Sushil Tripathi1, Edouard J Trabulsi2, Leonard Gomella2, Sung Kim1, Peter McCue3, Charles Intenzo1, Ruth Birbe3, Ashish Gandhe1, Pardeep Kumar1, Mathew Thakur4. 1. Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: madhukar.thakur@jefferson.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (64)Cu-TP3805 as a novel biomolecule, to positron emission tomography (PET) image prostate cancer (PC), at the onset of which VPAC1, the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors, is expressed in high density on PC cells, but not on normal cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were PET/X-ray computerized tomography imaged preoperatively with (64)Cu-TP3805. Standardized maximum uptake (SUVmax) values were determined and malignant lesions (standardized uptake value > 1.0) counted, and compared with histologic findings. Whole-mount pathology slides from 6 VPAC1 PET imaged patients, 3 benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, 1 malignant and 1 benign lymph node underwent digital autoradiography (DAR) after (64)Cu-TP3805 incubation and were compared to hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides. RESULTS: In 25 patients who underwent PET imaging, 212 prostate gland lesions had SUVmax > 1.0 vs 127 lesions identified by histology of biopsy tissues. The status of the additional 85 PET identified prostate lesions remains to be determined. In 68 histologic slides from 6 PET imaged patients, DAR identified 105 of 107 PC foci, 19 of 19 high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias, and ejaculatory ducts and verumontanum involved with cancer. Additionally, DAR found 9 PC lesions not previously identified histologically. The positive and negative lymph nodes were correctly identified, and in 3 of 3 benign prostatic hyperplasia patients and 5 of 5 cysts, DAR was negative. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study demonstrated that (64)Cu-TP3805 delineates PC in vivo and ex vivo, provided normal images for benign masses, and is worthy of further studies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (64)Cu-TP3805 as a novel biomolecule, to positron emission tomography (PET) image prostate cancer (PC), at the onset of which VPAC1, the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors, is expressed in high density on PC cells, but not on normal cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were PET/X-ray computerized tomography imaged preoperatively with (64)Cu-TP3805. Standardized maximum uptake (SUVmax) values were determined and malignant lesions (standardized uptake value > 1.0) counted, and compared with histologic findings. Whole-mount pathology slides from 6 VPAC1 PET imaged patients, 3 benign prostatic hyperplasiapatients, 1 malignant and 1 benign lymph node underwent digital autoradiography (DAR) after (64)Cu-TP3805 incubation and were compared to hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides. RESULTS: In 25 patients who underwent PET imaging, 212 prostate gland lesions had SUVmax > 1.0 vs 127 lesions identified by histology of biopsy tissues. The status of the additional 85 PET identified prostate lesions remains to be determined. In 68 histologic slides from 6 PET imaged patients, DAR identified 105 of 107 PC foci, 19 of 19 high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias, and ejaculatory ducts and verumontanum involved with cancer. Additionally, DAR found 9 PC lesions not previously identified histologically. The positive and negative lymph nodes were correctly identified, and in 3 of 3 benign prostatic hyperplasiapatients and 5 of 5 cysts, DAR was negative. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study demonstrated that (64)Cu-TP3805 delineates PC in vivo and ex vivo, provided normal images for benign masses, and is worthy of further studies.
Authors: Mathew L Thakur; Kaijun Zhang; Adam Berger; Barbara Cavanaugh; Sung Kim; Chaitra Channappa; Andrea J Frangos; Eric Wickstrom; Charles M Intenzo Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Zsolt Szabo; Esther Mena; Steven P Rowe; Donika Plyku; Rosa Nidal; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Hong Fan; Robert F Dannals; Ying Chen; Ronnie C Mease; Melin Vranesic; Akrita Bhatnagar; George Sgouros; Steve Y Cho; Martin G Pomper Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Matthias Eiber; Tobias Maurer; Michael Souvatzoglou; Ambros J Beer; Alexander Ruffani; Bernhard Haller; Frank-Philipp Graner; Hubert Kübler; Uwe Haberkorn; Michael Eisenhut; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ana Valdehita; Ana M Bajo; Ana B Fernández-Martínez; M Isabel Arenas; Eva Vacas; Pedro Valenzuela; Antonio Ruíz-Villaespesa; Juan C Prieto; María J Carmena Journal: Peptides Date: 2010-08-05 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Mathew L Thakur; Devakumar Devadhas; Kaijun Zhang; Richard G Pestell; Chenguang Wang; Peter McCue; Eric Wickstrom Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Marc A Bjurlin; H Ballentine Carter; Paul Schellhammer; Michael S Cookson; Leonard G Gomella; Dean Troyer; Thomas M Wheeler; Steven Schlossberg; David F Penson; Samir S Taneja Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: A Afshar-Oromieh; A Malcher; M Eder; M Eisenhut; H G Linhart; B A Hadaschik; T Holland-Letz; F L Giesel; C Kratochwil; S Haufe; U Haberkorn; C M Zechmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Edouard J Trabulsi; Sushil K Tripathi; Leonard Gomella; Charalambos Solomides; Eric Wickstrom; Mathew L Thakur Journal: BJU Int Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Sushil K Tripathi; Rhonda Kean; Emily Bongiorno; Douglas C Hooper; Yuan-Yuan Jin; Eric Wickstrom; Peter A McCue; Mathew L Thakur Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Sushil K Tripathi; Pardeep Kumar; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Peter A McCue; Charles Intenzo; Adam Berger; Leonard Gomella; Mathew L Thakur Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Esther Mena; Peter C Black; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Michael Gorin; Mohamad Allaf; Peter Choyke Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.226