Literature DB >> 26520053

Distribution pattern and number of ticks on lizards.

Krzysztof Dudek1, Piotr Skórka2, Zofia Anna Sajkowska3, Anna Ekner-Grzyb4, Monika Dudek5, Piotr Tryjanowski6.   

Abstract

The success of ectoparasites depends primarily on the site of attachment and body condition of their hosts. Ticks usually tend to aggregate on vertebrate hosts in specific areas, but the distribution pattern may depend on host body size and condition, sex, life stage or skin morphology. Here, we studied the distribution of ticks on lizards and tested the following hypothesis: occurrence or high abundance of ticks is confined with body parts with smaller scales and larger interscalar length because such sites should provide ticks with superior attachment conditions. This study was performed in field conditions in central Poland in 2008-2011. In total, 500 lizards (Lacerta agilis) were caught and 839 ticks (Ixodes ricinus, larvae and nymphs) were collected from them. Using generalised linear mixed models, we found that the ticks were most abundant on forelimbs and their axillae, with 90% of ticks attached there. This part of the lizard body and the region behind the hindlimb were covered by the smallest scales with relatively wide gaps between them. This does not fully support our hypothesis that ticks prefer locations with easy access to skin between scales, because it does not explain why so few ticks were in the hindlimb area. We found that the abundance of ticks was positively correlated with lizard body size index (snout-vent length). Tick abundance was also higher in male and mature lizards than in female and young individuals. Autotomy had no effect on tick abundance. We found no correlation between tick size and lizard morphology, sex, autotomy and body size index. The probability of occurrence of dead ticks was positively linked with the total number of ticks on the lizard but there was no relationship between dead tick presence and lizard size, sex or age. Thus lizard body size and sex are the major factors affecting the abundance of ticks, and these parasites are distributed nearly exclusively on the host's forelimbs and their axillae.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dead ticks; Distribution; Ectoparasites; Ixodes ricinus; Lacerta agilis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26520053     DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis        ISSN: 1877-959X            Impact factor:   3.744


  5 in total

1.  Importance of Common Wall Lizards in the Transmission Dynamics of Tick-Borne Pathogens in the Northern Apennine Mountains, Italy.

Authors:  Laura Tomassone; L A Ceballos; C Ragagli; E Martello; R De Sousa; M C Stella; A Mannelli
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Phenological variation in parasite load and inflammatory response in a lizard with an asynchronous reproductive cycle.

Authors:  Jimena Rivera-Rea; J Carlos González-Morales; Víctor Fajardo; Rodrigo Megía-Palma; Elizabeth Bastiaans; Javier Manjarrez
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2022-06-25

3.  Opposed elevational variation in prevalence and intensity of endoparasites and their vectors in a lizard.

Authors:  Lola Álvarez-Ruiz; Rodrigo Megía-Palma; Senda Reguera; Santiago Ruiz; Francisco J Zamora-Camacho; Jordi Figuerola; Gregorio Moreno-Rueda
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.624

4.  Host sex, size, and hemoparasite infection influence the effects of ectoparasitic burdens on free-ranging iguanas.

Authors:  Charles R Knapp; Caro Perez-Heydrich; Trevor T Zachariah; Jill Jollay; Amy N Schnelle; Sandra D Buckner; Christine R Lattin; L Michael Romero
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Constant and seasonal drivers of bird communities in a wind farm: implications for conservation.

Authors:  Zuzanna M Rosin; Piotr Skórka; Paweł Szymański; Marcin Tobolka; Andrzej Luczak; Piotr Tryjanowski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.