Undesirable side effects associated with orthosteric agonists/antagonists of cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R), a tractable target for treating several pathologies affecting humans, have greatly limited their translational potential. Recent discovery of CB1R negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) has renewed interest in CB1R by offering a potentially safer therapeutic avenue. To elucidate the CB1R allosteric binding motif and thereby facilitate rational drug discovery, we report the synthesis and biochemical characterization of first covalent ligands designed to bind irreversibly to the CB1R allosteric site. Either an electrophilic or a photoactivatable group was introduced at key positions of two classical CB1R NAMs: Org27569 (1) and PSNCBAM-1 (2). Among these, 20 (GAT100) emerged as the most potent NAM in functional assays, did not exhibit inverse agonism, and behaved as a robust positive allosteric modulator of binding of orthosteric agonist CP55,940. This novel covalent probe can serve as a useful tool for characterizing CB1R allosteric ligand-binding motifs.
Undesirable side effects associated with orthosteric agonists/antagonists of cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R), a tractable target for treating several pathologies affecting humans, have greatly limited their translational potential. Recent discovery of CB1R negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) has renewed interest in CB1R by offering a potentially safer therapeutic avenue. To elucidate the CB1R allosteric binding motif and thereby facilitate rational drug discovery, we report the synthesis and biochemical characterization of first covalent ligands designed to bind irreversibly to the CB1R allosteric site. Either an electrophilic or a photoactivatable group was introduced at key positions of two classical CB1R NAMs: Org27569 (1) and PSNCBAM-1 (2). Among these, 20 (GAT100) emerged as the most potent NAM in functional assays, did not exhibit inverse agonism, and behaved as a robust positive allosteric modulator of binding of orthosteric agonist CP55,940. This novel covalent probe can serve as a useful tool for characterizing CB1R allosteric ligand-binding motifs.
Constituents of the endocannabinoid biosignaling
system include two principal cannabinoid G-protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs) 1 and 2 (CB1R and CB2R, respectively), their main endogenous
cannabinergic ligands (anandamide, AEA; 2-arachidonoylglycerol, 2-AG),
and enzymes responsible for endocannabinoid biosynthesis and inactivation.[1−4] Expressed in various peripheral tissues, CB1R is the most abundant
class-A GPCR in brain.[5,6] CB1R-mediated signaling helps
regulate many important physiological functions including learning,
memory, and cognition, nociception, cardiovascular function, reproduction,
and neuronal development. Dysregulated CB1R activity has been implicated
in the pathogenesis of disease states related to these and other physiological
processes such that small-molecule modulators of CB1R-mediated signaling
are considered to have therapeutic potential.[1,3] On
the other hand, CB2R is mainly expressed in peripheral tissues, particularly
immune cells[7,8] as well as CNS microglia[9] and has been pursued for treating pain and inflammation.[10−17] In the past two decades, structurally diverse, potent, and selective
CB1R orthosteric agonists have been identified with (pre)clinical
efficacy in treating nausea, emesis, and multiple sclerosis and managing
glaucoma, pain, and inflammatory disorders.[18−20] Their salutary
effects notwithstanding, CB1R orthosteric agonists have been associated
with adverse events including mood alteration (euphoria, anxiety,
panic), acute psychoses, and impaired cognition and motor performance,
which limit their clinical utility.[21] Several
CB1R-selective antagonists/inverse agonists have also emerged as potential
drugs for cardiometabolic diseases and nicotine- and alcohol-use disorders.
Reminiscent of CB1R orthosteric agonists, however, therapeutic application
of CB1R orthosteric antagonists/inverse agonists is severely restricted
by the potential for unacceptable psychotropic side effects including
depression, social aversion, and suicidal ideation.[3,21−25]As has been demonstrated for several other class-A GPCRs,
CB1R has allosteric sites spatially distinct from the orthosteric
ligand-binding pocket, and allosteric modulators with CB1R selectivity
vs CB2R have been identified.[26−29] Engagement of CB1R by allosteric modulators is believed
to induce a conformational change in the receptor that may be difficult
to achieve with orthosteric ligands alone and “fine-tune”
the pharmacological activity of the orthosteric ligand.[30−32] Due to their generally enhanced CB1R selectivity, reduced inter-receptor
promiscuity, and higher-resolution functional control of receptor
information transmission, CB1R allosteric modulators are anticipated
to offer several therapeutic advantages over orthosteric ligands.Exemplars of well-studied, structurally distinct CB1R-selective allosteric
ligands are shown in Figure . These include 5-chloro-3-ethyl-N-(4-(piperidin-1-yl)phenethyl)-1H-indole-2-carboxamide (1, Org27569)[26] and 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(3-(6-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pyridine-2-yl)phenyl)urea
(2, PSNCBAM-1),[27] two CB1R
allosteric modulators that emerged from initial structure–activity
relationship (SAR) studies on high-throughput screening (HTS) leads.
Although 1 and 2 exhibit several characteristic
properties of allosteric modulators, they elicit markedly divergent
effects on the affinity and efficacy of the standard cannabinoid-receptor
orthosteric ligand 2-[(1R,2R,5R)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexyl]-5-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)phenol
(CP55,940). Compounds 1 and 2 behave as
both a positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of CP55,940 binding affinity
and a negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of CP55,940 signaling efficacy
and potency. Additionally, endogenous CB1R allosteric modulators have
been identified and characterized. The nonclassical eicosanoid (5S,6R,7E,9E,11Z,13E,15S)-5,6,15-trihydroxyicosa-7,9,11,13-tetraenoic
acid (3, lipoxin A4), whose traditional biological target
is the formyl peptide receptor FPR1, was also shown to function as
CB1R PAM of orthosteric ligand binding and adenylyl cyclase activity.[28] The endogenous steroid 1-((3S,8S,9S,10R,13S,14S,17R)-3-hydroxy-10,12,13-trimethyl-2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-tetradecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl)ethan-1-one
(4, pregnenolone) acts as a CB1R NAM functionally (CB1R-mediated
ERK1/2 phosphorylation) without any effect on orthosteric agonist
binding affinity.[29] The dopamine transport
inhibitor RTI-371[33] and the PPAR-α
agonist fenofibrate have also been suggested to act at a CB1R allosteric
site.[34] Very recently, we have shown that
cannabidiol, the nonpsychoactive constituent of Cannabis sativa, exhibits negative allosteric modulation at CB1R.[35] Additionally, ligands displaying positive allosteric modulation
of orthosteric ligand’s binding and function have been reported
recently.[36,37] These collective findings substantiate the
existence and functional significance of allosteric sites on CB1R
whose pharmacological modulation of endogenous/orthosteric ligand
activity could be exploited for therapeutic ends.
Figure 1
Representative CB1R allosteric
modulators reported in the literature.
Representative CB1R allosteric
modulators reported in the literature.Although it has been a decade since the first CB1 NAM (1) was reported, no new CB1 NAM with improved potency/efficacy
has been identified that has been studied in vivo. To date, very limited
in vivo studies with 1 and 2 have been reported
where these NAMs have shown moderate efficacy.[27,38−40] Another major limitation associated with these two
compounds is that they exhibit CB1R inverse agonism in addition to
having NAM activity.[26,41,42] For establishing therapeutic utility of CB1 NAMs, there is a need
for developing potent and efficacious CB1R NAMs that lack inverse
agonism so as to avoid related side effects.To inform rational
drug design aimed at therapeutic CB1R allosteric modulation, it is
critical to expand our currently limited knowledge of the structural
properties and functional influence of the receptor’s allosteric
ligand-binding site(s). Although candidate atomic-level interactions
involved in GPCR ligand recognition and functionally productive engagement
can be extrapolated from ligand–receptor cocrystals, a CB1R
crystal structure has remained elusive, and its inherently static
nature precludes direct observation of structure–function correlates
of CB1R (allosteric) ligands. Although homology modeling and mutation
studies have allowed some characterization of the properties of CB1R’s
allosteric ligand-binding domain, these approaches per se cannot afford
direct experimental observation of the molecular nature of ligand–CB1R
interaction and its consequences for cell signaling, since even conservative,
single amino-acid mutations may alter inadvertently receptor conformation
and function.[41−44] We have incorporated an alternative approach for interrogating directly
the structure–function correlates of ligand binding to druggable
protein targets (enzymes, GPCRs) in their functional state and under
physiological conditions.[45−49] Globally, this experimental paradigm, termed ligand-assisted protein
structure (LAPS), integrates information from point mutations, molecular
modeling, and peptide-level tandem mass spectrometry studies on ligand–receptor
complexes to identify amino acid residues within (or in the immediate
vicinity of) the ligand-binding domain critical to ligand engagement
and activity.[49] Pharmacologically active
ligands of diverse chemical classes purpose-designed to carry reactive
groups as high-affinity, site-directed covalent probes are key elements
foundational to the LAPS experimental paradigm. Various reactive groups,
both electrophilic (e.g., isothiocyanate, benzophenone, etc.) and
photoactivatable (trifluoromethyl diazirine, aliphatic/aromatic azides,
etc.) type, can be incorporated at key positions into a noncovalent
parent ligand to render the parent ligand capable of reacting in a
chemically defined manner with a distinct amino acid specie.[50−52] For this purpose, and in recognition of the importance of cysteine
residues to protein structure and function, we have successfully exploited
the spontaneous, preferential reactivity at physiological pH between
isothiocyanate (NCS)-functionalized electrophilic ligands and target-protein
cysteine nucleophiles.[46,53−56] The isothiocyanate functionality
exhibits pronounced reactivity toward amine nucleophiles and sulfhydryl
groups of cysteine with poor ability to react with other nucleophiles
such as alcohol or water.The successful design and utilization
of covalent affinity probes in LAPS and other experimental applications
to help characterize experimentally the orthosteric ligand-binding
domains of CB1R and other cannabinoid-system protein therapeutic targets[60−62,47,57,58] prompted the current work aimed at generating
a focused library of electrophilic and photoaffinity probes carrying
covalently reacting groups and targeted to the CB1R allosteric site(s).
The design approach was based on the rational derivatization of two
well-studied CB1R allosteric ligands, 1 and 2 (Figure ), guided
by the existing SAR data. Our results document the successful extension
of the application of orthosteric CB1R covalently reactive probes
to the receptor’s allosteric site(s) and constitute the first
identification and functional profiling of a novel, covalent, allosteric
CB1R affinity probe.
Chemistry
From precedent structure–activity
relationship studies conducted by us[40] and
others[59−64] on the two CB1R allosteric modulators 1 and 2, we identified two sites on the molecule, the C3 and C5 positions
of 1, and the C-4 position of 2, important
to the overall allosteric activity of these compounds. A focused library
of seven analogues with electrophilic (isothiocyanate) or photoaffinity
(azide or benzophenone) warheads placed at the terminal carbon of
the C3 side chain and at the C5 position on parent molecule 1, and at the C-4 positon of 2 were synthesized,
generating the novel analogues 19, 20, 25, 26, 33, 34, and 36 containing covalently reacting groups (Schemes –5).
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Piperidinyl Phenethylamine 8
Reagents and conditions: (a) piperidine,
K2CO3, anhyd NMP, 135 °C, 12 h; (b) CH3NO2, NH4OAc, reflux, 2 h; (c) (i) NaBH4, MeOH, 5 °C to rt, 2 h; (ii) NiCl2·6H2O, NaBH4, THF:MeOH (95:5), 0 °C, 3 h.
Scheme 5
Synthesis of Diarylureas 33, 34, and 36
Reagent
and conditions: (a) neat, rt, 1 h; (b) Ba(OH)2, Pd[P(Ph)3]4, DME:H2O (5:2), 150 °C, M.W.,
15 min; (c) Raney-nickel, H2, MeOH, rt, 3 h; (d) triphosgene,
Et3N, toluene, 70 °C, 3 h; (e) Et3N, DCM,
0 °C, 6 h; (f) (i) TPP, reflux, 4 h, benzene; (ii) CS2, 40 °C, 12 h; (g) triphosgene, Et3N, toluene, 70
°C, 3 h; (h) THF, 0 °C to rt, 6 h.
Synthesis of Piperidinyl Phenethylamine 8
Reagents and conditions: (a) piperidine,
K2CO3, anhyd NMP, 135 °C, 12 h; (b) CH3NO2, NH4OAc, reflux, 2 h; (c) (i) NaBH4, MeOH, 5 °C to rt, 2 h; (ii) NiCl2·6H2O, NaBH4, THF:MeOH (95:5), 0 °C, 3 h.The novel indole-2-carboxamide analogues (19, 20, 25, and 26) of 1 were constructed as shown in Schemes and 4. The C5-substituted
indole rings were synthesized with an efficient method that utilizes
Fisher cyclization on a mixture of azo and hydrazone of the corresponding
diazonium salts (Scheme ). The final carboxamide derivatives were synthesized using carbodiimide
based amidation of the substituted indole-2-carboxylic acids with
piperidinyl phenethylamine synthesized as per Scheme .
Scheme 3
Synthesis
of 3-Ethylindole-2-carboxamides 19 and 20
Synthesis of 5-Chloroindole-2-carboxamides 25 and 26
Reagents and conditions:
(a) (i) ethanolamine, EtOH, reflux, 14 h; (ii) KOH, dioxane:H2O (4:1), reflux, overnight; (b) Boc-anhydride, THF, aq NaHCO3 soln, 0 °C (3 h) to rt (24 h); (c) EDCI, HOBT, DIPEA,
NMP, rt, overnight; (d) TFA:CH2Cl2 (1:10), rt,
3 h; (e) K2CO3, CuSO4, CH3OH:H2O (20:1), TfN3 in CH2Cl2, rt, 18 h; (f) di(2-pyridyl)thionocarbonate, CH2Cl2, rt, 15 min.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Substituted
Indole-2-carboxylates 15a, 15b, and 15c
Reagent and conditions: (a) NaNO2, HCl, 0 °C, 1 h; (b) NaOEt, EtOH, 12 h, reflux; (c)
CH3COONa, EtOH, 0 °C, 3 h; (d) 20% H2SO4, EtOH, reflux, 24 h.
N-Arylation of commercially available
4-fluorobenzaldehyde (5) with piperidine gave 4-piperidinylbenzaldehyde
(6).[65] To access the substituted
nitrostyrene 7, we employed the Henry reaction on 6 in the presence of ammonium acetate in nitromethane as a
solvent. Direct conversion of 7 to the desired amine 8 using LiAlH4, according to a previously published
protocol, required 48 h, and the product was isolated in low yield.[66] Alternatively, a route involving first the reduction
of the double bond on 7 with NaBH4 followed
by reduction of nitro group with in situ-generated nickel borohydride
gave 8 in high yield (Scheme ).Scheme describes the synthesis of the key substituted-indole
esters. The alkylation of ethyl acetoacetate using (substituted) alkyl
halides (11) in the presence of sodium ethoxide gave
β-ketoesters (12) as the first step. Condensation
of 12 with freshly prepared diazonium salts 10 (obtained from substituted anilines 9) in the presence
of sodium acetate gave a mixture of azos (13) and hydrazones
(14) as per the Japp–Klingeman reaction. These
intermediates (13, 14) were isolated as
a mixture by passing the reaction crude product over a small silica
gel column, and in the case of 12c the reaction yielded
only the azo compound 13c.[67] This was followed by Fisher cyclization in 20% ethanolic sulfuric
acid to give the chloro indole ester (15a), the nitro
indole ester (15b), and the phthalimido indole ester
(15c) in 57–71% yields.
Synthesis of Substituted
Indole-2-carboxylates 15a, 15b, and 15c
Reagent and conditions: (a) NaNO2, HCl, 0 °C, 1 h; (b) NaOEt, EtOH, 12 h, reflux; (c)
CH3COONa, EtOH, 0 °C, 3 h; (d) 20% H2SO4, EtOH, reflux, 24 h.The azido
(19) and isothiocyanate (20) analogues of 1 were constructed as depicted in Scheme . Base-catalyzed hydrolysis
of the nitro indole ester (15b) gave acid (16b) in high yield. Coupling of 16b with 8 yielded the nitro indole-2-carboxamide (17). Similarly, 15a was used to synthesize 1. The nitro functionality
of 17 was efficiently reduced to the amino indole-2-carboxamide
(18) using in situ-generated nickel borohydride. Treatment
of 18 with a mixture of tert-butyl nitrite
and azido trimethylsilane yielded 5-azido-3-ethyl-N-(4-(piperidin-1-yl)phenethyl)-1H-indole-2-carboxamide
(19). Compound 18 was also served as a precursor
to synthesize the corresponding isothiocyanate analogue (20) in the presence of di-2-pyridyl thionocarbonate (DPT) at room temperature.
Synthesis
of 3-Ethylindole-2-carboxamides 19 and 20
Reagents and conditions: (a) dioxane:H2O (10:1), KOH, reflux, 2 h, acidic workup; (b) EDCI, HOBt,
DIPEA, NMP, rt, overnight; (c) NiCl2·6H2O, NaBH4, THF:CH3OH (13:1), −5 °C,
1 h; (d) t-BuONO, TMSN3, THF, rt, 3 h,
(e) di(2-pyridyl)thionocarbonate, CH2Cl2, rt,
15 min.Phthalimido indole ester (15c) was treated with ethanolamine to give a lactam intermediate
which was hydrolyzed using KOH to give the acid (21)
(Scheme ). The amino group in 21 was protected using
Boc-anhydride to provide 22 which upon coupling with 8 in the presence of EDCI afforded 23. TFA-mediated
deprotection of the NH-Boc group on 23 led to the amino
analogue (24). The azido analogue (25) was
then obtained by treating 24 with in situ-generated trifluoromethanesulfonyl
azide. Direct conversion of 24 into the corresponding
isothiocyanate analogue (26) was carried out at room
temperature using DPT.
Synthesis of 5-Chloroindole-2-carboxamides 25 and 26
Reagents and conditions:
(a) (i) ethanolamine, EtOH, reflux, 14 h; (ii) KOH, dioxane:H2O (4:1), reflux, overnight; (b) Boc-anhydride, THF, aq NaHCO3 soln, 0 °C (3 h) to rt (24 h); (c) EDCI, HOBT, DIPEA,
NMP, rt, overnight; (d) TFA:CH2Cl2 (1:10), rt,
3 h; (e) K2CO3, CuSO4, CH3OH:H2O (20:1), TfN3 in CH2Cl2, rt, 18 h; (f) di(2-pyridyl)thionocarbonate, CH2Cl2, rt, 15 min.Analogues
of 2 (33, 34, and 36) were synthesized as shown in Scheme . Treatment of 2,6-dibromopyridine
(27) with neat pyrrolidine (28; excess)
gave pyrrolidinyl bromopyridine (30) in quantitative
yield. Microwave-accelerated Suzuki coupling of 29 with m-nitrophenylboronic acid in the presence of catalytic Pd(PPh3)4 afforded intermediate 30 which
was further reduced to amine (31) in the presence of
Raney-nickel under a hydrogen atmosphere. The isocyanate intermediate
was synthesized in situ by treating 31 with triphosgene
in the presence of triethylamine and was then reacted with 4-azidoaniline
(32) in the presence of triethylamine to afford the desired
product 33. It was then converted to the isothiocyanate
analogue (34) by treating 33 with triphenylphosphine
followed by exposure to CS2 (Staudinger/Aza-Wittig reaction).[68] Commercially available benzophenone aniline
(35) upon treatment with triphosgene in the presence
of triethylamine gave corresponding isocyanate which was further reacted
with 31 to yield the desired benzophenone-containing
probe (36).
Synthesis of Diarylureas 33, 34, and 36
Reagent
and conditions: (a) neat, rt, 1 h; (b) Ba(OH)2, Pd[P(Ph)3]4, DME:H2O (5:2), 150 °C, M.W.,
15 min; (c) Raney-nickel, H2, MeOH, rt, 3 h; (d) triphosgene,
Et3N, toluene, 70 °C, 3 h; (e) Et3N, DCM,
0 °C, 6 h; (f) (i) TPP, reflux, 4 h, benzene; (ii) CS2, 40 °C, 12 h; (g) triphosgene, Et3N, toluene, 70
°C, 3 h; (h) THF, 0 °C to rt, 6 h.
Results and Discussion
Following the discovery of 1, substantial SAR studies around it revealed that the indole-2-carboxamide
scaffold is a promising template through which CB1R allosteric modulators
with improved affinity, efficacy, potency, and pharmacokinetics could
be generated. These studies identified several key pharmacophoric
features within this structural class that influence their binding
and functional properties.[59,61−63] For example, the indole ring is more important for ligand affinity
with the allosteric site than for its ability to modulate ligand binding
at the orthosteric site (allosteric cooperativity). Alkyl chain length
at the C3 position and the substitutions on the C5 position of the
indole ring significantly impact allosteric affinity as well as cooperativity
at CB1R.[62,63] Replacing the amide linkage with ester functionality
or modulating ethylene linker length between the amide bond and the
phenyl ring drastically reduces the allosteric cooperativity toward
binding.[60,62,64] Replacing
the piperidinyl group with a dimethylamino group significantly increases
the allosteric cooperativity, and groups such as methyl, methylamino,
nitro, and chloro but not fluoro, pyrrolidinyl, or 4-methylpiperazinyl
were somewhat tolerated.[62,64] Along similar lines,
SAR reported around 2 from us[40] and others[61] has enabled identification
of critical positions (especially the C-4 position) on this molecule
that affects CB1R orthosteric ligand binding and downstream signaling.
The commonality of the key phamacophoric features of 1 and 2, their SAR trends, and their unique and paradoxical
pharmacological profile at CB1R strongly suggest that both may be
acting through the same allosteric site on CB1R.
Functional Characterization
A focused library of analogues bearing reactive warheads placed
at the terminal carbon of the C3 side chain and at C5 positions on
parent molecule 1 (analogues 19, 20, 25, and 26) and at the C4 positon of 2 (analogues 33, 34, and 36) were biochemically evaluated in a series of assays. As these analogues
were expected to potentially exhibit the “affinity vs efficacy
paradox” similar to the parent compounds,[26,41] and as a CB1 NAM having functional potency but no effect on orthosteric
ligand binding has been identified,[29] we
chose to first characterize these newly synthesized analogues in two
key functional assays. We characterized both the parent compounds
and their analogues in CHO-K1 cells stably expressing human CB1R (hCB1R)
by using the PathHunter β-arrestin and HitHunter cAMP cell-based
functional assays. The PathHunter technology indexes the ability of
a test agent to affect the recruitment and binding of the pleiotropic
scaffold protein β-arrestin following kinase phosphorylation
of agonist-bound CB1R, a process that uncouples the phosphorylated
CB1R from its cognate G protein (routinely, G), subsequently targeting the receptor for internalization
and enabling the recruitment of signal transducers by the internalizing
CB1R−β-arrestin complex. The HitHunter assay indexes
the ability of a test agent to modulate forskolin-stimulated cellular
adenylyl cyclase activity (i.e., cellular cAMP formation). Notably,
β-arrestin-mediated signaling is independent of both G proteins
and classical second messengers, whereas the HitHunter cAMP assay
reflects signal transduction dependent upon G-proteins and cAMP as
second messenger.[41,69,70]The parent compounds as well as their covalent analogues inhibited
cellular CB1R-dependent β-arrestin recruitment and cAMP accumulation
with nanomolar potencies (Figures and 3 and Tables and 2). The negative allosteric modulatory activity of both 1 and 2 in the β-arrestin and cAMP assays is congruent
with previous observations (Table and 2).[41] Covalent analogues of 1 exhibited a 14- to
83-fold greater potency, and slightly greater efficacy, in inhibiting
β-arrestin recruitment as compared to their effect on cellular
cAMP accumulation (Figure , Table ).
Similarly, covalent analogues of 2 also exhibited greater
potency in the β-arrestin vs cAMP assay, but the magnitude of
the difference (3- to 19-fold) was not as great as that displayed
by the covalent analogues of 1 (Figure , Table ). Among these probes, 20 was the most
potent inhibitor of β-arrestin recruitment (EC50 =
2 nM) and exhibited appreciable activity in the cAMP assay (EC50 = 174 nM) (Table ). Compound 20 was more potent and efficacious
than the parent compound, 1, in both β-arrestin
and cAMP assays (Figure , Table ) and exhibited
the highest functional selectivity (83-fold) for β-arrestin
vs cAMP. When the azide group was attached to the terminal carbon
of the ethyl chain at the C3 position (25), the ability
of the analogue to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation
(EC50 = 1120 nM), as well as its ability to inhibit β-arrestin
recruitment (EC50 = 64 nM), was significantly compromised.
Interestingly, placing the isothiocyanate group at the terminal carbon
of the alkyl chain at the C3 position (26) abrogated
activity in the cAMP assay (EC50 > 10 000 nM)
and reduced activity in the β-arrestin assay by 2 orders of
magnitude (EC50 = 209 nM). Compound 19 displayed
activity similar to that of 1 in the cAMP assay but had
modest activity in the β-arrestin assay (Table ). None of the covalent analogues of 2 displayed a better activity profile than the parent in either
the β-arrestin or the cAMP assay (Table ). Although the azide (33) and
the isothiocyanate (34) analogues showed reduced potencies
in the cAMP assay (EC50 = 166 nM and 118 nM, respectively)
compared to parent compound 2 (EC50 = 71 nM),
they were some 2- to 3-fold more potent than 1 (EC50 = 324 nM) and of comparable potency to the best compound
(20) in that series (EC50 = 174 nM). However,
the potencies of 33 and 34 in the β-arrestin
assay were reduced by 1 order of magnitude as compared to parent compound 2. Compound 36 containing the “bulkier”
benzophenone functionality at the C4 position showed no activity in
the cAMP assay and only residual activity in the β-arrestin
assay, an activity profile justifying our decision not to pursue the
benzophenone analogue of 1.
Figure 2
Antagonism of CP55,940-dependent
β-arrestin recruitment (A) and cAMP inhibition (B) by CB1R analogues
of 1 in vitro. (A) CHO-K1 PathHunter hCB1R cells were
pretreated with indicated test compounds (0–10 μM) for
30 min followed by treatment with CP55,940 (EC80) for 90
min. β-Arrestin recruitment was quantified using the PathHunter
assay. (B) CHO-K1 cAMP HitHunter hCB1 cells were pretreated
with allosteric modulators (0–10 μM) for 30 min followed
by treatment with CP55,940 (EC80) for 30 min. cAMP inhibition
was quantified using the HitHunter assay. Data are presented as %
inhibition compared to maximal CP55,940 effect ± SEM from two
independent replicates per assay. Derived data are presented in Table .
Figure 3
Antagonism of CP55,940-dependent β-arrestin recruitment (A)
and cAMP inhibition (B) and by CB1R analogues of 2 in vitro. Effects on CP55,940-induced β-arrestin recruitment
and cAMP inhibition in the presence of various analogues of 2. (A) CHO-K1 PathHunter hCB1 cells were pretreated
with allosteric modulators (0–10 μM) for 30 min followed
by treatment with CP55,940 for 90 min. β-Arrestin recruitment
was quantified using the PathHunter assay. (B) CHO-K1 cAMP HitHunter
hCB1 cells were pretreated with allosteric modulators (0–10
μM) for 30 min followed by treatment with CP55,940 for 30 min.
cAMP inhibition was quantified using the HitHunter assay. Data are
presented as % inhibition compared to maximal CP55,940 effect ±
SEM from two independent replicates per assay. Derived data are presented
in Table .
Table 1
cAMP accumulation
β-arrestin recruitment
compound
X
Y
EC50 (95% CI)a
Emax (%) ± SEMb
EC50 (95% CI)a
Emax (%)
± SEMb
1
Cl
H
324 (294–482)
78.1 ± 4.49
9.05 (6.63–12.4)
105 ± 2.10
19
N3
H
389 (332–459)
87.1 ± 3.02
28.2
(22.5–35.0)
105 ± 2.07
20
NCS
H
174
(121–252)
111 ± 12.1
2.09 (1.24–3.53)
103 ± 1.38
25
Cl
N3
1120 (962–1280)
96.8 ± 3.75
64.0 (51.0–80.2)
105 ± 2.70
26
Cl
NCS
>10000
–8.84 ± 1.18
209
(160–271)
107 ± 3.94
NAM EC50 value (nM) in the presence of each
designated test compound, determined using nonlinear regression analysis.
Maximal NAM effect, determined
using nonlinear regression analysis. Data are derived from Figure .
Table 2
NAM EC50 value (nM) in the presence of each designated test compound,
determined using nonlinear regression analysis.
Maximal NAM effect, determined using nonlinear
regression analysis. Data are derived from Figure .
Antagonism of CP55,940-dependent
β-arrestin recruitment (A) and cAMP inhibition (B) by CB1R analogues
of 1 in vitro. (A) CHO-K1 PathHunter hCB1R cells were
pretreated with indicated test compounds (0–10 μM) for
30 min followed by treatment with CP55,940 (EC80) for 90
min. β-Arrestin recruitment was quantified using the PathHunter
assay. (B) CHO-K1 cAMP HitHunter hCB1 cells were pretreated
with allosteric modulators (0–10 μM) for 30 min followed
by treatment with CP55,940 (EC80) for 30 min. cAMP inhibition
was quantified using the HitHunter assay. Data are presented as %
inhibition compared to maximal CP55,940 effect ± SEM from two
independent replicates per assay. Derived data are presented in Table .Antagonism of CP55,940-dependent β-arrestin recruitment (A)
and cAMP inhibition (B) and by CB1R analogues of 2 in vitro. Effects on CP55,940-induced β-arrestin recruitment
and cAMP inhibition in the presence of various analogues of 2. (A) CHO-K1 PathHunter hCB1 cells were pretreated
with allosteric modulators (0–10 μM) for 30 min followed
by treatment with CP55,940 for 90 min. β-Arrestin recruitment
was quantified using the PathHunter assay. (B) CHO-K1 cAMP HitHunter
hCB1 cells were pretreated with allosteric modulators (0–10
μM) for 30 min followed by treatment with CP55,940 for 30 min.
cAMP inhibition was quantified using the HitHunter assay. Data are
presented as % inhibition compared to maximal CP55,940 effect ±
SEM from two independent replicates per assay. Derived data are presented
in Table .NAM EC50 value (nM) in the presence of each
designated test compound, determined using nonlinear regression analysis.Maximal NAM effect, determined
using nonlinear regression analysis. Data are derived from Figure .NAM EC50 value (nM) in the presence of each designated test compound,
determined using nonlinear regression analysis.Maximal NAM effect, determined using nonlinear
regression analysis. Data are derived from Figure .To extend the functional profiling of what emerged from the data
presented above as our novel lead CB1R allosteric ligand, 20, we evaluated its activity in the guanosine 5′-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS)
binding assay in mouse brain membranes. This assay reflects the functional
response of GPCR ligands at the level of GDP/GTP exchange by the ternary,
agonist-activated GPCR–G protein complex, an event that can
modulate the activity of downstream effector proteins. The assay is
considered reflective of the degree of G protein activation following
GPCR agonist engagement, an event more proximal to the GPCR itself
in the biosignaling cascade than is cAMP formation or G protein-independent
β-arrestin signaling.[71] We observed
that 20 inhibited CP55,940-induced [35S]GTPγS
binding to CB1R in mouse brain membranes by progressively decreasing
the Emax in a concentration-dependent
manner (Figure ) with
more efficacy compared to 1. When administered alone, 20 was “silent” and did not display CB1R agonism
or inverse agonism in the [35S]GTPγS binding assay
performed with mouse brain membranes (Figure ). Also, 20 did not exhibit
any signs of CB1R agonism or inverse agonism in hCB1 CHO cell membranes
up to 1 μM. A statistically significant, but much reduced, inverse
agonism compared to 1 was observed only at suprapharmacological
concentration (10 μM; data not shown). This compound has been
extensively studied for its CB1R NAM as well as inverse-agonist activity
in CB1R-mediated downstream signaling pathways and in different cell
lines, where it consistently showed lack of inverse agonism. The data
are beyond the scope of this paper and will be published elsewhere.
Figure 4
[35S]GTPγS assay depicting the NAM effect of increasing
concentrations of 20. Mean % increases in [35S]GTPγS binding to mouse brain membranes induced by CP55,940
in the presence of DMSO (n = 12) or 100 nM or 1 μM
of 20 (n = 6) or 1 μM of 1 (n = 4). The mean Emax value of CP55,940 with its 95% confidence interval in parentheses
is 94.3% (85.8–102.8%) in the presence of DMSO, 71.7% (65.3–78.1%)
in the presence of 100 nM of 20, 11.2% (5.6–16.8%)
in the presence of 1 μM of 20, and 32.4% (24.0–40.8%)
in the presence of 1 μM of 1. Vertical lines show
SEM values.
Figure 5
Activity of 20 and CP55,940 in the [35S]GTPγS assay. Mean % changes
in [35S]GTPγS binding to mouse brain membranes elicited
by CP55,940 or 20. The mean EC50 value of
CP55,940 with a 95% confidence interval is 27.3 nM (7.2–103.2
nM, n = 6), and its corresponding Emax value is 87.8% (67.9 and 107.7%). Vertical lines show
SEM values.
[35S]GTPγS assay depicting the NAM effect of increasing
concentrations of 20. Mean % increases in [35S]GTPγS binding to mouse brain membranes induced by CP55,940
in the presence of DMSO (n = 12) or 100 nM or 1 μM
of 20 (n = 6) or 1 μM of 1 (n = 4). The mean Emax value of CP55,940 with its 95% confidence interval in parentheses
is 94.3% (85.8–102.8%) in the presence of DMSO, 71.7% (65.3–78.1%)
in the presence of 100 nM of 20, 11.2% (5.6–16.8%)
in the presence of 1 μM of 20, and 32.4% (24.0–40.8%)
in the presence of 1 μM of 1. Vertical lines show
SEM values.Activity of 20 and CP55,940 in the [35S]GTPγS assay. Mean % changes
in [35S]GTPγS binding to mouse brain membranes elicited
by CP55,940 or 20. The mean EC50 value of
CP55,940 with a 95% confidence interval is 27.3 nM (7.2–103.2
nM, n = 6), and its corresponding Emax value is 87.8% (67.9 and 107.7%). Vertical lines show
SEM values.The activity profile
of 20 in the [35S]GTPγS binding assay
is in marked contrast to that reported for parent compounds 1 and 2, which elicit CB1R inverse-agonist activity
in addition to acting as CB1R NAM.[26,41,42] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report
of a potent CB1R NAM lacking inverse agonism. This functional distinction
between 20 and the standard CB1R NAMs 1 and 2 carries significant translational and rational drug-design
implications. As detailed elsewhere, CB1R inverse agonism has been
associated with peripheral (e.g., gastrointestinal) and central (e.g.,
psychobehavioral) adverse events in preclinical animal models of disease
and in humans.[21,23] The proposition has thus been
advanced that agents capable of attenuating CB1R information transmission
with intrinsically limited, if any, functional potency to elicit negative-efficacy
responses might display an enhanced benefit-to-risk profile as therapeutics
relative to conventional CB1R antagonists/inverse agonists for diseases
with a pathogenic component of CB1R hyperactivity.Structural
comparison between 1 and 20 implies that
modifications of 1 at C5 can generate CB1R NAMs that
retain the affinity–efficacy profile of 1 but
are devoid of or exhibit reduced inverse-agonist activity of conventional
CB1R NAMs. To date, very limited SAR studies have been carried out
with variations at the C5 position. This work identifies C5 position
as the key site for potential modifications for generating future
CB1 NAMs lacking inverse-agonist activity. This conclusion is supported
by recently published mutational and computational data indicating
that electrostatic interactions and van der Waals forces between the
nitrogen in the piperidine ring of 1 and the CB1R aspartate
residue D6.58(366) in CB1R transmembrane helix 6 is crucial for inverse
agonism such that the absence of this nitrogen abrogates the inverse-agonism
action of 1.[42] In our hands,
even with the presence of the piperidine nitrogen, 20 did not evidence inverse agonism in mouse brain membranes and hCB1
CHO cells (up to 1 μM). This result invites the notion that
the increased length of the NCS group at C5 in 20 compared
to the Cl group at that position in 1 might extend 20 in its CB1R binding pocket slightly beyond 1’s original docking position, potentially obviating or reducing
the interaction between the C5 nitrogen on the piperidine ring of 20 and that of the CB1R D6.58(366) residue, leading to loss
of inverse agonism.
Ligand Binding Studies
To profile
the ligand-binding characteristics of our lead CB1R covalent ligand, 20, we first evaluated the effect of 20 on the
specific binding of the orthosteric ligand [3H]CP55,940
to membranes obtained from CHO cells overexpressing hCB1R. Both 20 and 1 significantly enhanced the binding of
[3H]CP55,940 to hCB1 CHO cell membranes and
acted as CB1 PAM of binding. As indicated by the data shown in Figure , 20 produced this enhancement with significantly greater potency (lower
EC50) than 1.
Figure 6
Positive allosteric modulation of [3H]CP55,940 binding by 20 and 1.
Effects of 20, 1, and CP55,940 on [3H]CP55,940 binding to hCB1 CHO cell membranes (n = 6). Mean values significantly different from zero are
indicated by the symbols * (for 20), # (for 1), and • (for CP55,940); one symbol = P <
0.05; three symbols = P < 0.001; Student’s
one sample t test). Positive values indicate enhancement
of [3H]CP55,940 binding. The mean Emax values of 20, 1, and CP55,940,
with their 95% confidence limits shown in brackets, are 116.5% (108.3
and 124.6%), 109.3% (99.1 and 119.5%), and −90.1% (−81.6
and −98.6%), respectively. The corresponding EC50 values, again with 95% confidence limits shown in brackets, are
19.6 nM (10.4 and 36.9 nM), 83.0 nM (44.1 and 156.2 nM), and 4.9 nM
(2.6 and 9.0 nM).
Positive allosteric modulation of [3H]CP55,940 binding by 20 and 1.
Effects of 20, 1, and CP55,940 on [3H]CP55,940 binding to hCB1 CHO cell membranes (n = 6). Mean values significantly different from zero are
indicated by the symbols * (for 20), # (for 1), and • (for CP55,940); one symbol = P <
0.05; three symbols = P < 0.001; Student’s
one sample t test). Positive values indicate enhancement
of [3H]CP55,940 binding. The mean Emax values of 20, 1, and CP55,940,
with their 95% confidence limits shown in brackets, are 116.5% (108.3
and 124.6%), 109.3% (99.1 and 119.5%), and −90.1% (−81.6
and −98.6%), respectively. The corresponding EC50 values, again with 95% confidence limits shown in brackets, are
19.6 nM (10.4 and 36.9 nM), 83.0 nM (44.1 and 156.2 nM), and 4.9 nM
(2.6 and 9.0 nM).To investigate the ability
of 20 to label the CB1R allosteric site(s) covalently,
we carried out time-course experiments between 20 and
hCB1R in membranes isolated from HEK293 cells overexpressing the receptor.
We indexed the covalent association between 20 and hCB1R
as the extent to which a preincubation of the isolated membranes with 20 at a concentration of 500 nM followed by extensive membrane
washings with centrifugation influencing the subsequent level (Bmax) of specific [3H]CP55,940 binding
to hCB1R in the washed membranes. The binding of [3H]CP55,940
to hCB1R increased in a time-dependent manner, reaching a maximum
by 60 min preincubation time with isothiocyanate 20 (Figure ). Incubation of
the CB1 receptor with 20 for 90 and 120 min reduced specific
binding of [3H]CP55,940. Presumably, the extended incubation
time (beyond 60 min) resulted in nonspecific covalent modification
of the receptor and impaired its ability to bind [3H]CP55,940.
These data are consistent with the characteristic dependency of the
association between covalent ligands/probes and target proteins upon
the length of time the protein is incubated with the probe.[60,62,47,57,58]
Figure 7
Time-course studies showing the effect of 20 preincubation on CP55,940 binding. HEK293-hCB1R membranes
incubated with 500 nM of 20 for 0 (control), 30, 60,
90, and 120 min.
Time-course studies showing the effect of 20 preincubation on CP55,940 binding. HEK293-hCB1R membranes
incubated with 500 nM of 20 for 0 (control), 30, 60,
90, and 120 min.The data in Figure provided sufficient
guidance to establish experimental parameters for determining the
effect of 20 on [3H]CP55,940 specific binding
to hCB1R over a range of radioligand concentrations in a saturation-binding
assay. Parent compound 1 was profiled in parallel as
the nonderivatized control lacking the chemically reactive isothiocyanate
moiety and, thus, incapable of covalently interacting with hCB1R.
In accord with our previous receptor-labeling studies,[45−48] we pretreated the HEK293 hCB1R membranes with either test compound
(500 nM, final concn) for 60 min, subsequently washed the membranes
extensively to quench this incubation, and quantified any change observed
for the subsequent specific binding of [3H]CP55,940 to
hCB1R (as Bmax) in the washed membranes.
The saturation binding curves (Figure ) show that preincubation with 20 increased
maximal hCB1R specific binding of [3H]CP55,940 by ∼2.25-fold,
whereas 1 had no effect. The combined data in Figures and 8 indicate that 20 covalently labels hCB1R by
virtue of its C5 isothiocyanate group.
Figure 8
Comparative covalent
labeling of 20 (A) and 1 (B) with hCB1R.
Effect of (A) 20 or (B) 1 on the saturation
binding of [3H] CP55,940 to HEK293-hCB1R cell membranes.
Membranes were incubated with allosteric ligands (500 nM) at 30 °C
for 60 min and extensively washed, followed by saturation binding
of [3H]CP55,940 at concentrations ranging from 0 to 25
nM. Unbound [3H]CP55,940 was removed by washing–filtration,
and the membrane-bound radioactivity was quantified. 1 did not label the receptor covalently and hence did not affect CP55,940
binding after wash, whereas 20 labeled the receptor covalently
and caused ∼2.25 fold increase in CP55,940 binding, as indexed
by the respective Bmax values. Data shown
represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed
in duplicate.
Comparative covalent
labeling of 20 (A) and 1 (B) with hCB1R.
Effect of (A) 20 or (B) 1 on the saturation
binding of [3H] CP55,940 to HEK293-hCB1R cell membranes.
Membranes were incubated with allosteric ligands (500 nM) at 30 °C
for 60 min and extensively washed, followed by saturation binding
of [3H]CP55,940 at concentrations ranging from 0 to 25
nM. Unbound [3H]CP55,940 was removed by washing–filtration,
and the membrane-bound radioactivity was quantified. 1 did not label the receptor covalently and hence did not affect CP55,940
binding after wash, whereas 20 labeled the receptor covalently
and caused ∼2.25 fold increase in CP55,940 binding, as indexed
by the respective Bmax values. Data shown
represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed
in duplicate.
Conclusion
Adverse
events associated with standard CB1R orthosteric ligands (agonists
and antagonists/inverse agonists) have prompted alternative approaches
in chemical pharmacology for leveraging the translational potential
of drug-like small-molecules that modulate CB1R-dependent signaling.
Predominant in this newer thinking for enhancing therapeutics targeting
of CB1R are neutral antagonists with minimal, if any, inverse-agonist
effects and allosteric ligands.[23,24] Due to greater receptor
selectivity and finer control over downstream signaling than standard
CB1R orthosteric modulators, CB1R allosteric modulators offer opportunities
for novel pharmacotherapies with potentially enhanced safety and efficacy
profiles. Rational design of CB1R allosteric modulators as drugs requires
greater understanding of the receptor’s allosteric binding
site(s) and the molecular pharmacology of ligands that are engaged
by it. As part of our continued commitment to address this need, we
report our approach of derivatizing the classical CB1R allosteric
modulators 1 and 2 with a chemically reactive
electrophilic (NCS) or photoactivatable (azide and benzophenone) groups
at the judiciously selected positions within each molecule. Functional
characterization demonstrated that these novel analogues displayed
the prototypical paradoxical pharmacological properties which make
them PAMs of CP55,940 binding but NAM in function. With all of these
analogues and in the assay systems utilized, we observed a consistent
bias toward β-arrestin over cAMP-dependent signaling. Among
these, 20 emerged as the most potent NAM in the cellular
cAMP, G-protein-independent β-arrestin, and G protein-dependent
GTPγS functional assays, and it was more potent than the parent
compound 1. It was also more potent than 1 as a PAM of orthosteric ligand binding. Notably, when applied alone, 20 did not affect the constitutive activity of the receptor
in the GTPγS assay, making it the first ever covalent, potent
CB1R NAM without significant inverse-agonist activity, a property
suggestive of a lower adverse-event risk. Compound 20 engaged the CB1R allosteric site(s) covalently, making this compound
a unique and valuable probe with which to help elucidate the (sub)molecular
features of ligand recognition and engagement by CB1R. Ongoing work
in this regard will incorporate 20 and newer-generation
CB1R allosteric covalent probes into our established LAPS paradigm
in conjunction with site-specific CB1R point mutations and peptide-level
LC/MS/MS for identifying experimental amino acid residues critical
to CB1R allosteric ligand binding/function and mapping structural
features and topology of the CB1R allosteric ligand-binding pocket(s).
Because preliminary data indicate that binding of 20 to
hCB1R is irreversible, the utility of this compound as a structural
probe may be extended to 20–hCB1R cocrystallization
studies aimed at mapping the location of the CB1R allosteric site(s)
and their atomic-level features.
Methods
PathHunter
CB1 β-Arrestin Assay
Chinese hamster ovary
K1 (CHO-K1)-PathHunter hCB1 β-arrestin cells (DiscoveRx,
Fremont, CA) were seeded at 5000 cells/well in 384-well plates 24
h before use and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Compounds
were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted in optimized
cell culture (OCC) media. Agonist EC80 was determined directly
from an agonist dose–response curve (data not shown). The CP55,940
EC80 was 31.1 ± 0.47 nM (mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments). Five microliters of allosteric
modulator or vehicle solution was added to each well at the appropriate
concentrations and incubated for 30 min. Five microliters of agonist
was then added to each well followed by a 90 min incubation. Fifteen
microliters of detection reagent was then added followed by further
60 min incubation at room temperature. Chemiluminescence was measured
on a standard luminescence plate reader as relative light units (RLU).
Basal RLU was defined as zero. Results were calculated as the percentage
inhibition of CP55,940 maximal effect. Data were analyzed using the
four-parameter variable-slope and allosteric EC50 shift
nonlinear regression equations in Prism 5.0 (GraphPad, San Diego,
CA). The results of this analysis are presented as Emax ± SEM, and EC50 (nM) with 95% CI.
HitHunter cAMP Assay
Chinese Hamster Ovary K1 (CHO-K1)-HitHunter
hCB1R cells (DiscoveRx) were seeded at 10 000 cells/well in
384-well plates 24 h before use and incubated at 37 °C under
5% CO2. Compounds were dissolved in DMSO and diluted in
OCC media. Agonist EC80 was determined directly from an
agonist dose–response curve (data not shown). The CP55,940
EC80 was 7.5 ± 0.15 nM (mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments). Media was aspirated and replaced with
10 μL of 1:1 HBSS/HEPES:cAMP XS+Ab reagent containing 20 μM forskolin (DiscoveRx). Five microliters of test
compound or vehicle solution was added to each well at the appropriate
concentrations and incubated for 30 min. Five microliters of agonist
was then added to each well followed by a 30 min incubation. Twenty
microliters of cAMP XS+ED/CL lysis cocktail (DiscoveRx) was then added
followed by 60 min incubation at room temperature. Finally, 20 μL
of cAMP XS+EA reagent (DiscoveRx) was added followed by 3 h incubation
at room temperature. Chemiluminescence was measured on a standard
luminescence plate reader (as RLUs). Basal RLU was defined as zero.
Results were calculated as the percentage inhibition of CP55,940 maximal
effect. Data were analyzed using the four-parameter variable slope
and allosteric EC50 shift nonlinear regression equations
in GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). The results of this
analysis are presented as Emax ±
SEM, and EC50 (nM) with 95% CI.
Radioligand Displacement
Assay
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with
cDNA encoding human cannabinoid CB1 receptors were maintained
at 37 °C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
nutrient mixture F-12 HAM, supplemented with 1 mM l-glutamine,
10% fetal bovine serum, 0.6% penicillin–streptomycin, and G418
(400 μg/mL). All cells were exposed to 5% CO2 in
their media, and were passaged twice a week using nonenzymatic cell
dissociation solution. For membrane preparation, cells were removed
from flasks by scraping, centrifuged, and then frozen as a pellet
at −20 °C until required. Before use in a radioligand
binding assay, cells were defrosted, diluted in Tris buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl and 50 mM Tris-base), and homogenized with a 1 mL hand-held
homogenizer.The assays were carried out with [3H]CP55,940
and Tris binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM Tris-base, 0.1% BSA,
pH 7.4), total assay volume 500 μL, using the filtration procedure
described previously.[41,72] Binding was initiated by the
addition of transfected human CB1 CHO cell membranes (50
μg of protein per well). All assays were performed at 37 °C
for 60 min before termination by the addition of ice-cold Tris binding
buffer, followed by vacuum filtration using a 24-well sampling manifold
(Brandel Cell Harvester; Brandel Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) and Brandel
GF/B filters that had been soaked in wash buffer at 4 °C for
at least 24 h. Each reaction well was washed six times with a 1.2
mL aliquot of Tris binding buffer. The filters were oven-dried for
60 min and then placed in 3 mL of scintillation fluid (Ultima Gold
XR, PerkinElmer, Seer Green, Buckinghamshire, UK). Radioactivity was
quantified by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Specific binding
was defined as the difference between the binding that occurred in
the presence and absence of 1 μM unlabeled CP55,940. The concentration
of [3H]CP55,940 used in our displacement assays was 0.7
nM. The compounds under investigation were stored as 10 mM stock solutions
in DMSO, the vehicle concentration in all assay wells being 0.1% DMSO.
[35S]GTPγS Binding Assay
Mouse brain membranes
(5 μg protein), prepared as described previously,[41] were preincubated for 30 min at 30 °C with
adenosine deaminase (0.5 IU/mL). The membranes were then incubated
with CP55,940 or 20, or with CP55,940 ± 20, 1, or vehicle, for 60 min at 30 °C in assay buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM Tris-base, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA,
100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1% BSA) in the presence of 0.1 nM [35S]GTPγS and 30 μM GDP, in a final volume of 500 μL.
Binding was initiated by the addition of [35S]GTPγS.
Nonspecific binding was measured in the presence of 30 μM GTPγS.
The reaction was terminated by rapid vacuum filtration (50 mM Tris-HCl,
50 mM Tris-base, 0.1% BSA) using a 24-well sampling manifold (cell
harvester, Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD) and GF/B filters (Whatman, Maidstone,
UK) that had been soaked in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM Tris-base,
0.1% BSA) for at least 24 h. Each reaction tube was washed six times
with a 1.2 mL aliquot of ice-cold wash buffer. The filters were oven-dried
for at least 60 min and then placed in 3 mL of scintillation fluid
(Ultima Gold XR, PerkinElmer, Seer Green, Buckinghamshire, UK). Radioactivity
was quantified by liquid scintillation spectrometry.
Data Analysis
Most results were calculated as percentage changes from a basal
level (zero) of [3H]CP55,940 or [35S]GTPγS
binding (in the presence of vehicle). GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad,
San Diego, CA) was used to construct sigmoidal log concentration–response
curves and to calculate values of EC50, Emax, SEM, and 95% confidence intervals. Some mean values
were compared using Student’s one sample t test. P values <0.05 were considered to be significant.
Rat Brain and HEK293 Cell Membrane Preparations
Rat forebrain
membranes for binding assays were prepared according to a published
protocol.[73] HEK293 cells overexpressing
hCB1R were disrupted by cavitation in a pressure cell, and membranes
were sedimented by ultracentrifugation, as described.[46] The membrane pellet was resuspended in TME buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4), and membrane
protein was quantified with a Bradford dye-binding method (Bio-Rad
Laboratories).
[3H] CP55,940 Saturation-Binding
to hCB1 in the Presence of Allosteric Ligands
Membrane preparations
either from rat brain or HEK293 cells overexpressing hCB1 receptor
were resuspended in TME–BSA (TME containing 0.1% BSA), and
aliquots of this suspension containing 25 μg of proteins were
added to each assay well. Membranes were preincubated with 1 (for 1 h) or 20 (for 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min) at
500 nM concentration of allosteric ligand at 30 °C with agitation.
The excess ligand was removed during washes with TME–BSA and
TME buffers and centrifugations at 27 000g, 30 °C. Membrane proteins were quantified with a Bradford dye
binding method (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Saturation binding assays were
performed with the washed membranes and [3H]CP55,940 radioligand
at concentrations ranging between 0 and 25 nM. Nonspecific binding
was evaluated in the presence of 5 μM unlabeled CP55,940. The
assay was performed at 30 °C for 1 h with gentle agitation. The
resultant material was transferred to Unifilter GF/B filter plates
and the unbound ligand removed using a Packard Filtermate-96 Cell
Harvester (PerkinElmerPackard, Shelton, CT). Filter plates were washed
four times with ice-cold wash buffer (50 mM Tris base, 5 mM MgCl2 containing 0.5% BSA, pH 7.4). Bound radioactivity was quantified
using the Packard top count scintillation counter. Nonspecific binding
was subtracted from the total bound radioactivity to obtain the specific
binding of [3H]CP-55,940 (represented as pmol/mg of protein).
All assays were performed in triplicate, and data points were represented
as the mean Bmax and Kd values, calculated by nonlinear regression using Graphpad
Prism 4.0 on a Windows platform.The assay was performed in
200 μL of TME–BSA buffer at 30 °C for 1 h with gentle
agitation. Filtration and washing were performed as described above.
Nonspecific binding was subtracted from the total bound radioactivity
to obtain [3H]CP55,940 specific binding of (as pmol/mg
protein). All assays were performed in triplicate, and data points
were represented as the mean Bmax and Kd values, calculated by nonlinear regression
using GraphPad Prism 5.0.
Experimental
Section
All commercial chemicals and solvents were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (St. Louis, MO), Alfa Aesar, and Combi-blocks
as reagent grade and unless otherwise specified were used without
further purification. Biotage Initiator microwave system was used
for the synthesis of a few of the intermediates of the final covalent
probes. Reaction progress was monitored by thin-layer chromatography
(TLC) using commercially prepared silica gel 60 F254 glass plates.
Compounds were visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light or by staining
with iodine, phosphomolybdic acid, or p-anisaldehyde
reagent. Flash column chromatography was carried out on a Biotage
SP1, Biotage Isolera, or Interchim purification unit using prepacked
columns from Reveleris, Biotage, and Luknova. Solvents used include
hexanes, ethyl acetate, acetone, methanol, and dichloromethane. Characterization
of compounds and their purity were established by a combination of
HPLC, TLC, mass spectrometry, and NMR analyses. NMR spectra were recorded
in DMSO-d6, chloroform-d, or methanol-d4, on a Varian NMR spectrometer
(1H NMR at 500 MHz and 13C NMR at 125 MHz).
Chemical shifts were recorded in parts per million (δ) relative
to tetramethylsilane (TMS; 0.00 ppm) or solvent peaks as the internal
reference. Multiplicities are indicated as br (broadened), s (singlet),
d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), quin (quintet), sept (septet),
or m (multiplet). Coupling constants (J) are reported
in hertz (Hz). All test compounds were greater than 95% pure as determined
by LC/MS analysis performed using a Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity
reverse-phase HPLC, with a dual-wavelength UV–visible detector
and an Agilent Technologies 6120 Quadrupole mass spectrometer (electrospray
ionization).
To a mixture
of 16a (500 mg, 2.24 mmol) and 8 (548 mg,
2.68 mmol) in 5 mL of anhydrous NMP under an argon atmosphere and
at room temperature were added HOBT (302 mg, 2.24 mmol), DIPEA (347
mg, 2.68 mmol), and EDCI (486 mg, 3.13 mmol), and the resulting mixture
was stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with cold
water and the crude product was extracted in ether (3×). The
combined organic layer was washed with water and brine and dried
(Na2SO4). Volatiles were evaporated under reduced
pressure, and the crude product obtained was purified by flash column
chromatography on silica gel (10–40%; EtOAc:hexanes) to give 1 as a white solid (709 mg, 77% yield). Rf = 0.7 (EtOAc/hexanes = 50/50). 1H NMR (500
MHz, chloroform-d): 9.28 (s, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H),
7.20 (dd, J = 8.5 Hz, J = 2.0 Hz,
1H), 7.14 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.04–5.94 (m, 1H,), 3.79 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.13 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 4H),
2.89 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.69 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.75–1.67 (m, 4H), 1.61–1.54 (m, 2H),
1.08 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). Mass spectrum m/z 410.18 [M + H]+.
4-(Piperidin-1-yl)benzaldehyde
(6)
To a solution of 5 (20 g, 161.1
mmol) and piperidine (16.47 g, 193 mmol) in 60 mL of dry NMP under
an argon atmosphere was added anhydrous K2CO3 (44.5 g, 322 mmol), and the resulting solution was stirred at 135
°C for 12 h. Reaction contents were allowed to cool to room temperature
and were diluted with ice cold water. Product was extracted in ether
(3×), and the combined organic layer was washed with water and
brine and dried over MgSO4. Solvent was evaporated under
reduced pressure, and purification of the crude product by flash column
chromatography (0–15%; EtOAc:hexanes) afforded 6 as a pale yellow solid (23.78 g, 78.2% yield). Rf = 0.5 (EtOAc/hexanes = 20/80). 1H NMR (500
MHz, chloroform-d): δ 9.74 (s, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H),
3.45–3.37 (m, 4H), 1.74–1.63 (m, 6H). Mass spectrum m/z 190.12 [M + H]+.
(E)-1-[4-(2-Nitrovinyl)phenyl]piperidine (7)
To a solution of 6 (20 g, 106 mmol) in 100 mL of anhydrous
nitromethane was added NH4OAc (24.44 g, 317 mmol) under
an argon atmosphere, and the resulting mixture was refluxed for 2
h. Solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the reaction mixture
was diluted with ethyl acetate and water (2:1). The organic layer
was separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate
(3×), and the combined organic layer was washed with water and
brine and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was evaporation
under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by flash
column chromatography (5%–20%; EtOAc:hexanes) to give 7 as a dark orange solid (16.10 g, 65.6% yield). Rf = 0.48 (EtOAc/hexanes = 20/80). 1H NMR (500
MHz, chloroform-d): δ 7.95 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 7.42
(d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J =
8.5 Hz, 2H), 3.40–3.36 (m, 4H), 1.74–1.63 (m, 6H).
Mass spectrum m/z 233.12 [M + H]+.
2-(4-(Piperidin-1-yl)phenyl)ethanamine (8)
To a cooled (5 °C) solution of 7 (15 g, 64.3 mmol)
in 120 mL of anhydrous methanol at 5 °C was added NaBH4 (14.66 g, 387 mmol) in small portions under an argon atmosphere,
and the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h while allowing it to
warm to room temperature. It was then quenched with dropwise addition
of 80 mL of saturated NH4Cl. The mixture was concentrated
under reduced pressure, and the crude product was partitioned in ethyl
acetate and water. The organic layer was separated, the aqueous layer
extracted with ethyl acetate (3×), and the combined organic layer
was washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4.
Evaporation of volatiles under reduced pressure gave a crude mixture
which was purified by flash column chromatography (10%–40%;
EtOAc:hexanes) to yield the intermediate 1-(4-(2-nitroethyl)phenyl)piperidine
as a pale yellow oil (12.8 g, 85% yield). Rf = 0.42 (EtOAc/hexanes = 20/80). 1H NMR (500 MHz, chloroform-d): δ 7.07 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.88
(d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (t, J =
7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.23 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.17–3.10
(m, 4H), 1.73–1.66 (m, 4H), 1.61–1.53 (m, 2H). Mass
spectrum m/z 233.12 [M + H]+.To a solution of this intermediate (12.5 g, 53.40
mmol) in 100 mL of anhydrous THF and methanol (13:1) was added NiCl2·6H2O (15.22 g, 64 mmol) under an argon atmosphere,
and reaction mixture was stirred for 45 min at room temperature. It
was then cooled to −5 °C, and NaBH4 (12.11
g, 320 mmol) was added in small portions. The reaction was then gradually
warmed to room temperature, stirred for 3 h, quenched with saturated
aqueous solution of NH4Cl, and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The residue was diluted with ethyl acetate and water and
filtered. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was
extracted with ethyl acetate (3×). The combined organic layer
was washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and evaporated
under vacuum to yield pure amine 8 (8.8 g, 81% yield). Rf = 0.81 (MeOH/DCM = 20/80). 1H NMR
(500 MHz, chloroform-d): δ 7.08 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H),
3.17–3.08 (m, 4H), 2.92 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H),
2.66 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.76–1.66 (m, 4H),
1.61–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.31 (br s, 2H). Mass spectrum m/z 205.16 [M + H]+.
4-Chlorobenzenediazonium
Chloride (10a)
To a suspension of finely powdered 9a (2.54 g, 20 mmol) in 10 mL of 24% aq hydrochloric acid
at 0 °C was added a cold aqueous solution of sodium nitrite (1.7
g, 23 mmol), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h while maintaining
the temperature between 0 and 5 °C. The resulting pale yellow
solution of diazonium salt 10a was directly used for
the next reaction.
4-Nitrobenzenediazonium Chloride (10b)
The compound was synthesized as per the procedure described
for 10a using nitroaniline 9b.The reaction
solution of diazonium salt 10b was directly used for
the next reaction.
Ethyl-2-acetyl Pentanoate (12a)
To a flask containing 300 mL of anhydrous ethanol at 10
°C was added sodium metal (6.0 g, 261.0 mmol) portionwise under
an argon atmosphere, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min to complete
dissolution. To this was added ethyl acetoacetate (34.0 g, 261.0 mmol),
and the resulting solution was refluxed for 30 min and allowed to
cool to room temperature. This was followed by addition of iodopropane
(11a, 44.44 g, 261.0 mmol) over a period of 30 min through
a dropping funnel, and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 12 h.
The mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered, and the filtrate
was neutralized by adding 1 N hydrochloric acid, concentrated under
reduced pressure, and partitioned in ethyl acetate and water. The
organic layer was separated, the aqueous layer extracted with ethyl
acetate (3×), and the combined organic layer was washed with
brined and dried over MgSO4. The product was purified by
flash column chromatography (0%–20%; EtOAc:hexanes) to give 12a as a clear liquid (35.1 g, 78% yield). Rf = 0.45 (EtOAc/hexanes = 20/80). 1H NMR (400
MHz, chloroform-d) δ 4.20 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.42 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (s,
3H), 1.92–1.76 (m, 2H), 1.40–1.20 (m, 5H, especially
1.28, t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). Mass spectrum m/z 172.10 [M + H]+.
To a 500 mL flask containing 150 mL of
anhydrous acetone were added ethyl acetoacetate (10.0 g, 77.0 mmol)
and K2CO3 (11.68 g, 85 mmol), and the mixture
was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. To this was added 2-(3-iodopropyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione
(11c; 24.21 g, 77.0 mmol) and refluxed overnight. The
mixture was filtered through a Buchner funnel, and the filtrate was
cooled to room temperature. Volatiles were evaporated, water was added
to the crude product, and the resultant mass was acidified to pH 4.
The aqueous layer was extracted in dichloromethane (2×), and
the combined organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and triturated
in hexane to obtain the desired compound 12c as a white
solid (18.31 g, 75.1% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.87–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.69
(m, 2H), 4.19 (qd, J = 7.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 3.71
(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.50 (t, J =
7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 1.96–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.78–1.63
(m, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). Mass spectrum m/z 332.15 [M + H]+.
General
Procedure for Synthesis of Substituted Indole-2-carboxylates
To a solution of 2-alkylated ethyl acetoacetate 12 (2.9
mmol) in 30 mL of ethanol was added NaOAc (6.12 mmol) under an argon
atmosphere, and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 45 min, followed by cooling to 0 °C. Aryldiazonium salt 10 was added to the reaction along with additional NaOAc to
maintain the pH at 5, and the resulting solution was stirred for 3
h while maintaining the temperature between 0 and 5 °C. The reaction
was quenched by adding saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution,
and the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The mixture
was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×), the organic layer was
washed with water and brine and dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under vacuum to give the crude product
as red oil which was a mixture of corresponding azo and hydrazone
(13 and 14) intermediates. This mixture
was passed through a small column of silica and dried under high vacuum
to give a thick orange-brown mass. To this mass was added 100 mL of
20% sulfuric acid in anhydrous ethanol and was refluxed for 24 h.
The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and neutralized
by adding aqueous NaHCO3 solution. Crude product was extracted
with ethyl acetate (3×). The combined organic layer was washed
with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and
concentrated under vacuum to yield a crude mixture which was purified
by flash column chromatography on silica gel (0%–20%; EtOAc:
hexanes) to give pure desired indole esters 15.
To a solution of 15a (330
mg, 1.31 mmol) in 30 mL of dioxane was added a solution of KOH (440
mg, 7.7 mol) in 3 mL of water, and the resulting solution was refluxed
for 2 h. It was then cooled to room temperature, concentrated under
reduced pressure, and neutralized by addition of 1 N hydrochloric
acid. The precipitated acid was filtered, washed with cold water,
and air-dried to give pure acid 16a (306 mg, 98% yield)
as white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.04 (s, 1H), 11.57 (s, 1H,), 7.71 (s, 1H),
7.40 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (dd, J = 9.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H),
1.16 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). Mass spectrum m/z 224.04 [M + H]+.
3-Ethyl-5-nitro-1H-indole-2-carboxylic Acid (16b)
The
compound was synthesized as per the procedure for 16a, as a solid (72% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.14 (s, 1H), 8.67 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (dd, J = 8.8 Hz,
2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H).
Mass spectrum m/z 235.06 [M + H]+.
To a solution of 17 (600 mg,
1.43 mmol) in 30 mL of anhydrous THF and anhydrous methanol (13:1)
was added NiCl2·6H2O (356 mg, 1.49 mmol)
under an argon atmosphere, and reaction mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 45 min. The mixture was then cooled to −5 °C
to which was added NaBH4 (324 mg, 8.56 mmol) portionwise,
and the reaction was gradually warmed to room temperature while stirring
for 1 h. Reaction was quenched with saturated NH4Cl and
concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was diluted with
ethyl acetate and water and filtered, the organic layer was separated,
and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×).
The combined organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried
(Na2SO4), and evaporated under vacuum to yield 18 (479 mg, 86% yield). Rf = 0.8
(MeOH/DCM = 20/80). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 10.60 (s, 1H), 7.74 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 6.85 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.69 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H),
6.62 (dd, J = 9.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (br s, 2H),
3.44 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.06 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 4H), 2.90 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.74 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.64–1.56 (m, 4H), 1.54–1.46
(m, 2H), 1.11 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). Mass spectrum m/z 390.24 [M + H]+.
To a solution of 18 (400 mg,
1.10 mmol) in 5 mL of CH2Cl2 was added di(2-pyridyl)
thionocarbonate (308 mg, 1.32 mmol), and the reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 15 min. It was quenched with cold
water and extracted with dichloromethane (3×), and the combined
organic layer was washed with brine, dried on Na2SO4, and evaporated under vacuum. The resultant residue was purified
on silica gel (5%–25%; EtOAc:hexanes) to give pure compound 20 (388 mg, 87% yield). Rf = 0.35
(EtOAc/hexanes = 20/80). 1H NMR (400 MHz, chloroform-d): δ 9.79 (s, 1H), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.17–7.09 (m, 3H, especially 7.14,
d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.92 (d, J =
8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.03 (br t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (q, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.13 (br t, J = 5.6 Hz,
4H), 2.90 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.70 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.76–1.67 (m, 4H), 1.62–1.54 (m,
2H), 1.08 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). Mass spectrum m/z 433.21 [M + H]+.
To
a solution of 15c (10.0 g, 25.2 mmol) in 200 mL of ethanol
was added ethanolamine (3.08 g, 50.4 mmol), and the reaction mixture
was refluxed for 14 h. It was then cooled to room temperature, volatiles
were removed under vacuum, and the mixture was partitioned in ethyl
acetate and water. The organic layer was separated, the aqueous layer
was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×), and the combined organic
layer was washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under vacuum to give the lactam intermediate
as a pure white solid (4.9 mg, 88% yield). Rf = 0.2 (EtOAc/hexanes = 50/50). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d6) δ 11.81 (s, 1H), 7.68
(d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (dd, J = 7.0 Hz,
1.5 Hz, 1H), 3.54 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 2.92 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H). Mass spectrum m/z 221.04 [M + H]+.To this intermediate
(4.5 g, 20.39 mmol) in 100 mL of dioxane:H2O (4:1) was
added KOH (6.87 g, 122.0 mmol) in excess, and the mixture was refluxed
overnight. It was then cooled to room temperature, and the volatiles
were removed under vacuum. The residue was diluted with ice cold water
and acidified to pH 5 with concd hydrochloric acid to give a precipitate
which was filtered and air-dried to give the desired 21 as a white solid. (4.77 g, 98% yield). Rf = 0.15 (MeOH/DCM = 20/80). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.19 (s, 1H), 8.79 (br s, 3H), 7.62
(d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J =
8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 8.5 Hz, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.01 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H). Mass spectrum m/z 239.05 (M + H)+.
To a solution of 21 (4.0
g, 16.76 mmol) in 80 mL of THF was added Boc anhydride (3.84 g, 17.60
mmol) at 0 °C. To this were added 50 mL of aq saturated NaHCO3 solution and water (2:1), and the reaction mixture was stirred
at 0 °C for 3 h and then allowed to warm up to room temperature
and stirred for 24 h. Solvent was then removed under vacuum, ice cold
water was added to the residue, and it was acidified to pH 5 with
cold 5% aq hydrochloric acid. The resultant precipitate was filtered,
and the residue was washed with cold water and air-dried to give crude
product as a cream colored solid which was recrystallized in methanol
to give pure desired product 22 (5.0 g, 88% yield). Rf = 0.25 (MeOH/DCM = 10/90). 1H NMR
(500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.59 (s, 1H),
7.68 (s, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (dd, J = 8.5 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (t as
br s, 1H), 3.16 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 3.15 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 1.31 (s, 9H). Mass spectrum m/z 339.11 [M + H]+.
To 100 mL of CH2Cl2 was added 23 (2.0 g, 3.81 mmol) followed by dropwise
addition of 10 mL of TFA, and the reaction was stirred at room temperature
for 3 h. Volatiles were then removed under vacuum, and the crude product
was washed with saturated NaHCO3 and extracted in dichloromethane
(3×). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried
over Na2SO4, and evaporated under vacuum to
give 24 as a white solid (1.47 g, 91% yield). Rf = 0.2 (MeOH/DCM = 20/80). 1H NMR
(500 MHz, chloroform-d) δ 10.32 (t as br s,
1H), 9.85 (s, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.34
(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (dd, J = 9.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H),
6.89 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.12 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 4H), 2.94–2.84
(m, 6H), 1.76–1.66 (m, 4H), 1.62–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.35
(s, 2H). Mass spectrum m/z 426.20
[M + H]+.
To a 10 mL solution of NaN3 (2.07
g, 31.9 mmol) in H2O was added trifluoromethanesulfonyl
anhydride (3.0 g, 10.63 mmol) in DCM at 0 °C and stirred for
2 h while maintaining the temperature. The organic layer was separated,
the aqueous layer was extracted with DCM (2×), and the organic
layers were combined to afford TfN3. In a separate round-bottom
flask, a solution of 24 (1.0 g, 2.35 mmol) in 20 mL of
H2O:methanol (1:20) was treated with K2CO3 (2.6 g, 18.83 mmol) and CuSO4 (751 mg, 4.71 mmol).
To this mixture was added the above TfN3 solution, and
it was stirred at room temperature for 18 h. Volatiles were then removed
under vacuum, and the residue was dissolved in DCM, washed with water
and brine, and dried over Na2SO4. The organic
layer was concentrated under vacuum, and the crude product was purified
on silica gel (0%–20%; EtOAc:hexanes) to obtain 25 as a pure compound (679 mg, 64%). Rf = 0.7 (EtOAc/hexanes = 50/50). 1H NMR (500 MHz, chloroform-d) δ 11.49 (s, 1H), 8.16–8.06 (m, 1H), 7.75
(s, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H),
6.86 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 3.56–3.42 (m, 4H),
3.24 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.13–3.01 (m, 4H),
2.76 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.67–1.55 (m, 4H),
1.55–1.44 (m, 2H). Mass spectrum m/z 452.19 [M + H]+.
To a solution of 24 (1.0 g,
2.353 mmol) in 50 mL of CH2Cl2 was added di(2-pyridyl)
thionocarbonate (656 mg, 2.82 mmol), and the reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 15 min. It was quenched with cold
water and extracted with dichloromethane (3×), and the combined
organic layer was washed with brine, dried on Na2SO4, and evaporated under vacuum. The resultant residue was purified
on silica gel (5%–25%; EtOAc:hexanes) to give pure compound 26 (956 mg, 87% yield). Rf = 0.35
(EtOAc/hexanes = 20/80). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.52 (s, 1H), 8.17 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (ddd, J = 8.5 Hz,
2.0 Hz, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.86
(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 3.82 (t, J =
7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.48 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.07 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 4H),
2.76 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.65–1.56 (m, 4H),
1.56–1.46 (m, 2H). Mass spectrum m/z 468.16 [M + H]+.
2-Bromo-6-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pyridine
(29)
A mixture of 27 (10.0 g, 42.2
mmol) and 28 (13.87 mL, 169 mmol) was stirred for 1 h
at room temperature. The reaction mixture was quenched with 100 mL
of saturated NaHCO3 solution and diluted with 100 mL of
dichloromethane. The organic layer was separated, washed with water
and brine, and dried (MgSO4) and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The resulting crude product was crystallized from methanol
(50 mL) to afford the desired product 29 (8.5 g, 37.4
mmol, 89% yield) as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d4) δ: 7.22 (t, J = 8.0
Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 4H),
2.04–1.94 (m, 4H). Mass spectrum m/z 228.01 [M + H]+.
To a solution of 29 (2 g,
8.81 mmol) and 3-nitrophenylboronic acid (1.62 g, 9.69 mmol) in 1,2-dimethoxyethane
(10 mL) were added Ba(OH)2 (3.32 g, 19.37 mmol) and water
(4 mL) under argon atmosphere. The contents were degassed, Pd(Ph3P)4 (0.305 g, 0.26 mmol) was added, and the resulting
mixture was irradiated with microwaves at 150 °C for 15 min.
It was then diluted with 200 mL of ethyl acetate and water (1:1),
and the organic layer was separated, washed with water and brine,
and dried over MgSO4. Volatiles were concentrated under
reduced pressure to give crude product which was purified by silica
gel chromatography (20–70%; EtOAc:hexanes) to give 30 (2.05 g, 86% yield) as a yellow solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d6) δ: 8.57 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.50 (td, J = 8.0 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.23 (ddd, J = 8.0 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J = 8.0 Hz, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.51 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 4H),
2.04–1.94 (quin, J = 3.0 Hz, 4H). Mass spectrum m/z 270.1 [M + H]+.
3-(6-(Pyrrolidin-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl)aniline
(31)
To a solution of 30 (5 g,
18.57 mmol) in methanol (100 mL) was added catalytic amounts of Raney-nickel,
and the resultant mixture was stirred for 3 h under hydrogen atmosphere.
Raney-nickel was filtered off and, filtrate was concentrated and purified
by silica gel chromatography (20–70%; EtOAc:hexanes) to give 31 (4.25 g, 96% yield) as a whitish solid. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, chloroform-d) δ: 7.52–7.48
(m, 1H), 7.46 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.41
(m, 1H), 7.29 (s, 1H), 7.23 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H),
6.99 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (ddd, J = 5.5 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz, J = 1.0
Hz, 1H), 3.75 (br s, 2H), 3.57 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 4H),
2.08–1.80 (m, 4H). Mass spectrum m/z 240.2 [M + H]+.
To a solution of triphosgene (70 mg, 0.21
mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was added 31 (130 mg, 0.54 mmol)
followed by Et3N (2.4 mL, 23.6 mmol) under inert atmosphere,
and the mixture was heated to 70 °C for 3 h under argon atmosphere.
The reaction was concentrated under reduced pressure and carried forward
to the next step without any purification. To a solution of this isocyanate
intermediate in DCM (4 mL) was added 4-azidoaniline 32 (72 mg, 0.167 mmol) followed by Et3N (2.4 mL, 23.6 mmol),
and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 6 h. The reaction mixture
was diluted in 20 mL of DCM and water (1:1). The organic layer was
separated, washed with water, dried (Na2SO4),
and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified
by silica gel chromatography (10–50%; EtOAc:hexanes) to afford
the desired product 33 (150 mg, 75% yield) as white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ
8.78 (s, 1H), 8.75 (s, 1H), 8.07 (t, J = 2.0 Hz,
1H), 7.63 (dt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (dd, J = 8.5 Hz, 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (d, J = 9.0
Hz, 2H) 7.34 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.08–7.03
(m, 3H), 6.42 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.54–3.42
(m, 4H), 2.04–1.92 (m, 4H). Mass spectrum m/z 400.18 [M + H]+.
To a solution of 33 (25 mg,
0.06 mmol) in 5 mL of benzene under an argon atmosphere was added
triphenylphosphine (34.2 mg, 0.12 mmol), and the reaction mixture
was refluxed for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature,
1 mL of CS2 was added to this, and the reaction mix was
stirred at 40 °C for 12 h. Volatiles were evaporated under reduced
pressure to obtain crude product which was purified using flash column
chromatography (10%–40%; EtOAc:hexanes) to obtain pure 34 as a white solid (17 mg, 74% yield). Rf = 0.78 (MeOH/DCM = 20/80). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d6) δ 8.96 (s, 1H), 8.84 (s,
1H), 8.07 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.51 (m, 4H, esp. 7.54, d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H),
6.42 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 3.54–3.42 (m, 4H),
2.04–1.92 (m, 4H). Mass spectrum m/z 416.15 [M + H]+.
To a solution of triphosgene (23 mg, 0.77
mmol) in toluene (2 mL) was added 35 (40 mg, 0.16 mmol)
followed by Et3N (0.78 mL, 7.8 mmol) under inert atmosphere,
and the mixture was heated to 70 °C for 3 h under argon atmosphere.
The reaction was concentrated under reduced pressure and carried forward
to the next step without any purification.To this intermediate
dissolved in THF (10 mL) was added 31 (39 mg, 0.167 mmol)
followed by Et3N (0.78 mL, 7.8 mmol), and the mixture was
stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and then at room temperature for 5 h.
The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure, and
crude product was recrystallized from methanol to give desired product 36 (60 mg, 78% yield) as a white solid. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.19 (s, 1H),
8.92 (s, 1H), 8.10 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (dd, J = 8.0 Hz,
1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.69–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.61–7.53 (m, 4H), 7.37
(t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (d, J =
7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 3.54–3.45
(m, 4H), 2.03–1.93 (m, 4H). Mass spectrum m/z 463.21 [M + H]+.
Authors: Elizabeth J Rahn; Ganesh A Thakur; Jodi Anne T Wood; Alexander M Zvonok; Alexandros Makriyannis; Andrea G Hohmann Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2011-03-05 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Jakub Fichna; Misha Bawa; Ganesh A Thakur; Ritesh Tichkule; Alexandros Makriyannis; Donna-Marie McCafferty; Keith A Sharkey; Martin Storr Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fabricio A Pamplona; Juliano Ferreira; Octávio Menezes de Lima; Filipe Silveira Duarte; Allisson Freire Bento; Stefânia Forner; Jardel G Villarinho; Luigi Bellocchio; Luigi Bellochio; Carsten T Wotjak; Raissa Lerner; Krisztina Monory; Beat Lutz; Claudio Canetti; Isabelle Matias; João Batista Calixto; Giovanni Marsicano; Marilia Z P Guimarães; Reinaldo N Takahashi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thomas F Gamage; Charlotte E Farquhar; Timothy W Lefever; Brian F Thomas; Thuy Nguyen; Yanan Zhang; Jenny L Wiley Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Robert B Laprairie; Abhijit R Kulkarni; Pushkar M Kulkarni; Dow P Hurst; Diane Lynch; Patricia H Reggio; David R Janero; Roger G Pertwee; Lesley A Stevenson; Melanie E M Kelly; Eileen M Denovan-Wright; Ganesh A Thakur Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Thuy Nguyen; Jun-Xu Li; Brian F Thomas; Jenny L Wiley; Terry P Kenakin; Yanan Zhang Journal: Med Res Rev Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 12.944
Authors: Dow P Hurst; Sumanta Garai; Pushkar M Kulkarni; Peter C Schaffer; Patricia H Reggio; Ganesh A Thakur Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Simone Bertini; Andrea Chicca; Francesca Gado; Chiara Arena; Daniela Nieri; Maria Digiacomo; Giuseppe Saccomanni; Pingwei Zhao; Mary E Abood; Marco Macchia; Jürg Gertsch; Clementina Manera Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 3.641