Literature DB >> 26521703

A bundle that includes active surveillance, contact precaution for carriers, and cefazolin-based antimicrobial prophylaxis prevents methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in clean orthopedic surgery.

Hideki Kawamura1, Kazuaki Matsumoto2, Akari Shigemi2, Michiyo Orita3, Aya Nakagawa3, Satoko Nozima4, Hiroyuki Tominaga5, Takao Setoguchi6, Setsuro Komiya5, Koichi Tokuda2, Junichiro Nishi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent cause of orthopedic surgical site infections (SSIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a bundle approach in the prevention of orthopedic MRSA SSIs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRSA active surveillance and decolonization were performed preoperatively at our institution from July 2004 until 2007. In January 2008, a bundle approach comprising contact precautions for MRSA-positive patients and cefazolin-based antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) stewardship was implemented. Data on the prevalence of MRSA SSIs, antimicrobial use density, duration of AMP, and the use of an alcohol antiseptic agent (L/1,000 patient-days) were evaluated during 2 periods: July 2004-December 2007 (period A) and January 2008-December 2012 (period B). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The MRSA SSI rate during period B (0.97%; 19 out of 1,966) was significantly lower than that during period A (2.17%; 29 out of 1,333; P = .003). The infection rate correlated negatively with both the cefazolin antimicrobial use density (r = -0.76; P = .0002) and the use of an alcohol antiseptic agent (r = -0.68; P = .002).
CONCLUSIONS: An infection-prevention bundle consisting of contact precautions for carriers and AMP stewardship in addition to active surveillance was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of orthopedic MRSA SSIs.
Copyright © 2016 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; Nasal screening; Orthopedic surgical site infection; Transmission

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26521703     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for surgical site infection and urinary tract infection after spine surgery.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tominaga; Takao Setoguchi; Yasuhiro Ishidou; Satoshi Nagano; Takuya Yamamoto; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Interprofessional Antimicrobial Stewardship Influencing Clostridioides difficile Infection: An 8-Year Study Using Antimicrobial Use Density.

Authors:  Junichi Yoshida; Tetsuya Kikuchi; Takako Ueno; Akiko Mataga; Ikuyo Asano; Kazuhiro Otani; Tetsuro Tamura; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Risk factors for unavoidable removal of instrumentation after surgical site infection of spine surgery: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tominaga; Takao Setoguchi; Hideki Kawamura; Ichiro Kawamura; Satoshi Nagano; Masahiko Abematsu; Fumito Tanabe; Yasuhiro Ishidou; Takuya Yamamoto; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Evidence of the medical and economic benefits of implementing hygiene measures by a prevention link physician in trauma surgery: Study protocol for a biphasic multicenter prospective interventional pre-post cohort study using a structured intervention bundle development and tools of behavior change management.

Authors:  Meike M Neuwirth; Benedikt Marche; Christiane Kugler; Dominik Bures; Dirk Sauerland; Swetlana Herbrandt; Uwe Ligges; Frauke Mattner; Robin Otchwemah
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-07-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.