Literature DB >> 26527703

Failed landings after laying hen flight in a commercial aviary over two flock cycles.

D L M Campbell, S L Goodwin, M M Makagon, J C Swanson, J M Siegford.   

Abstract

Many egg producers are adopting alternative housing systems such as aviaries that provide hens a tiered cage and a litter-covered open floor area. This larger, more complex environment permits expression of behaviors not seen in space-limited cages, such as flight. Flight is an exercise important for strengthening bones; but domestic hens might display imperfect flight landings due to poor flight control. To assess the potential implications of open space, we evaluated the landing success of Lohmann white laying hens in a commercial aviary. Video recordings of hens were taken from 4 aviary sections at peak lay, mid lay and end lay across two flock cycles. Observations were made in each focal section of all flights throughout the day noting flight origin and landing location (outer perch or litter) and landing success or failure. In Flock 1, 9.1% of all flights failed and 21% failed in Flock 2. The number of flights decreased across the laying cycle for both flocks. Proportionally more failed landings were observed in the double row sections in Flock 2. Collisions with other hens were more common than slipping on the ground or colliding with aviary structures across sections and flocks. More hens slipped on the ground and collided with physical structures at peak lay for Flock 2 than at other time points. More collisions with other hens were seen at mid and end lay than at peak lay for Flock 2. Landings ending on perches failed more often than landings on litter. These results indicate potential for flight-related hen injuries in aviary systems resulting from failed landings, which may have implications for hen welfare and optimal system design and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26527703     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  6 in total

1.  Welfare Consequences of Omitting Beak Trimming in Barn Layers.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Lena K Hinrichsen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-18

2.  The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour.

Authors:  Isabelle C Pettersson; Claire A Weeks; Kate I Norman; Christine J Nicol
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Limited Associations between Keel Bone Damage and Bone Properties Measured with Computer Tomography, Three-Point Bending Test, and Analysis of Minerals in Swiss Laying Hens.

Authors:  Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Andreas Pfulg; Ernst K F Fröhlich; Susanna Käppeli; Dominik Guggisberg; Annette Liesegang; Michael H Stoffel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-11

4.  Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; M M Makagon; J C Swanson; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Teresa M Casey-Trott; Mette S Herskin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-02-28

6.  Later exposure to perches and nests reduces individual hens' occupancy of vertical space in an aviary and increases force of falls at night.

Authors:  B A Ali; M Toscano; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.