Literature DB >> 26520810

Comparison of the characteristics and mechanisms of Hg(II) sorption by biochars and activated carbon.

Xiaoyun Xu1, Ariette Schierz2, Nan Xu3, Xinde Cao4.   

Abstract

Two biochars were produced from bagasse and hickory chips (referred to as BB and HCB, respectively) and evaluated for their sorption ability of Hg(II) in aqueous solution. A commercial activated carbon (AC) which is commonly used for Hg(II) removal was included for comparison. Both biochars showed higher sorption capacities than AC, following the trend of BB>HCB>AC. The sorption of Hg(II) by BB and AC was mainly attributed to the formation of (COO)2Hg(II) and (O)2Hg(II). As a result, the adsorption capacity of Hg(II) by BB decreased 17.6% and 37.6% after COOH and OH were blocked, respectively and that of Hg(II) by AC decreased 6.63% and 62.2% for COOH and OH hindered, respectively. However, blocking the function groups had little effect on the Hg removal by HCB since sorption of Hg(II) by HCB was mainly resulted from the π electrons of CC and CO induced Hg-π binding. Further X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis indicated the possibility of reduction of the Hg(II) to Hg(I) by phenol groups or π electrons during the removal of Hg(II) by both biochars. In conclusion, biochar is more effective than activated carbon in removing Hg(II) and there exists a high potential that biochar can be a substitute of activated carbon for removal of Hg(II) from wastewater.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochar; Functional groups; Mercury; Reduction; Sorption

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26520810     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0021-9797            Impact factor:   8.128


  8 in total

1.  Remediation of cadmium contaminated water and soil using vinegar residue biochar.

Authors:  Yuxin Li; Guangpeng Pei; Xianliang Qiao; Yuen Zhu; Hua Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Evaluation of biochars from different stock materials as carriers of bacterial strain for remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Hongwen Sun; Xinhao Ren; Bing Li; Hongjun Mao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Characterizing Biochar as Alternative Sorbent for Oil Spill Remediation.

Authors:  Ludovica Silvani; Blanka Vrchotova; Petr Kastanek; Katerina Demnerova; Ida Pettiti; Marco Petrangeli Papini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Recent advances in biochar application for water and wastewater treatment: a review.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wang; Zizhang Guo; Zhen Hu; Jian Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Adsorption-assisted decontamination of Hg(ii) from aqueous solution by multi-functionalized corncob-derived biochar.

Authors:  Jianguo Bao; Han Zheng; Haseeb Tufail; Sana Irshad; Jiangkun Du
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Removal and Mechanism of Cadmium, Lead and Copper in Water by Functional Modification of Silkworm Excrement Biochar.

Authors:  Pengyang Bian; Yixuan Liu; Xiaoqin Zheng; Weibo Shen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.967

7.  Mercury Removal from Contaminated Water by Wood-Based Biochar Depends on Natural Organic Matter and Ionic Composition.

Authors:  Sampriti Chaudhuri; Gabriel Sigmund; Sharon E Bone; Naresh Kumar; Thilo Hofmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 11.357

8.  Physicochemical Characterization of Cherry Pits-Derived Biochar.

Authors:  Vladimír Frišták; Diana Bošanská; Martin Pipíška; Libor Ďuriška; Stephen M Bell; Gerhard Soja
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.