Literature DB >> 26523731

Association of Off-label Drug Use and Adverse Drug Events in an Adult Population.

Tewodros Eguale1, David L Buckeridge2, Aman Verma3, Nancy E Winslade4, Andrea Benedetti3, James A Hanley5, Robyn Tamblyn2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Off-label use of prescription drugs has been identified as an important contributor to preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) in children. Despite concerns regarding adverse outcomes, to date, no systematic investigation of the effects of off-label drug use in adult populations has been performed.
OBJECTIVE: To monitor and evaluate off-label use of prescription drugs and its effect on ADEs in an adult population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 46,021 patients who received 151,305 incident prescribed drugs was assembled from primary care clinics in Quebec, Canada, using the Medical Office of the XXIst Century electronic health record, which supports documentation of treatment indications and treatment outcomes. Prescriptions dispensed from January 1, 2005, through December 30, 2009, were followed up from the date of the prescription to the date the drug use was discontinued, the end of treatment, or the end of follow-up (December 30, 2010). Data were analyzed from January 5, 2012, to March 15, 2015. EXPOSURES: Off-label prescription drug use with and without strong scientific evidence. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adverse drug events in off-label use with and without strong scientific evidence. Analysis used multivariate marginal Cox proportional hazards regression for clustered data with the drug as the unit of analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 3484 ADEs were found in the 46,021 study patients, with an incidence rate of 13.2 per 10,000 person-months. The rate of ADEs for off-label use (19.7 per 10,000 person-months) was higher than that for on-label use (12.5 per 10,000 person-months) (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.30-1.60). Off-label use lacking strong scientific evidence had a higher ADE rate (21.7 per 10,000 person-months) compared with on-label use (AHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.37-1.72). However, off-label use with strong scientific evidence had the same risk for ADEs as on-label use (AHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.88-1.38). The risks for ADEs were higher for drugs approved from 1981 to 1995 (14.4 per 10,000 person-months; AHR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.45-1.80) and for those used by women (14.3 per 10,000 person-months; AHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.28), patients receiving 5 to 7 drugs (12.1 per 10,000 person-months; AHR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.66-3.92), and patients receiving cardiovascular drugs (15.9 per 10,000 person-months; AHR, 3.30; 95% CI, 2.67-4.08) and anti-infectives (66.2 per 10,000 person-months; AHR, 6.33; 95% CI, 4.58-8.76). Patients with a 1-unit increase in the continuity of care index had a 19% increase in ADEs (AHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.26). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Off-label use of prescription drugs is associated with ADEs. Caution should be exercised in prescribing drugs for off-label uses that lack strong scientific evidence. Future electronic health records should be designed to enable postmarket surveillance of treatment indications and treatment outcomes to monitor the safety of on- and off-label uses of drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26523731     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  54 in total

1.  Innovation and off-label use, the French case and more.

Authors:  Alain Braillon; Joel Lexchin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Reply to "Innovation and off-label use, the French case and more" by Braillon and Lexchin.

Authors:  Jan Borysowski; Hans-Jörg Ehni; Andrzej Górski
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Ethics codes and use of new and innovative drugs.

Authors:  Jan Borysowski; Hans-Jörg Ehni; Andrzej Górski
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Accelerating development of scientific evidence for medical products within the existing US regulatory framework.

Authors:  Rachel E Sherman; Kathleen M Davies; Melissa A Robb; Nina L Hunter; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  FDA Revisits Rules on Drug and Device Communication: Will the Agency Relax Existing Industry-Opposed Restrictions?

Authors:  Stephen Barlas
Journal:  P T       Date:  2017-03

6.  The antipsychotic agent quetiapine is increasingly not used as such: dispensed prescriptions in Norway 2004-2015.

Authors:  Pål Gjerden; Jørgen G Bramness; Ingunn Fride Tvete; Lars Slørdal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Unwarranted claims of drug efficacy in pharmaceutical sales visits: are drugs approved on the basis of surrogate outcomes promoted appropriately?

Authors:  Roojin Habibi; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Anne Holbrook
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk to Guide Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Gregory D Curfman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Retrospective Cohort Study of the Prevalence of Off-label Gabapentinoid Prescriptions in Hospitalized Medical Patients.

Authors:  Marc-Alexandre Gingras; Anthony Lieu; Louise Papillon-Ferland; Todd C Lee; Emily G McDonald
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 2.960

10.  Off-label and unlicensed prescribing in Europe: implications for patients' informed consent and liability.

Authors:  Lise Aagaard; Kent Kristensen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.