INTRODUCTION: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends for adults alcohol screening and brief behavioral counseling interventions in primary care settings. However, there is a paucity of population-based data on the prevalence of alcohol screening. This study examines adherence to this U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation by estimating the prevalence of alcohol screening by demographic characteristics and binge drinking. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in 2013 and 2014 on data from the 2013 fall wave of the ConsumerStyles survey. ConsumerStyles is drawn from an Internet panel randomly recruited by probability-based sampling to be representative of the U.S. POPULATION: Data from 2,592 adult respondents who visited primary care physicians in the last year were analyzed to determine the prevalence of alcohol screening. RESULTS: Only 24.7% of respondents reported receiving alcohol screening. The prevalence of screening was similar among women (24.9%) and men (24.5%). Black non-Hispanics reported a significantly lower prevalence of screening than white non-Hispanics (16.2% vs 26.9%, prevalence ratio=0.60, 95% CI=0.40, 0.90). College graduates reported a significantly higher prevalence of screening than respondents with a high school degree or less (28.1% vs 20.8%, prevalence ratio=1.35, 95% CI=1.08, 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Only about one in four respondents who visited a primary care physician in the last year reported being screened for alcohol misuse. Therefore, many men and women who misuse alcohol are unlikely to be identified. Increased screening may help reduce alcohol misuse and related negative health outcomes. Published by Elsevier Inc.
INTRODUCTION: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends for adults alcohol screening and brief behavioral counseling interventions in primary care settings. However, there is a paucity of population-based data on the prevalence of alcohol screening. This study examines adherence to this U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation by estimating the prevalence of alcohol screening by demographic characteristics and binge drinking. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in 2013 and 2014 on data from the 2013 fall wave of the ConsumerStyles survey. ConsumerStyles is drawn from an Internet panel randomly recruited by probability-based sampling to be representative of the U.S. POPULATION: Data from 2,592 adult respondents who visited primary care physicians in the last year were analyzed to determine the prevalence of alcohol screening. RESULTS: Only 24.7% of respondents reported receiving alcohol screening. The prevalence of screening was similar among women (24.9%) and men (24.5%). Black non-Hispanics reported a significantly lower prevalence of screening than white non-Hispanics (16.2% vs 26.9%, prevalence ratio=0.60, 95% CI=0.40, 0.90). College graduates reported a significantly higher prevalence of screening than respondents with a high school degree or less (28.1% vs 20.8%, prevalence ratio=1.35, 95% CI=1.08, 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Only about one in four respondents who visited a primary care physician in the last year reported being screened for alcohol misuse. Therefore, many men and women who misuse alcohol are unlikely to be identified. Increased screening may help reduce alcohol misuse and related negative health outcomes. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Dale W Stovall; Meredith B Loveless; Nikki A Walden; Nicole Karjane; Steve A Cohen Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Mary K Ethen; Tunu A Ramadhani; Angela E Scheuerle; Mark A Canfield; Diego F Wyszynski; Charlotte M Druschel; Paul A Romitti Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2008-03-04
Authors: William R Corbin; Suzanne Zalewski; Robert F Leeman; Benjamin A Toll; Lisa M Fucito; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.928
Authors: Marissa B Esser; Sarra L Hedden; Dafna Kanny; Robert D Brewer; Joseph C Gfroerer; Timothy S Naimi Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Maria C Mirabelli; Tegan K Boehmer; Scott A Damon; Kanta D Sircar; Hilary K Wall; Fuyuen Y Yip; Hatice S Zahran; Paul L Garbe Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sarah K Moore; Elizabeth C Saunders; Emily Hichborn; Bethany McLeman; Andrea Meier; Robyn Young; Noah Nesin; Sarah Farkas; Leah Hamilton; Lisa A Marsch; Trip Gardner; Jennifer McNeely Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Colin Angus; Jamie Brown; Emma Beard; Duncan Gillespie; Penelope Buykx; Eileen F S Kaner; Susan Michie; Petra Meier Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 2.692