Literature DB >> 26526273

Prediction of designer drugs: synthesis and spectroscopic analysis of synthetic cannabinoid analogues of 1H-indol-3-yl(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone and 1H-indol-3-yl(adamantan-1-yl)methanone.

Andreas Carlsson1, Sandra Lindberg2, Xiongyu Wu3, Simon Dunne4, Martin Josefsson3,5, Crister Åstot2, Johan Dahlén3.   

Abstract

In this work, emergence patterns of synthetic cannabinoids were utilized in an attempt to predict those that may appear on the drug market in the future. Based on this information, two base structures of the synthetic cannabinoid analogues - (1H-indol-3-yl(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone and 1H-indol-3-yl(adamantan-1-yl)methanone) - together with three substituents - butyl, 4-fluorobutyl and ethyl tetrahydropyran - were selected for synthesis. This resulted in a total of six synthetic cannabinoid analogues that to the authors' knowledge have not yet appeared on the drug market. Spectroscopic data, including nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), mass spectrometry (MS), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (solid and gas phase), are presented for the synthesized analogues and some additional related cannabinoids. In this context, the suitability of the employed techniques for the identification of unknowns is discussed and the use of GC-FTIR as a secondary complementary technique to GC-MS is addressed. Examples of compounds that are difficult to differentiate by their mass spectra, but can be distinguished based upon their gas phase FTIR spectra are presented. Conversely, structural homologues where mass spectra are more powerful than gas phase FTIR spectra for unambiguous assignments are also exemplified. This work further emphasizes that a combination of several techniques is the key to success in structural elucidations.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug analysis; mass spectrometry; proactive; synthesis; synthetic cannabinoids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26526273     DOI: 10.1002/dta.1904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Test Anal        ISSN: 1942-7603            Impact factor:   3.345


  2 in total

Review 1.  Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.

Authors:  Nicole S Jones; Jeffrey H Comparin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2020-05-24

2.  Proactive forensic science in biometrics: Novel materials for fingerprint spoofing.

Authors:  Michel Saguy; Joseph Almog; Daniel Cohn; Christophe Champod
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 1.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.