Literature DB >> 26525393

Inter-laboratory study of human in vitro toxicogenomics-based tests as alternative methods for evaluating chemical carcinogenicity: a bioinformatics perspective.

R Herwig1, H Gmuender2, R Corvi3, K M Bloch4, A Brandenburg2, J Castell5, L Ceelen6, C Chesne7, T Y Doktorova6, D Jennen8, P Jennings9, A Limonciel9, E A Lock4, T McMorrow10, P Phrakonkham3, R Radford10, C Slattery10, R Stierum11, M Vilardell12, T Wittenberger2, R Yildirimman12, M Ryan10, V Rogiers6, J Kleinjans8.   

Abstract

The assessment of the carcinogenic potential of chemicals with alternative, human-based in vitro systems has become a major goal of toxicogenomics. The central read-out of these assays is the transcriptome, and while many studies exist that explored the gene expression responses of such systems, reports on robustness and reproducibility, when testing them independently in different laboratories, are still uncommon. Furthermore, there is limited knowledge about variability induced by the data analysis protocols. We have conducted an inter-laboratory study for testing chemical carcinogenicity evaluating two human in vitro assays: hepatoma-derived cells and hTERT-immortalized renal proximal tubule epithelial cells, representing liver and kidney as major target organs. Cellular systems were initially challenged with thirty compounds, genome-wide gene expression was measured with microarrays, and hazard classifiers were built from this training set. Subsequently, each system was independently established in three different laboratories, and gene expression measurements were conducted using anonymized compounds. Data analysis was performed independently by two separate groups applying different protocols for the assessment of inter-laboratory reproducibility and for the prediction of carcinogenic hazard. As a result, both workflows came to very similar conclusions with respect to (1) identification of experimental outliers, (2) overall assessment of robustness and inter-laboratory reproducibility and (3) re-classification of the unknown compounds to the respective toxicity classes. In summary, the developed bioinformatics workflows deliver accurate measures for inter-laboratory comparison studies, and the study can be used as guidance for validation of future carcinogenicity assays in order to implement testing of human in vitro alternatives to animal testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Carcinogenicity; In vitro assays; Inter-laboratory assessment; Pre-validation; Toxicogenomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26525393     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-015-1617-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  5 in total

1.  GADD45 in Stress Signaling, Cell Cycle Control, and Apoptosis.

Authors:  Arslon Humayun; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Moving forward in carcinogenicity assessment: Report of an EURL ECVAM/ESTIV workshop.

Authors:  Raffaella Corvi; Federica Madia; Kathryn Z Guyton; Peter Kasper; Ruthann Rudel; Annamaria Colacci; Jos Kleinjans; Paul Jennings
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  ToxicoDB: an integrated database to mine and visualize large-scale toxicogenomic datasets.

Authors:  Sisira Kadambat Nair; Christopher Eeles; Chantal Ho; Gangesh Beri; Esther Yoo; Denis Tkachuk; Amy Tang; Parwaiz Nijrabi; Petr Smirnov; Heewon Seo; Danyel Jennen; Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  3S - Systematic, systemic, and systems biology and toxicology.

Authors:  Lena Smirnova; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Raffaella Corvi; Andre Levchenko; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.043

5.  A novel, integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens using human lymphoblastoid cells.

Authors:  Eleanor C Wilde; Katherine E Chapman; Leanne M Stannard; Anna L Seager; Katja Brüsehafer; Ume-Kulsoom Shah; James A Tonkin; M Rowan Brown; Jatin R Verma; Ann T Doherty; George E Johnson; Shareen H Doak; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 6.168

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.