Literature DB >> 26520419

Significance of a minor high-grade component in a low-grade noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma of bladder.

Leonardo O Reis1, Diana Taheri2, Alcides Chaux3, Gunes Guner4, Maria A Mendoza Rodriguez4, Trinity J Bivalacqua5, Mark P Schoenberg6, Jonathan I Epstein1, George J Netto7.   

Abstract

To assess the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of the presence of 5% or less high-grade component in otherwise low-grade noninvasive bladder urothelial carcinoma, referred to as mixed-grade (MG) urothelial carcinoma, we reviewed all archival cases with such diagnosis between 2005 and 2014. Clinicopathological and outcome parameters were compared to those in our previously reported low- and high-grade noninvasive bladder urothelial carcinoma cohorts (LGUC and HGUC, respectively). The study included 31 MG urothelial carcinomas. Mean patient age was 67.6 years, and mean follow-up was 39.7 months. Intravesical treatment was administered in 15 patients (48.4%). Recurrence occurred in 14 cases (45.2%): 10 as LGUC and 4 as HGUC; there was no stage progression. Mean time to progression was 9 months (5-17 months), and there was no death of disease. MG urothelial carcinoma stage progression and dead of disease rates were comparable to that of LGUC. MG urothelial carcinoma stage progression was significantly lower than that of HGUC, P = .002, using Pearson χ(2) test. MG urothelial carcinoma patients with no intravesical treatment had higher incidence rate of grade progression (25%) compared to LGUC patients (7.9%); however, the difference was not statistically significant. MG urothelial carcinoma had a prognosis closer to "pure" LGUC than "pure" HGUC. Untreated MG urothelial carcinoma may have a higher rate of grade progression than LGUC, although more data are needed before this issue can be definitively addressed. Until such data are available, it is reasonable to keep MG urothelial carcinoma as a distinct grade category with potential management implications.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High grade; Intravesical treatment; Low grade; Mixed; Non-invasive urothelial carcinoma; Progression; pTa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26520419     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  6 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to bladder cancer pathology.

Authors:  Eva Compérat; Justine Varinot; Julien Moroch; Caroline Eymerit-Morin; Fadi Brimo
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Noninvasive low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma with degenerative nuclear atypia: a grading pitfall.

Authors:  Andres Matoso; Vamsi Parimi; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  Educational Case: Urothelial Carcinoma: An Overview of Pathologic Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan Willner; Ammar Matloob; Anges Colanta; Samer N Khader
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2020-09-30

4.  The Clinical Impact of Tumor Grade Heterogeneity in Non-muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Authors:  Meftun Culpan; Ferhat Keser; Ayberk Iplikci; Gozde Kir; Gokhan Atis; Asif Yildirim
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2021-12-19

Review 5.  Bladder Cancer Sample Handling and Reporting: Pathologist's Point of View.

Authors:  Roberta Mazzucchelli; Daniela Marzioni; Giovanni Tossetta; Laura Pepi; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-02

6.  Presence and predominance of histological grade 3 define cT1HG bladder cancer prognostic groups.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Luciana S B Dal Col; Diego M Capibaribe; Gustavo B de Mendonça; Fernandes Denardi; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.