Literature DB >> 26529123

Parallel Plating of Simulated Distal Humerus Fractures Demonstrates Increased Stiffness Relative to Orthogonal Plating With a Distal Humerus Locking Plate System.

Phillip A Taylor1, John R Owen, Charles P Benfield, Jennifer S Wayne, N Douglas Boardman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the stiffness of precontoured parallel and orthogonal locking plate configurations in cyclic torsion and bending, and then extension to failure.
METHODS: Tests were conducted on 9 matched pairs of cadaveric humeri. A 10 mm block of bone was excised from the distal humerus metaphysis to simulate comminution, and fractures were repaired in matched fashion using parallel or orthogonal Biomet ALPS distal humerus locking plates (Biomet, Inc, Warsaw, IN). Specimens were tested at 0.5 degree per second up to ±2 N-m in internal and external rotation for 20 cycles, then in flexion and extension cantilevered bending at 1 mm/s to ±50 N, followed by bending at 1 mm/s to failure in extension.
RESULTS: Torsional stiffness of the parallel configuration group was greater than the orthogonal configuration in both internal and external rotation (P < 0.0001). Also, stiffness in bending was significantly greater in the parallel configuration group in both flexion and extension (P < 0.0001). In extension to failure testing, the parallel plate construct stiffness was significantly greater than the orthogonal configuration (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The parallel plate configuration demonstrated significantly greater stiffness than the orthogonal plate configuration in torsion and bending using locked distal humerus plates. This greater stiffness may prove desirable in the postoperative management of patients with comminuted distal humerus fractures, providing a stable anatomic reconstruction of the joint to allow early range of motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26529123     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

Review 1.  Best care paradigm to optimize functionality after extra-articular distal humeral fractures in the young patient.

Authors:  Mark S Ayoub; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-02-07

2.  Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Patrick A Varady; Christian von Rüden; Markus Greinwald; Sven Hungerer; Robert Pätzold; Peter Augat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Parallel versus orthogonal plate osteosynthesis of adult distal humerus fractures: a meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Chien-An Shih; Wei-Ren Su; Wei-Chin Lin; Tai-Wei Tai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Intra-articular Distal Humerus Fractures: Parallel Versus Orthogonal Plating.

Authors:  Jack M Haglin; David N Kugelman; Ariana Lott; Rebekah Belayneh; Sanjit R Konda; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  A Limited Fixation, Olecranon Sparing Approach, for Management of Geriatric Intra-Articular Distal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Philip B Kaiser; Erik T Newman; Christopher Haggerty; Paul T Appleton; John J Wixted; Michael J Weaver; Edward K Rodriguez
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-14

6.  Does posterior configuration have similar strength as parallel configuration for treating comminuted distal humerus fractures? A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Authors:  Chien-An Shih; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Kai-Lan Hsu; Chih-Kai Hong; Cheng-Li Lin; Ming-Long Yeh; Wei-Ren Su
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.