Literature DB >> 26521686

RadPath: A Web-based System for Integrating and Correlating Radiology and Pathology Findings During Cancer Diagnosis.

Corey W Arnold1, W Dean Wallace2, Shawn Chen3, Andrea Oh3, Fereidoun Abtin3, Scott Genshaft3, Scott Binder2, Denise Aberle3, Dieter Enzmann3.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The current paradigm of cancer diagnosis involves uncoordinated communication of findings from radiology and pathology to downstream physicians. Discordance between these findings can require additional time from downstream users to resolve, or given incorrect resolution, may adversely impact treatment decisions. To mitigate this problem, we developed a web-based system, called RadPath, for correlating and integrating radiology and pathology reporting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: RadPath includes interfaces to our institution's clinical information systems, which are used to retrieve reports, images, and test results that are structured into an interactive compendium for a diagnostic patient case. The system includes an editing interface for physicians, allowing for the inclusion of additional clinical data, as well as the ability to retrospectively correlate and contextualize imaging findings following pathology diagnosis.
RESULTS: During pilot deployment and testing over the course of 1 year, physicians at our institution have completed 60 RadPath cases, requiring an average of 128 seconds from a radiologist and an average of 93 seconds from a pathologist per case. Several technical and workflow challenges were encountered during development, including interfacing with diverse clinical information systems, automatically structuring report contents, and determining the appropriate physicians to create RadPath summaries. Reaction to RadPath has been positive, with users valuing the system's ability to consolidate diagnostic information.
CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing complexity of medicine and the movement toward team-based disease management, there is a need for improved clinical communication and information exchange. RadPath provides a platform for generating coherent and correlated diagnostic summaries in cancer diagnosis with minimal additional effort from physicians.
Copyright © 2016 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer diagnosis; Clinical workflow; Integrated reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26521686     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sensor, Signal, and Imaging Informatics.

Authors:  W Hsu; S Park; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

2.  Evolution of lymphoma staging and response evaluation: current limitations and future directions.

Authors:  Joel Cunningham; Sunil Iyengar; Bhupinder Sharma
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Diffusion Restriction Comparison between Gleason 4 Fused Glands and Cribriform Glands within Patient Using Whole-Mount Prostate Pathology as Ground Truth.

Authors:  Savannah R Duenweg; Xi Fang; Samuel A Bobholz; Allison K Lowman; Michael Brehler; Fitzgerald Kyereme; Kenneth A Iczkowski; Kenneth M Jacobsohn; Anjishnu Banerjee; Peter S LaViolette
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  An Electronic Form for Reporting Results of Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Urology Integrated Diagnostic Report (Uro-IDR).

Authors:  Jacob Guorgui; Adam Kinnaird; Rajiv Jayadevan; Alan M Priester; Corey W Arnold; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Segmentation and Classification in Digital Pathology for Glioma Research: Challenges and Deep Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Tahsin Kurc; Spyridon Bakas; Xuhua Ren; Aditya Bagari; Alexandre Momeni; Yue Huang; Lichi Zhang; Ashish Kumar; Marc Thibault; Qi Qi; Qian Wang; Avinash Kori; Olivier Gevaert; Yunlong Zhang; Dinggang Shen; Mahendra Khened; Xinghao Ding; Ganapathy Krishnamurthi; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; James Davis; Tianhao Zhao; Rajarsi Gupta; Joel Saltz; Keyvan Farahani
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Defining current gaps in quality measures for cancer immunotherapy: consensus report from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) 2019 Quality Summit.

Authors:  Sara Pai; David Blaisdell; Rachel Brodie; Robert Carlson; Heidi Finnes; Michele Galioto; Roxanne E Jensen; Tom Valuck; Antonia R Sepulveda; Howard L Kaufman
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 13.751

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.