Literature DB >> 26527295

Genetic and Environmental Causes of Variation in the Difference Between Biological Age Based on DNA Methylation and Chronological Age for Middle-Aged Women.

Shuai Li1, Ee Ming Wong2, JiHoon E Joo2, Chol-Hee Jung3, Jessica Chung3, Carmel Apicella1, Jennifer Stone4, Gillian S Dite1, Graham G Giles1, Melissa C Southey2, John L Hopper1.   

Abstract

The disease- and mortality-related difference between biological age based on DNA methylation and chronological age (Δage) has been found to have approximately 40% heritability by assuming that the familial correlation is only explained by additive genetic factors. We calculated two different Δage measures for 132 middle-aged female twin pairs (66 monozygotic and 66 dizygotic twin pairs) and their 215 sisters using DNA methylation data measured by the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip arrays. For each Δage measure, and their combined measure, we estimated the familial correlation for MZ, DZ and sibling pairs using the multivariate normal model for pedigree analysis. We also pooled our estimates with those from a former study to estimate weighted average correlations. For both Δage measures, there was familial correlation that varied across different types of relatives. No evidence of a difference was found between the MZ and DZ pair correlations, or between the DZ and sibling pair correlations. The only difference was between the MZ and sibling pair correlations (p < .01), and there was marginal evidence that the MZ pair correlation was greater than twice the sibling pair correlation (p < .08). For weighted average correlation, there was evidence that the MZ pair correlation was greater than the DZ pair correlation (p < .03), and marginally greater than twice the sibling pair correlation (p < .08). The varied familial correlation of Δage is not explained by additive genetic factors alone, implying the existence of shared non-genetic factors explaining variation in Δage for middle-aged women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; age; familial correlation; heritability; twin family study

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26527295     DOI: 10.1017/thg.2015.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  15 in total

1.  Association between DNA methylation at SOCS3 gene and body mass index might be due to familial confounding.

Authors:  S Li; E M Wong; M C Southey; J L Hopper
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Causes of blood methylomic variation for middle-aged women measured by the HumanMethylation450 array.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Ee Ming Wong; Tuong L Nguyen; Ji-Hoon Eric Joo; Jennifer Stone; Gillian S Dite; Graham G Giles; Richard Saffery; Melissa C Southey; John L Hopper
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Twin birth changes DNA methylation of subsequent siblings.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Eunae Kim; Ee Ming Wong; Ji-Hoon Eric Joo; Tuong L Nguyen; Jennifer Stone; Yun-Mi Song; Louisa B Flander; Richard Saffery; Graham G Giles; Melissa C Southey; Joohon Sung; John L Hopper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with biological aging.

Authors:  Cavin K Ward-Caviness; Jamaji C Nwanaji-Enwerem; Kathrin Wolf; Simone Wahl; Elena Colicino; Letizia Trevisi; Itai Kloog; Allan C Just; Pantel Vokonas; Josef Cyrys; Christian Gieger; Joel Schwartz; Andrea A Baccarelli; Alexandra Schneider; Annette Peters
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-15

5.  An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan.

Authors:  Morgan E Levine; Ake T Lu; Austin Quach; Brian H Chen; Themistocles L Assimes; Stefania Bandinelli; Lifang Hou; Andrea A Baccarelli; James D Stewart; Yun Li; Eric A Whitsel; James G Wilson; Alex P Reiner; Abraham Aviv; Kurt Lohman; Yongmei Liu; Luigi Ferrucci; Steve Horvath
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.682

6.  Genome-wide average DNA methylation is determined in utero.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Ee Ming Wong; Pierre-Antoine Dugué; Allan F McRae; Eunae Kim; Ji-Hoon Eric Joo; Tuong L Nguyen; Jennifer Stone; Gillian S Dite; Nicola J Armstrong; Karen A Mather; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Margaret J Wright; David Ames; Roger L Milne; Jeffrey M Craig; Richard Saffery; Grant W Montgomery; Yun-Mi Song; Joohon Sung; Timothy D Spector; Perminder S Sachdev; Graham G Giles; Melissa C Southey; John L Hopper
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 7.  The epigenetic clock as a predictor of disease and mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter D Fransquet; Jo Wrigglesworth; Robyn L Woods; Michael E Ernst; Joanne Ryan
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 6.551

8.  Inference about causation between body mass index and DNA methylation in blood from a twin family study.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Ee Ming Wong; Minh Bui; Tuong L Nguyen; Ji-Hoon Eric Joo; Jennifer Stone; Gillian S Dite; Pierre-Antoine Dugué; Roger L Milne; Graham G Giles; Richard Saffery; Melissa C Southey; John L Hopper
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Causal effect of smoking on DNA methylation in peripheral blood: a twin and family study.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Ee Ming Wong; Minh Bui; Tuong L Nguyen; Ji-Hoon Eric Joo; Jennifer Stone; Gillian S Dite; Graham G Giles; Richard Saffery; Melissa C Southey; John L Hopper
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.551

10.  Longitudinal changes in the genetic and environmental influences on the epigenetic clocks across old age: Evidence from two twin cohorts.

Authors:  Juulia Jylhävä; Jacob Hjelmborg; Mette Soerensen; Elizabeth Munoz; Qihua Tan; Ralf Kuja-Halkola; Jonas Mengel-From; Kaare Christensen; Lene Christiansen; Sara Hägg; Nancy L Pedersen; Chandra A Reynolds
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.