Aravind Haripriya1, David F Chang2, Sathvik Namburar3, Anand Smita4, Ravilla D Ravindran4. 1. Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India. Electronic address: haripriya@aravind.org. 2. Altos Eye Physicians, Los Altos, California. 3. John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the rate of postoperative endophthalmitis before and after initiation of intracameral (IC) moxifloxacin for endophthalmitis prophylaxis in patients undergoing cataract surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, clinical registry. PARTICIPANTS: All charity and private patients (116 714 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery between February 15, 2014, and April 15, 2015, at the Madurai Aravind Eye Hospital were included. Group 1 consisted of 37 777 eyes of charity patients who did not receive IC moxifloxacin, group 2 consisted of 38 160 eyes of charity patients who received IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis, and group 3 consisted of 40 777 eyes of private patients who did not receive IC moxifloxacin. METHODS: The electronic health record data for each of the 3 groups were analyzed, and the postoperative endophthalmitis rates were statistically compared. The cost of endophthalmitis treatment (groups 1 and 2) and the cost of IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis (group 2) were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative endophthalmitis rate before and after initiation of IC moxifloxacin endophthalmitis treatment cost. RESULTS: Manual, sutureless, small incision cataract surgery (M-SICS) accounted for approximately all of the 75 937 cataract surgeries in the charity population (97%), but only a minority of the 40 777 private surgeries (21% M-SICS; 79% phacoemulsification). Thirty eyes in group 1 (0.08%) and 6 eyes in group 2 (0.02%) were diagnosed with postoperative endophthalmitis (P < 0.0001). The group 3 endophthalmitis rate was 0.07% (29 eyes), which was also higher than the second group's rate (P < 0.0001). There were no adverse events attributed to IC moxifloxacin in group 2. The total cost of treating the 30 patients with endophthalmitis in group 1 was virtually identical to the total combined cost in group 2 of routine IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis and treatment of the 6 endophthalmitis cases. CONCLUSIONS: Routine IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis achieved a highly significant, 4-fold reduction in postoperative endophthalmitis in patients undergoing M-SICS. Compared with previous studies, having such a high volume of patients undergoing surgery during a relatively short 14-month time period strengthens the conclusion. This study provides further evidence that moxifloxacin is an effective IC prophylactic antibiotic and suggests that IC antibiotics should be considered for M-SICS and phacoemulsification.
PURPOSE: To compare the rate of postoperative endophthalmitis before and after initiation of intracameral (IC) moxifloxacin for endophthalmitis prophylaxis in patients undergoing cataract surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, clinical registry. PARTICIPANTS: All charity and private patients (116 714 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery between February 15, 2014, and April 15, 2015, at the Madurai Aravind Eye Hospital were included. Group 1 consisted of 37 777 eyes of charity patients who did not receive IC moxifloxacin, group 2 consisted of 38 160 eyes of charity patients who received IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis, and group 3 consisted of 40 777 eyes of private patients who did not receive IC moxifloxacin. METHODS: The electronic health record data for each of the 3 groups were analyzed, and the postoperative endophthalmitis rates were statistically compared. The cost of endophthalmitis treatment (groups 1 and 2) and the cost of IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis (group 2) were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative endophthalmitis rate before and after initiation of IC moxifloxacinendophthalmitis treatment cost. RESULTS: Manual, sutureless, small incision cataract surgery (M-SICS) accounted for approximately all of the 75 937 cataract surgeries in the charity population (97%), but only a minority of the 40 777 private surgeries (21% M-SICS; 79% phacoemulsification). Thirty eyes in group 1 (0.08%) and 6 eyes in group 2 (0.02%) were diagnosed with postoperative endophthalmitis (P < 0.0001). The group 3 endophthalmitis rate was 0.07% (29 eyes), which was also higher than the second group's rate (P < 0.0001). There were no adverse events attributed to IC moxifloxacin in group 2. The total cost of treating the 30 patients with endophthalmitis in group 1 was virtually identical to the total combined cost in group 2 of routine IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis and treatment of the 6 endophthalmitis cases. CONCLUSIONS: Routine IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis achieved a highly significant, 4-fold reduction in postoperative endophthalmitis in patients undergoing M-SICS. Compared with previous studies, having such a high volume of patients undergoing surgery during a relatively short 14-month time period strengthens the conclusion. This study provides further evidence that moxifloxacin is an effective IC prophylactic antibiotic and suggests that IC antibiotics should be considered for M-SICS and phacoemulsification.