PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the needle size used for intravitreal (IVT) injections on patients' pain experience in a randomized, double-armed, single-blinded, clinical trial. METHODS: Patients included were randomized to have an IVT injection performed with a 27-gauge needle (group 1) or with a 30-gauge needle (group 2). The topical anaesthesia before the injection was standardized. Immediately after the injection, patients were asked to grade their pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. The main outcome measure was the pain score assessment. Cofactors analysed were patients' demographics (age and gender) and clinical characteristics (such as the number of previous IVT injections). In addition, scaled surgeon's questionnaires to assess the IVT injection procedure were evaluated. For statistical analysis, a regression model was used. RESULTS: The data of 208 patients (group 1: 104 patients; group 2: 104 patients) were analysed. There was no significant difference in the VAS pain scores (p > 0.18) and in the Wong-Baker pain scores (p > 0.59) between both treatment groups. Gender (p = 0.0288) and the number of previous IVT injections (p = 0.0028) significantly influenced the VAS pain scores (p < 0.05). Female patients and patients with a history of previousIVT injections had higher pain scores. The surgeon's questionnaire showed an overall preference towards the use of a 30-gauge needle for IVT injections. CONCLUSION: The use of a 30-gauge needle for IVT injections showed no significant effect in pain relief compared to the use of a 27-gauge needle. However, a 30-gauge needle was preferred by all surgeons.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the needle size used for intravitreal (IVT) injections on patients' pain experience in a randomized, double-armed, single-blinded, clinical trial. METHODS:Patients included were randomized to have an IVT injection performed with a 27-gauge needle (group 1) or with a 30-gauge needle (group 2). The topical anaesthesia before the injection was standardized. Immediately after the injection, patients were asked to grade their pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. The main outcome measure was the pain score assessment. Cofactors analysed were patients' demographics (age and gender) and clinical characteristics (such as the number of previous IVT injections). In addition, scaled surgeon's questionnaires to assess the IVT injection procedure were evaluated. For statistical analysis, a regression model was used. RESULTS: The data of 208 patients (group 1: 104 patients; group 2: 104 patients) were analysed. There was no significant difference in the VAS pain scores (p > 0.18) and in the Wong-Baker pain scores (p > 0.59) between both treatment groups. Gender (p = 0.0288) and the number of previous IVT injections (p = 0.0028) significantly influenced the VAS pain scores (p < 0.05). Female patients and patients with a history of previous IVT injections had higher pain scores. The surgeon's questionnaire showed an overall preference towards the use of a 30-gauge needle for IVT injections. CONCLUSION: The use of a 30-gauge needle for IVT injections showed no significant effect in pain relief compared to the use of a 27-gauge needle. However, a 30-gauge needle was preferred by all surgeons.
Authors: Jessica Gomez; Dara D Koozekanani; Alex Z Feng; Mitchell Holt; Paul Drayna; Melissa R Mackley; Frederik J G M van Kuijk; Robert M Beardsley; Richard H Johnston; Joseph M Terry; Sandra R Montezuma Journal: Ophthalmol Ther Date: 2016-08-02
Authors: Sanjar Batirovich Madrakhimov; Jin Young Yang; Dong Hyuck Ahn; Jung Woo Han; Tae Ho Ha; Tae Kwann Park Journal: Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 6.698