Literature DB >> 26521339

Cost Differences Between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Kathryn Fitch, Tyler Engel, Andrew Bochner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the cost difference between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery from a commercial payer perspective for colectomy, ventral hernia repair, thoracic resection (resection of the lung), and hysterectomy.
DESIGN: A retrospective claims data analysis was conducted using the 2011 and 2012 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter Database. Study eligibility criteria included age 18-64 years, pharmacy coverage, ≥ 1 month of eligibility in 2012, and a claim coded with 1 of the 4 surgical procedures of interest; the index year was 2012.
METHODOLOGY: Average allowed facility and professional costs were calculated during inpatient stay (or day of surgery for outpatient hysterectomy) and the 30 days after discharge for MIS vs open surgery. Cost difference was compared after adjusting for presence of cancer, geographic region, and risk profile (age, gender, and comorbidities).
RESULTS: In total, 46,386 cases in the 2012 MarketScan database represented one of the surgeries of interest. The difference in average allowed surgical procedure cost (facility and professional) between open surgery vs adjusted MIS was $10,204 for colectomy; $3,721, ventral hernia repair; $12,989, thoracic resection; and $1,174, noncancer hysterectomy (P < .001 for all comparisons).The difference in average allowed cost in the 30 days after surgery between open surgery vs adjusted MIS was $1,494 for colectomy, $1,320 for ventral hernia repair, negative $711 for thoracic resection, and negative $425 for noncancer hysterectomy (P < .001 for all comparisons, except P = .487 for thoracic resection).
CONCLUSION: MIS was associated with statistically significantly lower costs than open surgery for all 4 analyzed surgeries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26521339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Manag Care        ISSN: 1062-3388


  4 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted repair of complex ventral hernia: can it pay off?

Authors:  Bernhard Dauser; Nikolaus Hartig; Mariam Vedadinejad; Elisabeth Kirchner; Florian Trummer; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-04-10

2.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.

Authors:  Sara Monfared; Dimitrios I Athanasiadis; Luke Umana; Edward Hernandez; Hamed Asadi; Cameron L Colgate; Denny Yu; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Outcomes and Morbidity.

Authors:  James P Taylor; Miloslawa Stem; Azah A Althumairi; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Sandy H Fang; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Open versus minimally-invasive surgical techniques in pediatric renal tumors: A population-level analysis of in-hospital outcomes.

Authors:  Kirsten L Simmons; Jason C Chandrapal; Steven Wolf; Henry E Rice; Elisabeth E Tracy; Tamara Fitzgerald; Gina-Maria Pomann; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.921

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.