Literature DB >> 26520262

Assessing irrigated agriculture's surface water and groundwater consumption by combining satellite remote sensing and hydrologic modelling.

Jorge L Peña-Arancibia1, Mohammed Mainuddin2, John M Kirby2, Francis H S Chiew2, Tim R McVicar2, Jai Vaze2.   

Abstract

Globally, irrigation accounts for more than two thirds of freshwater demand. Recent regional and global assessments indicate that groundwater extraction (GWE) for irrigation has increased more rapidly than surface water extraction (SWE), potentially resulting in groundwater depletion. Irrigated agriculture in semi-arid and arid regions is usually from a combination of stored surface water and groundwater. This paper assesses the usefulness of remotely-sensed (RS) derived information on both irrigation dynamics and rates of actual evapotranspiration which are both input to a river-reach water balance model in order to quantify irrigation water use and water provenance (either surface water or groundwater). The assessment is implemented for the water-years 2004/05-2010/11 in five reaches of the Murray-Darling Basin (Australia); a heavily regulated basin with large irrigated areas and periodic droughts and floods. Irrigated area and water use are identified each water-year (from July to June) through a Random Forest model which uses RS vegetation phenology and actual evapotranspiration as predicting variables. Both irrigated areas and actual evapotranspiration from irrigated areas were compared against published estimates of irrigated areas and total water extraction (SWE+GWE).The river-reach model determines the irrigated area that can be serviced with stored surface water (SWE), and the remainder area (as determined by the Random Forest Model) is assumed to be supplemented by groundwater (GWE). Model results were evaluated against observed SWE and GWE. The modelled SWE generally captures the observed interannual patterns and to some extent the magnitudes, with Pearson's correlation coefficients >0.8 and normalised root-mean-square-error<30%. In terms of magnitude, the results were as accurate as or better than those of more traditional (i.e., using areas that fluctuate based on water resource availability and prescribed crop factors) irrigation modelling. The RS irrigated areas and actual evapotranspiration can be used to: (i) understand irrigation dynamics, (ii) constrain irrigation models in data scarce regions, as well as (iii) pinpointing areas that require better ground-based monitoring. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diversions; Evapotranspiration; Hydrology; Image classification; Mapping; Murray–Darling basin; Random forest

Year:  2015        PMID: 26520262     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  Direct or Spillover Effect: The Impact of Pure Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Water Use on Water Scarcity in China.

Authors:  Min Li; Kaisheng Long
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Using HJ-CCD image and PLS algorithm to estimate the yield of field-grown winter wheat.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhang; Xin-Xing Zhou; Zhi-Xiang Wang; Wei Mao; Wen-Xi Li; Fei Yun; Wen-Shan Guo; Chang-Wei Tan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.