Literature DB >> 26529370

Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm (MISSION trial-NCT02324595): a feasibility study.

Salvatore Gueli Alletti1, Carolina Bottoni2, Francesco Fanfani3, Valerio Gallotta2, Vito Chiantera4, Barbara Costantini2, Francesco Cosentino2, Alfredo Ercoli5, Giovanni Scambia2, Anna Fagotti6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has acquired an increasing role in the management of ovarian cancer. Laparoscopic cytoreduction could represent a new frontier for selected patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess feasibility and early complication rate of minimally invasive (MI) interval debulking surgery (IDS) in stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients after NACT. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a phase II multicentric study in advanced EOC cases with clinical complete response after NACT, according to Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria. Institutional review board approval was obtained and all patients signed written informed consent to be included in the protocol. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02324595) and was named "MISSION" trial. For patients meeting inclusion criteria, surgical procedures started with diagnostic laparoscopy to confirm preoperative findings and assess surgical complexity. MI-IDS included hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, appendectomy, omentectomy, peritonectomy, and bowel resection. Pelvic and/or aortic lymphadenectomy was not considered as standard procedure in these cases. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, time to restart chemotherapy, survival rate, and quality of life data were registered.
RESULTS: From December 2013 through February 2015, of 184 advanced EOC patients considered eligible for IDS, 52 (28.2%) met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. For 22 (12%) of them, standard laparotomic approach was preferred because of intraoperative surgeon evaluation. Thirty (16.3%) patients received the planned treatment of MI-IDS. Median age was 61 (range 39-81) years and median body mass index was 24 (range 20-31) kg/m(2). Median numbers of NACT cycles was 4 (range 3-7). Median operative time was 285 (range 124-418) minutes and median estimated blood loss was 100 (range 50-200) mL. Surgical procedures included 28 (93.3%) hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 29 (96.6%) omentectomy, 2 (6.6%) appendectomy, 11 (36.6%) regional peritonectomy, and 1 (3.4%) bowel resection. A residual tumor of 0 cm was reached in 29 (96.6%) patients and 0.5 cm in only 1 (3.4%) case. The vast majority of patients were discharged on postoperative day 2 (range 2-3). No early postoperative complications were registered. Median time to restart chemotherapy was 20 (10-30) days and all patients successfully completed the cycles. Histological findings showed 3 (10%) complete response, 9 (30%) microscopic residual disease, and 18 (60%) evidence of macroscopic residual disease. With a median follow-up of 10.5 month, 5 peritoneal and 2 lymph nodal recurrences were observed. Psychometric test revealed moderate discomfort in the vast majority of patients (66.7%). All patients are still alive.
CONCLUSION: Invasive-IDS in patients with clinically complete response to NACT seems to be feasible and safe in terms of perioperative outcomes, psycho-oncological impact, and survival rate. The equivalence between MI surgery and laparotomy needs to be confirmed with a longer follow-up and a larger number of patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advanced ovarian cancer; interval debulking surgery; laparoscopic cytoreduction; minimally invasive surgery; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26529370     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of optimal cytoreduction in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Time to incorporate laparoscopic assessment into the standard of care.

Authors:  Natalia Rodriguez Gómez-Hidalgo; Bertha Alejandra Martinez-Cannon; Alpa M Nick; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  The new classifications of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and their clinical implications.

Authors:  L R Duska; E C Kohn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Survival and Surgical Approach among Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Christianne Persenaire; Adam Pyrzak; Emma L Barber
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 4.  Current Recommendations for Minimally Invasive Surgical Staging in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Federica Perelli; Luigi Pedone; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

5.  Laparoscopic cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant ChEmotherapy (LANCE).

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Alexander Melamed; Giovanni Scambia; Rene Pareja; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez; Anna Fagotti
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Microscopic diseases remain in initial disseminated sites after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Shinichi Tate; Kyoko Nishikimi; Kazuyoshi Kato; Ayumu Matsuoka; Michiyo Kambe; Takako Kiyokawa; Makio Shozu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  A Prediction Model for Optimal Primary Debulking Surgery Based on Preoperative Computed Tomography Scans and Clinical Factors in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yu Gu; Meng Qin; Ying Jin; Jing Zuo; Ning Li; Ce Bian; Yu Zhang; Rong Li; Yu-Mei Wu; Chun-Yan Wang; Ke-Qiang Zhang; Ying Yue; Ling-Ying Wu; Ling-Ya Pan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts.

Authors:  Huamao Liang; Hongyan Guo; Chunyu Zhang; FuLi Zhu; Yu Wu; Kun Zhang; Hua Li; Jinsong Han
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-03

9.  Robotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Semiramis L Carbajal-Mamani; David Schweer; Merry J Markham; Ashwini K Esnakula; Joseph R Grajo; Jacqueline C Castagno; Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-02-10

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic debulking surgery for recurrent adult granulosa cell tumors.

Authors:  Jolijn W Groeneweg; Joline F Roze; Wouter B Veldhuis; Jelle P Ruurda; Cornelis G Gerestein; Ronald P Zweemer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.