Literature DB >> 26528084

The Delay Fill Technique: A Safer Approach to Combination Augmentation Mastopexy.

Christopher K Patronella1, Henry A Mentz2, Jaclyn Johnson-Alviza3.   

Abstract

Combining breast augmentation with mastopexy is a challenging procedure that has a relatively high revision rate in the literature. Some surgeons prefer a two-stage procedure to avoid the potential for skin flap or nipple-areolar complex necrosis that can occur with a one-stage procedure. The authors compared 101 patients who had subpectoral breast augmentation with immediate implant fill and mastopexy with 203 patients who had subpectoral breast augmentation with delayed (10-14 days) implant fill and mastopexy. They found the revision rate for immediate implant fill was 24%; in the delayed implant fill group, the revision rate was 10.3%. Patients had soft tissue-related complications in 16% of the immediate fill group and in 2% of the delayed fill group. Delaying implant fill in combined breast augmentation mastopexy significantly reduces the risk of soft tissue-related complications and revision procedures; the delay flap phenomenon is responsible for fewer wound-healing complications when implant fill is delayed during a combined augmentation mastopexy procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmentation mastopexy; breast revision; delayed implant fill

Year:  2015        PMID: 26528084      PMCID: PMC4621391          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Plast Surg        ISSN: 1535-2188            Impact factor:   2.314


  9 in total

1.  Augmentation/Mastopexy: "Surgeon, Beware".

Authors:  Scott Spear
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; James H Boehmler; Mark W Clemens
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Augmentation mastopexy.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Joseph H Dayan; Mark W Clemens
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.017

4.  Augmentation mastopexy: to stage or not.

Authors:  Foad Nahai; Jack Fisher; Patrick G Maxwell; Daniel C Mills
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  Augmentation mastopexy.

Authors:  Mark Gorney; Patrick G Maxwell; Scott L Spear
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 6.  Proper care of early wounds to optimize healing and prevent complications.

Authors:  Geoffrey B Pitzer; Krishna G Patel
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.918

7.  One-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Review of 1192 Simultaneous Breast Augmentation and Mastopexy Procedures in 615 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  W Grant Stevens; Luis H Macias; Michelle Spring; David A Stoker; Carlos O Chacón; Seth A Eberlin
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Secondary mastopexy in the augmented patient: a recipe for disaster.

Authors:  Neal Handel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  One-stage mastopexy with breast augmentation: a review of 321 patients.

Authors:  W Grant Stevens; Mark E Freeman; David A Stoker; Suzanne M Quardt; Robert Cohen; Elliot M Hirsch
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.730

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.