Literature DB >> 26527462

The relative contribution of short-term versus long-term effects in shrub-understory species interactions under arid conditions.

Zouhaier Noumi1, Mohamed Chaieb1, Yoann Le Bagousse-Pinguet2, Richard Michalet3.   

Abstract

Plant-plant interactions (competition and facilitation) in terrestrial ecosystems include: (1) short-term effects, primarily quantified with experimental removals; and (2) long-term effects, mostly due to soil weathering processes, primarily quantified with observational methods. It has been argued that these effects are likely to vary in contrasting directions with increasing drought stress in arid systems. However, few studies have used appropriate methodology to assess both types of effects and their variation across nurse species and environmental conditions, in particular in arid systems. This knowledge is crucial for predicting variation in the mediating role of facilitation with climate change and assessing the importance of nurse effects in ecological restoration. In the arid climate of central-south Tunisia, understory species' biomass, abundance and composition and soil parameters were compared in shrub-control, shrub-removed and open areas for three shrub species and in two habitats with contrasting soil moisture conditions. Long-term effects were dominant, positive for all three shrub species and associated with increasing nutrient content in shrub patches. Short-term effects, mainly related to water consumption, were weaker, mostly negative and dependent on shrub species. Additionally, long-term effects were less positive and short-term effects more negative in the dry habitat than in the wet habitat. Our study provides evidence of the primary influence of positive (facilitative) long-term effects in this arid system. However, the net effects of shrubs could be less beneficial for other species with increasing aridity under climate change, due to both a decrease in positive long-term effects and an increase in negative short-term effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arid communities; Canopy effect; Competition; Facilitation; Soil effect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26527462     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3482-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities?

Authors:  Richard Michalet; Robin W Brooker; Lohengrin A Cavieres; Zaal Kikvidze; Christopher J Lortie; Francisco I Pugnaire; Alfonso Valiente-Banuet; Ragan M Callaway
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Highlighting the multiple drivers of change in interactions along stress gradients.

Authors:  Richard Michalet
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Positive interactions between alpine plant species and the nurse cushion plant Laretia acaulis do not increase with elevation in the Andes of central Chile.

Authors:  Lohengrin A Cavieres; Ernesto I Badano; Angela Sierra-Almeida; Susana Gómez-González; Marco A Molina-Montenegro
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Twenty years of changes in spatial association and community structure among desert perennials.

Authors:  Maria N Miriti
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Shifts from competition to facilitation between a foundation tree and a pioneer shrub across spatial and temporal scales in a semiarid woodland.

Authors:  Christopher M Sthultz; Catherine A Gehring; Thomas G Whitham
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Positive interactions in communities.

Authors:  M D Bertness; R Callaway
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Extreme stresses, niches, and positive species interactions along stress gradients.

Authors:  Qiang He; Mark D Bertness
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe.

Authors:  Fernando T Maestre; Jordi Cortina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Biophysical feedback mediates effects of invasive grasses on coastal dune shape.

Authors:  Phoebe L Zarnetske; Sally D Hacker; Eric W Seabloom; Peter Ruggiero; Jason R Killian; Timothy B Maddux; Daniel Cox
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  5 in total

1.  Do shrubs improve reproductive chances of neighbors across soil types in drought?

Authors:  Elizabeth K Swanson; Roger L Sheley; Jeremy J James
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Competition and facilitation structure plant communities under nurse tree canopies in extremely stressful environments.

Authors:  Ali A Al-Namazi; Magdy I El-Bana; Stephen P Bonser
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Examining differences in phylogenetic composition enhances understanding of the phylogenetic structure of the shrub community in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Yuanming Xiao; Lucun Yang; Xiuqing Nie; Changbin Li; Feng Xiong; Lingling Wang; Guoying Zhou
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Facilitation Effects of Haloxylon salicornicum Shrubs on Associated Understory Annuals, and a Modified "Stress-Gradient" Hypothesis for Droughty Times.

Authors:  Nasr H Gomaa; Ahmad K Hegazy; Arafat Abdel Hamed Abdel Latef
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07

5.  Increasing water availability and facilitation weaken biodiversity-biomass relationships in shrublands.

Authors:  Yanpei Guo; Christian Schöb; Wenhong Ma; Anwar Mohammat; Hongyan Liu; Shunli Yu; Youxu Jiang; Bernhard Schmid; Zhiyao Tang
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.499

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.