × supra-foveal | −0.048 | −0.119 | 0.022 | 0.176 | 0.026 | −0.026 | −0.026 | 0.253 |
| Foveal × infra-foveal | 0.028 | −0.044 | 0.100 | 0.446 | 0.016 | −0.010 | −0.010 | 0.482 | |
| Supra-foveal × infra-foveal | 0.076 | 0.001 | 0.151 | 0.057 | −0.016 | −0.062 | 0.030 | 0.482 | |
Supra-foveal is defined as 2 mm superiorly to the fovea; infra-foveal is defined as 2 mm inferiorly to the fovea.
Association of different co-factors with choroidal thickness and vessel diameter
| Choroidal thickness (μm) | Vessel vertical diameter (μm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | Effect | |||
| Age (⬆ 1 year) | −1.7 |
| −0.98 |
|
| Refractive error (⬇ 1 D) | 3.6 |
| 0.85 | 0.390 |
| Gender (M) | 18.9 |
| 8.18 | 0.100 |
| Ethnicity | - | 0.22 | - | 0.666 |
D, diopter, M, male.
Group comparisons
| Choroidal thickness (μm) | Vessel vertical diameter (μm) | Ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Difference | Difference | Difference | ||||
| Group 1 vs. group 2a | 18.84 | 0.29 | −8.1 | 0.92 | 0.029 | 1.00 |
| Group 1 vs. group 3a | 31.3 |
| 17.96 | 0.07 | 0.006 | 1.00 |
| Group 2 vs. group 3a | 50.2 |
| 26.0 |
| −0.023 | 0.31 |
aMultivariate model using age and refractive error as covariates (age = 33.16 and Rx = −3.7). Bonferroni test was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.
Figure 2Group choroidal thickness and vessel diameter intervals. Choroidal thickness and vessel diameter intervals showing the difference between group 1 and group3 and between group 2 and group 3.
Figure 3Non-infectious uveitis choroidal thickness and vessel diameter intervals. Choroidal thickness and vessel diameter intervals for different entities of non-infectious uveitis (NIU), showing the differences among AZOOR and other diagnosis.
Figure 4Patient with birdshot retinochoroidopathy. Spectral domain OCT of the left eye of a patient with birdshot retinochoroidopathy. The infrared SLO images (A to C) show the location of the horizontal b-scan. The correspondent b-scans show the vessel diameter and the choroidal thickness below the different lesions.
Comparisons between NIU diagnoses
| Choroidal thickness (μm) | Vessel vertical diameter (μm) | Ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among NIUa | ||||||
| Pair-wise comparisonb |
|
|
| |||
| MFC vs. PIC | −0.48 | 0.63 | −0.28 | 0.80 | −0.05 | 0.97 |
| MFC vs. AZOOR | −2.66 | 0.01 | −2.23 | 0.02 | −1.67 | 0.10 |
| MFC vs. BSCR | −1.41 | 0.16 | −1.72 | 0.08 | −0.45 | 0.67 |
| PIC vs. AZOOR | −2.49 | 0.01 | −1.75 | 0.07 | −1.57 | 0.11 |
| PIC vs. BSCR | −1.76 | 0.07 | −2.16 | 0.03 | −0.30 | 0.75 |
| AZOOR vs. BSCR | −2.50 | 0.01 | −2.50 | 0.01 | −1.20 | 0.22 |
aKruskal-Wallis test; bMann-Whitney test. VKH and SC were not used for comparison due to the small number of subjects enrolled (1).