Literature DB >> 26525592

Monitoring immune responses in a mouse model of fracture fixation with and without Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.

Edward T J Rochford1, Marina Sabaté Brescó2, Stephan Zeiter1, Katharina Kluge1, Alexandra Poulsson1, Mario Ziegler3, R Geoff Richards1, Liam O'Mahony3, T Fintan Moriarty4.   

Abstract

Post-traumatic bone fractures are commonly fixed with implanted devices to restore the anatomical position of bone fragments and aid in the healing process. Bacterial infection in this situation is a challenge for clinicians due to the need for aggressive antibiotic therapy, debridement of infected tissues, and the need to maintain fracture stability. The aim of this study was to monitor immune responses that occur during healing and during Staphylococcus aureus infection, in a clinically relevant murine model of fracture fixation. Skeletally mature C57bl/6 mice received a transverse osteotomy of the femur, which was treated with commercially available titanium fracture fixation plates and screws. In the absence of infection, healing of the fracture was complete within 35days and was characterized by elevated Interleukin (IL)-4 and Interferon-gamma secretion from bone-derived cells and expression of these same genes. In contrast, mice inoculated with S. aureus could not heal the fracture within the observation period and were found to develop typical signs of implant-associated bone infection, including biofilm formation on the implant and osteolysis of surrounding bone. The immune response to infection was characterized by a TH17-led bone response, and a pro-inflammatory cytokine-led Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, Interleukin (IL)-1β) soft tissue response, both of which were ineffectual in clearing implant related bone and soft tissue infections respectively. In this murine model, we characterize the kinetics of pro-inflammatory responses to infection, secondary to bone trauma and surgery. A divergent local immune polarization is evident in the infected versus non-infected animals, with the immune response ultimately unable to clear the S. aureus infection.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Fracture; Host responses; Implant associated infections; Osteomyelitis; Osteosynthesis; Pathogenesis; S. aureus; Trauma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26525592     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  20 in total

Review 1.  Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Maria Magana; Christina Sereti; Anastasios Ioannidis; Courtney A Mitchell; Anthony R Ball; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Michael R Hamblin; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; George P Tegos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Infectious Dose Dictates the Host Response during Staphylococcus aureus Orthopedic-Implant Biofilm Infection.

Authors:  Debbie Vidlak; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Three-Dimensional In Vitro Staphylococcus aureus Abscess Communities Display Antibiotic Tolerance and Protection from Neutrophil Clearance.

Authors:  Marloes I Hofstee; Martijn Riool; Igors Terjajevs; Keith Thompson; Martin J Stoddart; R Geoff Richards; Sebastian A J Zaat; T Fintan Moriarty
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  CCR2 contributes to host defense against Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic implant-associated infections in mice.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Dustin Dikeman; Jeffrey Zhang; Nicole Ackerman; Sophia Kim; Martin P Alphonse; Roger V Ortines; Haiyun Liu; Daniel P Joyce; Carly A Dillen; John M Thompson; Abigail A Thomas; Roger D Plaut; Lloyd S Miller; Nathan K Archer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  A rabbit model of implant-related osteomyelitis inoculated with biofilm after open femoral fracture.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Yun-Fei Ma; Lei Wang; Nan Jiang; Cheng-He Qin; Yan-Jun Hu; Bin Yu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Pathogenic Mechanisms and Host Interactions in Staphylococcus epidermidis Device-Related Infection.

Authors:  Marina Sabaté Brescó; Llinos G Harris; Keith Thompson; Barbara Stanic; Mario Morgenstern; Liam O'Mahony; R Geoff Richards; T Fintan Moriarty
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Synovial Fluid Interleukin-16 Contributes to Osteoclast Activation and Bone Loss through the JNK/NFATc1 Signaling Cascade in Patients with Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Yuhan Chang; Yi-Min Hsiao; Chih-Chien Hu; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Cai-Yan Li; Steve W N Ueng; Mei-Feng Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Lysostaphin and BMP-2 co-delivery reduces S. aureus infection and regenerates critical-sized segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Christopher T Johnson; Mary Caitlin P Sok; Karen E Martin; Pranav P Kalelkar; Jeremy D Caplin; Edward A Botchwey; Andrés J García
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Gram-Positive Versus Gram-Negative Bacteria: Lipopolysaccharide, but not Lipoteichoic Acid, Exerts Adverse Osteoclast-Mediated Effects on the Bone.

Authors:  Mei-Feng Chen; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Chih-Chien Hu; Ying-Yu Wu; Yuhan Chang; Steve W N Ueng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Five Days Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment Increases Bone Formation and Reduces Gap Size of a Rat Segmental Bone Defect: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marietta Herrmann; Stephan Zeiter; Ursula Eberli; Maria Hildebrand; Karin Camenisch; Ursula Menzel; Mauro Alini; Sophie Verrier; Vincent A Stadelmann
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.