Literature DB >> 26520270

Exposure of native bees foraging in an agricultural landscape to current-use pesticides.

Michelle L Hladik1, Mark Vandever2, Kelly L Smalling3.   

Abstract

The awareness of insects as pollinators and indicators of environmental quality has grown in recent years, partially in response to declines in honey bee (Apis mellifera) populations. While most pesticide research has focused on honey bees, there has been less work on native bee populations. To determine the exposure of native bees to pesticides, bees were collected from an existing research area in northeastern Colorado in both grasslands (2013-2014) and wheat fields (2014). Traps were deployed bi-monthly during the summer at each land cover type and all bees, regardless of species, were composited as whole samples and analyzed for 136 current-use pesticides and degradates. This reconnaissance approach provides a sampling of all species and represents overall pesticide exposure (internal and external). Nineteen pesticides and degradates were detected in 54 composite samples collected. Compounds detected in >2% of the samples included: insecticides thiamethoxam (46%), bifenthrin (28%), clothianidin (24%), chlorpyrifos (17%), imidacloprid (13%), fipronil desulfinyl (7%; degradate); fungicides azoxystrobin (17%), pyraclostrobin (11%), fluxapyroxad (9%), and propiconazole (9%); herbicides atrazine (19%) and metolachlor (9%). Concentrations ranged from 1 to 310 ng/g for individual pesticides. Pesticides were detected in samples collected from both grasslands and wheat fields; the location of the sample and the surrounding land cover at the 1000 m radius influenced the pesticides detected but because of a small number of temporally comparable samples, correlations between pesticide concentration and land cover were not significant. The results show native bees collected in an agricultural landscape are exposed to multiple pesticides, these results can direct future research on routes/timing of pesticide exposure and the design of future conservation efforts for pollinators. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agroecosystems; Crop production; Native bees; Pesticides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26520270     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  23 in total

1.  Combined exposure to sublethal concentrations of an insecticide and a fungicide affect feeding, ovary development and longevity in a solitary bee.

Authors:  Fabio Sgolastra; Xavier Arnan; Riccardo Cabbri; Gloria Isani; Piotr Medrzycki; Dariusz Teper; Jordi Bosch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Lethal and sublethal effects, and incomplete clearance of ingested imidacloprid in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Luc Belzunces; Jean-Marc Bonmatin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013.

Authors:  Thomas James Wood; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors.

Authors:  Prarthana S Dharampal; Caitlin M Carlson; Luis Diaz-Garcia; Shawn A Steffan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  QSAR modeling in ecotoxicological risk assessment: application to the prediction of acute contact toxicity of pesticides on bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Mabrouk Hamadache; Othmane Benkortbi; Salah Hanini; Abdeltif Amrane
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Biochemical and histological biomarkers in the midgut of Apis mellifera from polluted environment at Beheira Governorate, Egypt.

Authors:  Ahmed M Abu El-Saad; Dalia A Kheirallah; Lamia M El-Samad
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Landscape-scale drivers of pollinator communities may depend on land-use configuration.

Authors:  Mark A K Gillespie; Mathilde Baude; Jacobus Biesmeijer; Nigel Boatman; Giles E Budge; Andrew Crowe; Nancy Davies; Rebecca Evans; Jane Memmott; R Daniel Morton; Ellen Moss; Mark Murphy; Stephane Pietravalle; Simon G Potts; Stuart P M Roberts; Clare Rowland; Deepa Senapathi; Simon M Smart; Claire Wood; William E Kunin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  Imidacloprid alters ant sociobehavioral traits at environmentally relevant concentrations.

Authors:  James D Sappington
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  The use of pesticides in Polish agriculture after integrated pest management (IPM) implementation.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Piwowar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Importance of Ecological Factors and Colony Handling for Optimizing Health Status of Apiaries in Mediterranean Ecosystems.

Authors:  Irene Asensio; Marina Vicente-Rubiano; María Jesús Muñoz; Eduardo Fernández-Carrión; José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno; Matilde Carballo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.