Literature DB >> 26523073

Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research.

Joanna E M Sale1, Lynne H Lohfeld2, Kevin Brazil3.   

Abstract

Health care research includes many studies that combine quantitative and qualitative methods. In this paper, we revisit the quantitative-qualitative debate and review the arguments for and against using mixed-methods. In addition, we discuss the implications stemming from our view, that the paradigms upon which the methods are based have a different view of reality and therefore a different view of the phenomenon under study. Because the two paradigms do not study the same phenomena, quantitative and qualitative methods cannot be combined for cross-validation or triangulation purposes. However, they can be combined for complementary purposes. Future standards for mixed-methods research should clearly reflect this recommendation.

Keywords:  mixed-methodology; qualitative methods; quantitative methods; quantitative-qualitative debate; scientific paradigms

Year:  2002        PMID: 26523073      PMCID: PMC4623759          DOI: 10.1023/A:1014301607592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Quant        ISSN: 0033-5177


  12 in total

1.  Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation.

Authors:  J M Morse
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research.

Authors:  D L Morgan
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  1998-05

3.  Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction.

Authors:  A Steckler; K R McLeroy; R M Goodman; S T Bird; L McCormick
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1992

Review 4.  Combining qualitative and quantitative research methods: considering the possibilities for enhancing the study of chronic diseases.

Authors:  A L Casebeer; M J Verhoef
Journal:  Chronic Dis Can       Date:  1997

5.  The problem of rigor in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.824

6.  Research blenders.

Authors:  J R Phillips
Journal:  Nurs Sci Q       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 0.883

7.  Reconciling paradigm assumptions of qualitative and quantitative research.

Authors:  J E Haase; S T Myers
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Research blenders: commentary and response. Transitions to new methodologies in nursing sciences.

Authors:  P N Clarke; P S Yaros
Journal:  Nurs Sci Q       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 0.883

9.  What we want: qualitative research. Promising frontier for family medicine.

Authors:  A J Reid
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Opening the black box: an encounter in the corridors of health services research.

Authors:  C Pope; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-30
View more
  48 in total

1.  Mapping hospice patients' perception and verbal communication of end-of-life needs: an exploratory mixed methods inquiry.

Authors:  Bruce L Arnold
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.234

2.  Culturally Safe Epidemiology: Oxymoron or Scientific Imperative.

Authors:  Mary Cameron; Neil Andersson; Ian McDowell; Robert J Ledogar
Journal:  Pimatisiwin       Date:  2010

3.  A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Kevin Brazil
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2004-08

4.  Investigating the use of NICE guidelines and IAPT services in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Alex Gyani; Neil Pumphrey; Hannah Parker; Roz Shafran; Suzanna Rose
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2012-09

5.  Understanding the experience of stroke: a mixed-method research agenda.

Authors:  Philippa Clarke
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-04-22

6.  Integrating mixed methods in health services and delivery system research.

Authors:  William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Michael I Harrison; Mary L Fennell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Validating a tool to assess eye health knowledge, attitude and practice in Cambodia and Vietnam.

Authors:  Noela Prasad; Gail M Ormsby; Robert P Finger
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Illumination with a Dim Bulb? What do social scientists learn by employing qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) in the service of multi-method designs?

Authors:  Michael J White; Maya D Judd; Simone Poliandri
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2012-08

9.  Seeking treatment for symptomatic malaria in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Carol P Davy; Elisa Sicuri; Maria Ome; Ellie Lawrence-Wood; Peter Siba; Gordon Warvi; Ivo Mueller; Lesong Conteh
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Levels of reconstruction as complementarity in mixed methods research: a social theory-based conceptual framework for integrating qualitative and quantitative research.

Authors:  Linda J Carroll; J Peter Rothe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.