Literature DB >> 26526421

Completeness of revascularization and its impact on the outcomes of a staged approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive valve surgery for patients with concomitant coronary artery and valvular heart disease.

Andrés M Pineda1, Ramesh Chandra1, Saqib A Gowani1, Orlando Santana1, Christos G Mihos1, Ajay J Kirtane2, Gregg W Stone2, Paul Kurlansky2, Craig R Smith2, Nirat Beohar3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A staged approach of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) is an alternative to the conventional combined coronary artery bypass and valve surgery for patients with concomitant coronary artery and valve disease. Limited data exist on degree of the completeness of revascularization achieved with this approach and its impact on outcomes.
METHODS: A total of 138 patients, who underwent a staged approach between January 2009 and June 2013, were retrospectively evaluated. Coronary angiograms were reviewed by two cardiologists blinded to outcomes and were then categorized into two groups: complete or incomplete revascularization, which was defined as ≥1 major epicardial coronary arteries of at least 2.0 mm diameter with ≥70% untreated obstruction after the index PCI and before MIVS.
RESULTS: Complete and incomplete revascularization was achieved in 105 (76%) and 33 (24%) patients, respectively. The patients with incomplete revascularization had a lower ejection fraction, a higher STS score, and more prior myocardial infarctions and multi-vessel coronary artery disease. There were no differences in the post-operative complications, 30-day mortality, or 3-year survival (84 vs. 83%, P = 0.68). After a median follow-up of 29 months, incompletely revascularized patients had a higher incidence of acute coronary syndrome (2.9 vs. 12.9%, P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing a staged approach of PCI followed by MIVS, incomplete revascularization did not significantly impact the short or mid-term survival, but was associated with an increased incidence of acute coronary syndrome at follow-up.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; minimally invasive surgery; percutaneous coronary intervention; revascularization; staged approach; valve disease

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26526421     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 5-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Maurice Mawad; Todd B Heimowitz; Andrés M Pineda; Howard S Goldman; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Outcomes of a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Angelo LaPietra; Maurice Mawad; Gerald P Rosen; Nirat Beohar; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Clinical Impact of Heart Team Decisions for Patients With Complex Valvular Heart Disease: A Large, Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Francesca Graziani; Carlo Trani; Cristina Aurigemma; Piergiorgio Bruno; Antonella Lombardo; Giovanna Liuzzo; Marialisa Nesta; Gaetano Antonio Lanza; Enrico Romagnoli; Gabriella Locorotondo; Antonio Maria Leone; Natalia Pavone; Claudio Spalletta; Gemma Pelargonio; Tommaso Sanna; Nadia Aspromonte; Franco Cavaliere; Filippo Crea; Massimo Massetti
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.106

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.