Literature DB >> 26528644

Response of depression to electroconvulsive therapy: a meta-analysis of clinical predictors.

Aazaz U Haq1,2, Adam F Sitzmann, Mona L Goldman, Daniel F Maixner, Brian J Mickey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Roughly one-third of individuals with depression do not respond to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Reliable predictors of ECT response would be useful for patient selection, but have not been demonstrated definitively. We used meta-analysis to measure effect sizes for a series of clinical predictors of ECT response in depression. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was searched systematically to identify studies published after 1980 that tested at least 1 clinical predictor of response to ECT. STUDY SELECTION: Of 51 studies identified, 32 were compatible with meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: The weighted mean odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) was computed for each of 10 clinical predictors, based on dichotomous outcomes (responder vs nonresponder). Statistical analyses examined robustness, bias, and heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Shorter depressive episode duration predicted higher ECT response rate (SMD = -0.37, 7 studies, 702 subjects, P = 4 × 10(-6)). History of medication failure in the current episode was also a robust predictor: response rates were 58% and 70%, respectively, for those with and without medication failure (OR = 0.56, 11 studies, 1,175 subjects, P = 1 × 10(-5)). Greater age and psychotic features were weakly associated with higher ECT response rates, but heterogeneity was notable. Bipolar diagnosis, sex, age at onset, and number of previous episodes were not significant predictors. Analyses of symptom severity and melancholic features were inconclusive due to study heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: Longer depressive episodes and medication failure at baseline are robust predictors of poor response to ECT, with effect sizes that are modest but clinically relevant. Patient characteristics used traditionally such as age, psychosis, and melancholic features are less likely to be clinically useful. More robust clinical and biological predictors are needed for management of depressed patients considering ECT. © Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26528644     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.14r09528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  56 in total

1.  Maintenance ECT is associated with sustained improvement in depression symptoms without adverse cognitive effects in a retrospective cohort of 100 patients each receiving 50 or more ECT treatments.

Authors:  James Luccarelli; Thomas H McCoy; Stephen J Seiner; Michael E Henry
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Managing psychotic depression and diagnostic uncertainty in liaison psychiatry.

Authors:  Joanne E Davies; Sarah Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-01-20

3.  Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for moderate-severity major depression among the elderly: Data from the pride study.

Authors:  Søren D Østergaard; Maria S Speed; Charles H Kellner; Martina Mueller; Shawn M McClintock; Mustafa M Husain; Georgios Petrides; William V McCall; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 4.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments.

Authors:  Roumen V Milev; Peter Giacobbe; Sidney H Kennedy; Daniel M Blumberger; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Jonathan Downar; Mandana Modirrousta; Simon Patry; Fidel Vila-Rodriguez; Raymond W Lam; Glenda M MacQueen; Sagar V Parikh; Arun V Ravindran
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.356

5.  A novel Seizure Quality Index based on ictal parameters for optimizing clinical decision making in electroconvulsive therapy. Part 1: development.

Authors:  Laura Kranaster; Suna Su Aksay; Jan Malte Bumb; Carolin Hoyer; Christine Jennen-Steinmetz; Alexander Sartorius
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  Dissociative changes in gray matter volume following electroconvulsive therapy in major depressive disorder: a longitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Hui Xu; Teng Zhao; Feifei Luo; Yunsong Zheng
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  [Effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy : Influence of clinical response from the patient's point of view].

Authors:  M Belz; M Besse; L Krech; I Methfessel; D Zilles
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  A two-site, open-label, non-randomized trial comparing Focal Electrically-Administered Seizure Therapy (FEAST) and right unilateral ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy (RUL-UBP ECT).

Authors:  Gregory L Sahlem; William V McCall; E Baron Short; Peter B Rosenquist; James B Fox; Nagy A Youssef; Andrew J Manett; Suzanne E Kerns; Morgan M Dancy; Laryssa McCloud; Mark S George; Harold A Sackeim
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Social anhedonia in major depressive disorder: a symptom-specific neuroimaging approach.

Authors:  Verena Enneking; Pia Krüssel; Dario Zaremba; Katharina Dohm; Dominik Grotegerd; Katharina Förster; Susanne Meinert; Christian Bürger; Fanni Dzvonyar; Elisabeth J Leehr; Joscha Böhnlein; Jonathan Repple; Nils Opel; Nils R Winter; Tim Hahn; Ronny Redlich; Udo Dannlowski
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Cortisol trajectory, melancholia, and response to electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Brian J Mickey; Yarden Ginsburg; Adam F Sitzmann; Clara Grayhack; Srijan Sen; Clemens Kirschbaum; Daniel F Maixner; James L Abelson
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.