David J Clark1, Richard R Neptune2, Andrea L Behrman3, Steven A Kautz4. 1. Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: davidclark@ufl.edu. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. 3. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. 4. Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that participants with stroke will exhibit appropriate increase in muscle activation of the paretic leg when taking a long step with the nonparetic leg compared to during steady-state walking, with a consequent increase in biomechanical output and symmetry during the stance phase of the modified gait cycle. DESIGN: Single-session observational study. SETTING: Clinical research center in an outpatient hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with chronic poststroke hemiparesis (N=15). INTERVENTIONS: Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill while kinetic, kinematic, and electromyogram data were recorded. Participants performed steady-state walking and a separate trial of the long-step adaptability task in which they were instructed to intermittently take a longer step with the nonparetic leg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Forward progression, propulsive force, and neuromuscular activation during walking. RESULTS: Participants performed the adaptability task successfully and demonstrated greater neuromuscular activation in appropriate paretic leg muscles, particularly increased activity in paretic plantarflexor muscles. Propulsion and forward progression by the paretic leg were also increased. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the assertion that the nonparetic long-step task may be effective for use in poststroke locomotor rehabilitation to engage the paretic leg and promote recovery of walking.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that participants with stroke will exhibit appropriate increase in muscle activation of the paretic leg when taking a long step with the nonparetic leg compared to during steady-state walking, with a consequent increase in biomechanical output and symmetry during the stance phase of the modified gait cycle. DESIGN: Single-session observational study. SETTING: Clinical research center in an outpatient hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with chronic poststroke hemiparesis (N=15). INTERVENTIONS:Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill while kinetic, kinematic, and electromyogram data were recorded. Participants performed steady-state walking and a separate trial of the long-step adaptability task in which they were instructed to intermittently take a longer step with the nonparetic leg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Forward progression, propulsive force, and neuromuscular activation during walking. RESULTS:Participants performed the adaptability task successfully and demonstrated greater neuromuscular activation in appropriate paretic leg muscles, particularly increased activity in paretic plantarflexor muscles. Propulsion and forward progression by the paretic leg were also increased. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the assertion that the nonparetic long-step task may be effective for use in poststroke locomotor rehabilitation to engage the paretic leg and promote recovery of walking.
Authors: Chitralakshmi K Balasubramanian; Mark G Bowden; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Steven A Kautz; Pamela W Duncan; Subashan Perera; Richard R Neptune; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: David J Clark; Steven A Kautz; Andrew R Bauer; Yen-Ting Chen; Evangelos A Christou Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Neha Lodha; Yen-Ting Chen; Theresa E McGuirk; Emily J Fox; Steven A Kautz; Evangelos A Christou; David J Clark Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: David J Reinkensmeyer; Etienne Burdet; Maura Casadio; John W Krakauer; Gert Kwakkel; Catherine E Lang; Stephan P Swinnen; Nick S Ward; Nicolas Schweighofer Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 5.208