| Literature DB >> 26528224 |
Hongyu Zhao1, Yan Xu1, Fang Wang1, Jiang Jiang1, Xiaohui Zhang1, Xinrui Wang1.
Abstract
The present study examined the differences of conflict coping tactics in adolescents' grade and gender and parents' gender and explored the relationships among conflict frequency, conflict coping tactics, and life satisfaction. A total of 1874 Chinese students in grades 7, 8, 10, and 11 completed surveys on conflict frequency, coping tactics, and life satisfaction. The results obtained by MANOVA suggested that the adolescents' reported use of assertion and avoidance with either mothers or fathers increased from Grade 7 to Grade 8 and did not change from Grade 8 to Grade 11 in parent-adolescent conflicts. The results of paired sample T-tests indicated that adolescents used more conciliation in Grade 7, more conciliation and assertion in Grade 8, and more conciliation and less avoidance in Grade 10 and 11 to cope with mothers than with fathers in parent-adolescent conflicts. Boys used more conciliation and less avoidance, while girls used more conciliation, assertion and third-party intervention to cope with mothers than with fathers in parent-adolescent conflicts. The results of the hierarchical regression analysis indicated the significance of the primary effects of conflict frequency and coping tactics on life satisfaction. Specifically, conflict frequency negatively predicted life satisfaction. Conciliation positively and avoidance negatively predicted life satisfaction when adolescents coped with either mothers or fathers in parent-adolescent conflicts. Assertion negatively predicted life satisfaction when adolescents coped with fathers. The moderating effects of conflict coping tactics on the relationship between parent-adolescent conflict frequency and life satisfaction were not significant.Entities:
Keywords: adolescence; adolescent; conflict coping tactics; life satisfaction; parent-adolescent conflict
Year: 2015 PMID: 26528224 PMCID: PMC4606045 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Means (.
| Conciliation | A–M | 2.31(0.53) | 2.31(0.55) | 2.35(0.49) | 2.38(0.52) | 2.37(0.50) | 2.32(0.52) | 2.13 0.001 | 1.97 0.003 | – |
| A–F | 2.26(0.54) | 2.24(0.57) | 2.26(0.53) | 2.28(0.56) | 2.28(0.54) | 2.25(0.55) | 1.15 0.001 | 0.25 0.000 | – | |
| 2.18 | 2.89 | 7.64 | 6.08 | 7.14 | 7.00 | |||||
| Assertion | A–M | 1.62(0.49) | 1.79(0.51) | 1.80(0.48) | 1.81(0.47) | 1.76(0.48) | 1.79(0.49) | 1.14 0.001 | 10.48 | 8 = 10 = 11 > 7 |
| A–F | 1.58(0.47) | 1.75(0.53) | 1.79(0.49) | 1.79(0.49) | 1.76(0.50) | 1.75(0.50) | 0.10 0.000 | 13.57 | 8 = 10 = 11 > 7 | |
| 1.64 (0.08) | 2.09 | 1.08 (0.02) | 1.04 (0.04) | 0.05 (0.00) | 3.74 | |||||
| Third-party intervention | A–M | 1.53(0.60) | 1.56(0.62) | 1.53(0.62) | 1.47(0.60) | 1.54(0.61) | 1.50(0.61) | 1.47 0.001 | 1.52 0.002 | 8 > 11 |
| A–F | 1.50(0.60) | 1.53(0.60) | 1.53(0.62) | 1.46(0.59) | 1.54(0.62) | 1.48(0.59) | 4.59 | 1.45 0.002 | 10 > 11 | |
| 1.41 (0.05) | 1.49 (0.05) | −0.23 (0.00) | 1.11 (0.02) | −0.24 (0.00) | 2.54 | |||||
| Avoidance | A–M | 1.56(0.59) | 1.79(0.64) | 1.87(0.64) | 1.84(0.64) | 1.74(0.61) | 1.86(0.66) | 7.79 | 15.43 | 8 = 10 = 11 > 7 |
| A–F | 1.58(0.60) | 1.77(0.66) | 1.92(0.65) | 1.89(0.66) | 1.80(0.64) | 1.88(0.67) | 2.95 | 20.29 | 8 = 10 = 11 > 7 10 = 11 > 8 | |
| −0.72 (−0.03) | 0.49 (0.03) | −3.41 | −2.93 | −4.14 | −1.53 |
M(SD). A–M, adolescents' coping tactics when they conflicted with mother; A-F, adolescents' coping tactics when they conflicted with father. The data of conflict frequency and life satisfaction do not distinguish father and mother.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
Inter-correlations among conflict frequency, coping tactics, and life satisfaction.
| 1. Conflict frequency | – | −0.30 | 0.36 | 0.10 | 0.29 | −0.29 |
| 2. Conciliation | −0.29 | – | −0.21 | 0.04 | −0.30 | 0.37 |
| 3. Assertion | 0.35 | −0.21 | – | 0.24 | 0.34 | −0.20 |
| 4. Third-party intervention | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.23 | – | 0.10 | −0.07 |
| 5. Avoidance | 0.31 | −0.28 | 0.31 | 0.12 | – | −0.22 |
| 6. Life satisfaction | −0.29 | 0.35 | −0.20 | −0.07 | −0.26 | – |
Correlations between coping tactics with mother and other variables are presented below the diagonal; correlations between coping tactics with father and other variables are presented above the diagonal.
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
Hierarchical regression of satisfaction on conflict frequency and conflict coping tactics.
| Step 1: Demographics | 0.003 | 0.003 | ||
| Gender | 0.06 | −0.09 | ||
| Step 2: Main effects | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||
| Conflict frequency | −0.16 | −0.16 | ||
| Conciliation | 0.29 | 0.26 | ||
| Assertion | −0.05 | −0.05 | ||
| Third-party intervention | −0.04 | −0.03 | ||
| Avoidance | −0.07 | −0.12 | ||
| Step 3: Interaction effects | 0.003 | 0.007 | ||
| Cf × Con | −0.02 | −0.05 | ||
| Cf × Ass | −0.00 | 0.03 | ||
| Cf × Third | −0.02 | −0.02 | ||
| Cf × Avo | 0.04 | 0.05 | ||
| Total R2 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||
Cf, conflict frequency; Con, conciliation; Ass, assertion; Third, third-party intervention; Avo, avoidance; adolescent-father, adolescents' coping tactics with father; adolescent-mother, adolescents' coping tactics with mother.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.