Literature DB >> 2652334

The spine as an arch. A new mathematical model.

R M Aspden1.   

Abstract

A new model is presented for the static behavior of the human spine that considers it to work as an arch rather than the traditional view of a cantilever. This theory is based on limit criteria, derived from plasticity theory, which determine bounds within which the structure is mechanically stable and thereby enables the prediction of failure when these criteria are not satisfied. It is shown that theorems developed for the plastic analysis of masonry arches can be simply adapted for the spine. An analysis is performed of three postures and associated loads described in the literature. The forces and intradiscal pressures are calculated and shown to be in good agreement with published measurements. The results show that compressive stresses in the spine are not as high as was previously calculated and that the curvature of the spine is necessary for its load-bearing function. Preservation of the lumbar lordosis, in conjunction with intra-abdominal pressure, strengthens the spine and is crucial to protect the spine from injury when lifting heavy loads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2652334     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198903000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Trunk muscle coordination in reaction to load-release in a position without vertical postural demand.

Authors:  A E Martin Eriksson Crommert; Alf Thorstensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The intrinsic shape of the human lumbar spine in the supine, standing and sitting postures: characterization using an active shape model.

Authors:  Judith R Meakin; Jennifer S Gregory; Richard M Aspden; Francis W Smith; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Response of the end-plates to compression of the spine.

Authors:  A D Holmes; D W Hukins
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  D Grob; H J Scheier; J Dvorak; H Siegrist; M Rubeli; R Joller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  The lumbar spine has an intrinsic shape specific to each individual that remains a characteristic throughout flexion and extension.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Judith R Meakin; Kay Cooper; Rebecca J Barr; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The relationship between sagittal curvature and extensor muscle volume in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Judith R Meakin; Jonathan Fulford; Richard Seymour; Joanne R Welsman; Karen M Knapp
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur.

Authors:  K E Rudman; R M Aspden; J R Meakin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Relationships between lumbar inter-vertebral motion and lordosis in healthy adult males: a cross sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Alister du Rose; Alan Breen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Is intrinsic lumbar spine shape associated with lumbar disc degeneration? An exploratory study.

Authors:  Janet A Deane; Anastasia V Pavlova; Adrian K P Lim; Jennifer S Gregory; Richard M Aspden; Alison H McGregor
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Variation in lifting kinematics related to individual intrinsic lumbar curvature: an investigation in healthy adults.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Judith R Meakin; Kay Cooper; Rebecca J Barr; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.