| Literature DB >> 26529081 |
Anna K Lindholm1, Ben Sandkam2, Kristina Pohl2, Felix Breden2.
Abstract
Studies on the evolution of female preference and male color polymorphism frequently focus on single species since traits and preferences are thought to co-evolve. The guppy, Poecilia reticulata, has long been a premier model for such studies because female preferences and orange coloration are well known to covary, especially in upstream/downstream pairs of populations. However, focused single species studies lack the explanatory power of the comparative method, which requires detailed knowledge of multiple species with known evolutionary relationships. Here we describe a red color polymorphism in Poecilia picta, a close relative to guppies. We show that this polymorphism is restricted to males and is maintained in natural populations of mainland South America. Using tests of female preference we show female P. picta are not more attracted to red males, despite preferences for red/orange in closely related species, such as P. reticulata and P. parae. Male color patterns in these closely related species are different from P. picta in that they occur in discrete patches and are frequently Y chromosome-linked. P. reticulata have an almost infinite number of male patterns, while P. parae males occur in discrete morphs. We show the red male polymorphism in P. picta extends continuously throughout the body and is not a Y-linked trait despite the theoretical prediction that sexually-selected characters should often be linked to the heterogametic sex chromosome. The presence/absence of red male coloration of P. picta described here makes this an ideal system for phylogenetic comparisons that could reveal the evolutionary forces maintaining mate choice and color polymorphisms in this speciose group.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26529081 PMCID: PMC4631359 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Standard (top), fully red (mid) and partially red (bottom) morph of P. picta from Georgetown, Guyana.
Survey of P. picta color morph frequency in Guyana and Venezuela.
| Coordinates | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Site | N | W | Year | Red | Standard | Gold | % Red |
|
| ||||||||
| Essequibo | Tuschen | 6° 52.728 | 58° 20.991 | 2010 | 8 | 19 | 0 | 29.6 |
| West Demerara | Pouderoyen | 6° 47.797 | 58° 11.112 | 2002 | 12 | 75 | 1 | 13.6 |
| 2010 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0.0 | ||||
| All | 12 | 99 | 1 | 10.7 | ||||
| Good Fortune | 6° 47.148 | 58° 11.497 | 2002 | 21 | 95 | 0 | 18.1 | |
| Patentia | 6° 41.472 | 58° 11.858 | 2002 | 5 | 57 | 1 | 7.9 | |
| Georgetown | Seawall | 6° 49.632 | 58° 07.346 | 1999 | 8 | 89 | 0 | 8.2 |
| 2000 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 10.0 | ||||
| 2010 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0.0 | ||||
| All | 9 | 121 | 0 | 6.9 | ||||
| Botanical Gardens | 6° 48.332 | 58° 08.720 | 1999 | 103 | 395 | 0 | 20.7 | |
| 2000 | 20 | 139 | 0 | 12.6 | ||||
| 2002 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0 | ||||
| 2010 | 4 | 53 | 0 | 7.0 | ||||
| All | 130 | 596 | 0 | 12.6 | ||||
| Turkeyen | 6° 49.067 | 58° 06.764 | 2010 | 1 | 34 | 0 | 2.9 | |
| All | All | 140 | 751 | 0 | 15.7 | |||
| East Demerara | Great Diamond | 6° 43.312 | 58° 11.532 | 2010 | 4 | 90 | 0 | 4.3 |
| Timeri | 6° 31.643 | 58° 15.062 | 2010 | 4 | 53 | 0 | 7.0 | |
| West Berbice | Rossignol | 6° 16.347 | 57° 32.511 | 2002 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 20.8 |
| Guyana | All | All | 199 | 1180 | 5 | 14.4 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Orinoco Delta | Tucipita | 9° 3.417 | 62° 2.983 | 199 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 14.3 |
Fig 2Box and whisker plot of standard length of standard and red males, indicating median value, upper and lower quartiles and minimum and maximum values.
Inheritance results from inbred lines established by either red or standard morph males of P. picta.
| Generation | Offspring Phenotype | Inbred Line | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red 1 | Red 2 | Standard 1 | Standard 2 | Standard 3 | ||
| 1 | Red males | 14 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Standard males | 14 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Females | 21 | 61 | 7 | 11 | 3 | |
| 2 | Red males | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Standard males | 9 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 3 | |
| Females | 15 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 7 | |
| 3 | Red males | 7 | 16 | 0 | - | 0 |
| Standard males | 4 | 9 | 4 | - | 6 | |
| Females | 8 | 31 | 14 | - | 10 | |
| 4 | Red males | 0 | - | 0 | - | - |
| Standard males | 3 | - | 24 | - | - | |
| Females | 3 | - | 29 | - | - | |
Fig 3Duration of association with males in seconds (mean ± SE) in female preference tests.