Impact of Carvedilol versus β1-selective β blockers (bisoprolol, metoprolol, and nebivolol) in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Although β blocker (BB) has constituted one of the mainstays of evidence-based therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the comparative efficacy of different BBs remains uncertain. We sought to determine the comparative effectiveness of nonselective BB carvedilol and the most frequently prescribed β1-selective BBs (bisoprolol, metoprolol, and nebivolol) in patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 7,863 patients were selected from the prospective national AMI registry, and patients were divided into carvedilol group (n = 6,231) and β1-selective BB group (n = 1,632) at hospital discharge. The primary end point was all-cause death or MI during follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 243 ± 144 days, all-cause death or MI occurred in 94 patients (1.5%) in the carvedilol group versus 31 patients (1.9%) in the β1-selective BB group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 1.22, p = 0.32). This result was consistent across various risk subgroups. The risks of all-cause death, cardiac death, and MI were also similar between the groups. After propensity-score matching, no difference was observed in the rate of all-cause death or MI (1.7% in the carvedilol vs 1.9% in the β1-selective BB group, adjusted hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.46, p = 0.55). In conclusion, no differences in the risk of all-cause death or MI were observed between the carvedilol and β1-selective BB groups in contemporary practice of the treatment for AMI.