Literature DB >> 26528786

Whole-body bone SPECT in breast cancer patients: the future bone scan protocol?

Gad Abikhzer1, Kosta Gourevich, Olga Kagna, Ora Israel, Alex Frenkel, Zohar Keidar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the detectability rate of bone metastases in breast cancer patients using whole-body single-photon emission computed tomography (WB-SPECT) performed with a half-time acquisition algorithm with that of planar ± selected field-of-view SPECT [standard bone scintigraphy (BS)].
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive breast cancer patients (age range 35-74 years) underwent planar BS followed by WB-SPECT (acquisition time 28 min). Clinical and imaging follow-up data from BS, 18F-FDG-PET/CT and CT were used as composite reference standards. Institutional review board approval was obtained. For a review of standard BS results, data from a selected SPECT field-of-view were extracted from the WB-SPECT when requested by the readers. Diagnostic confidence of interpretation criteria were defined using a five-point level-of-confidence grading scale of lesions.
RESULTS: Bone metastases were diagnosed in 34 of 92 studies (37%). On patient-based analysis, the detectability rate of standard BS was 97% (33/34 patients) as compared with 100% for WB-SPECT (P=NS). On a lesion-based analysis, 268 foci were detected, including 124 metastases. Standard BS detected 195 lesions (73%; 99 metastases and 96 benign) and missed 73 lesions (25 metastases and 48 benign). WB-SPECT detected 266 lesions (99%; 124 metastases and 142 benign) and missed two benign foci because of SPECT reconstruction artefacts. The lesion-based detectability rate of metastases for standard BS was 80% compared with 100% for WB-SPECT (P<0.001). WB-SPECT was associated with a higher level of confidence compared with standard BS for both benign (P<0.01) and malignant lesions (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: WB-SPECT is a useful tool for skeletal assessment, showing good performance in comparison with standard BS in breast cancer patients, and may eliminate the need for an initial planar scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26528786     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  6 in total

1.  Accuracy of whole-body HDP SPECT/CT, FDG PET/CT, and their combination for detecting bone metastases in breast cancer: an intra-personal comparison.

Authors:  Olivier Rager; Stephanie A Lee-Felker; Claire Tabouret-Viaud; Ely R Felker; Antoine Poncet; Gaël Amzalag; Valentina Garibotto; Habib Zaidi; Martin A Walter
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-05

2.  Current state of bone scintigraphy protocols and practice in Japan.

Authors:  Hajime Ichikawa; Kenta Miwa; Koichi Okuda; Takayuki Shibutani; Toyohiro Kato; Akio Nagaki; Hiroyuki Tsushima; Masahisa Onoguchi
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020

3.  Whole-Body SPECT/CT versus Planar Bone Scan with Targeted SPECT/CT for Metastatic Workup.

Authors:  Olivier Rager; René Nkoulou; Nadia Exquis; Valentina Garibotto; Claire Tabouret-Viaud; Habib Zaidi; Gaël Amzalag; Stephanie Anne Lee-Felker; Thomas Zilli; Osman Ratib
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Two decades of SPECT/CT - the coming of age of a technology: An updated review of literature evidence.

Authors:  Ora Israel; O Pellet; L Biassoni; D De Palma; E Estrada-Lobato; G Gnanasegaran; T Kuwert; C la Fougère; G Mariani; S Massalha; D Paez; F Giammarile
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Advantages of systematic trunk SPECT/CT to planar bone scan (PBS) in more than 300 patients with breast or prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Fleury; Ludovic Ferrer; Mathilde Colombié; Daniéla Rusu; Maëlle Le Thiec; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Loïc Campion; Caroline Rousseau
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 6.  Imaging diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Kate Downey; Anna Rotili; Enrico Cassano; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-06-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.