Literature DB >> 26519239

A paired comparison between glioblastoma "stem cells" and differentiated cells.

Matthias Schneider1,2, Stephanie Ströbele1,2, Lisa Nonnenmacher1, Markus D Siegelin3, Melanie Tepper4, Sebastien Stroh1, Sebastian Hasslacher1, Stefanie Enzenmüller1, Gudrun Strauss1, Bernd Baumann4, Georg Karpel-Massler2,3, Mike-Andrew Westhoff1, Klaus-Michael Debatin1, Marc-Eric Halatsch2.   

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSC) have been postulated to be responsible for the key features of a malignancy and its maintenances, as well as therapy resistance, while differentiated cells are believed to make up the rapidly growing tumour bulk. It is therefore important to understand the characteristics of those two distinct cell populations in order to devise treatment strategies which effectively target both cohorts, in particular with respect to cancers, such as glioblastoma. Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumour in adults, with a mean patient survival of 12-15 months. Importantly, therapeutic improvements have not been forthcoming in the last decade. In this study we compare key features of three pairs of glioblastoma cell populations, each pair consisting of stem cell-like and differentiated cells derived from an individual patient. Our data suggest that while growth rates and expression of key survival- and apoptosis-mediating proteins are more similar according to differentiation status than genetic similarity, we found no intrinsic differences in response to standard therapeutic interventions, namely exposure to radiation or the alkylating agent temozolomide. Interestingly, we could demonstrate that both stem cell-like and differentiated cells possess the ability to form stem cell-containing tumours in immunocompromised mice and that differentiated cells could potentially be dedifferentiated to potential stem cells. Taken together our data suggest that the differences between tumour stem cell and differentiated cell are particular fluent in glioblastoma.
© 2015 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain tumour; cancer stem cell; glioblastoma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26519239     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  20 in total

1.  Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibition predominantly synergistically enhances the anti-neoplastic activity of a low-dose CUSP9 repurposed drug regime against glioblastoma.

Authors:  Marc-Eric Halatsch; Richard Eric Kast; Annika Dwucet; Michal Hlavac; Tim Heiland; Mike-Andrew Westhoff; Klaus-Michael Debatin; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Markus David Siegelin; Georg Karpel-Massler
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Combined inhibition of RAC1 and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL synergistically induces glioblastoma cell death through down-regulation of the Usp9X/Mcl-1 axis.

Authors:  Michal Hlavac; Annika Dwucet; Richard Eric Kast; Jens Engelke; Mike-Andrew Westhoff; Markus D Siegelin; Klaus-Michael Debatin; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Marc-Eric Halatsch; Georg Karpel-Massler
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 3.  Novel ablation methods for treatment of gliomas.

Authors:  Brittanie Partridge; John H Rossmeisl; Alexandra M Kaloss; Erwin Kristobal Gudenschwager Basso; Michelle H Theus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Anti-glioma Activity of Dapsone and Its Enhancement by Synthetic Chemical Modification.

Authors:  Georg Karpel-Massler; Richard E Kast; Markus D Siegelin; Annika Dwucet; Elisabeth Schneider; Mike-Andrew Westhoff; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Xiao Yun Chen; Marc-Eric Halatsch; Carsten Bolm
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Viability of glioblastoma stem cells is effectively reduced by diisothiocyanate-derived mercapturic acids.

Authors:  Kamila Cwiklowska; Mike-Andrew Westhoff; Simon Freisinger; Annika Dwucet; Marc-Eric Halatsch; Uwe Knippschild; Klaus-Michael Debatin; Reinhold Schirmbeck; Lukasz Winiarski; Jozef Oleksyszyn; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Timo Burster
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Meclofenamate causes loss of cellular tethering and decoupling of functional networks in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Matthias Schneider; Lea Vollmer; Anna-Laura Potthoff; Vidhya M Ravi; Bernd O Evert; Mohummad A Rahman; Shahin Sarowar; Jan Kueckelhaus; Paulina Will; David Zurhorst; Kevin Joseph; Julian P Maier; Nicolas Neidert; Paolo d'Errico; Melanie Meyer-Luehmann; Ulrich G Hofmann; Andreas Dolf; Paolo Salomoni; Erdem Güresir; Per Ø Enger; Martha Chekenya; Torsten Pietsch; Patrick Schuss; Oliver Schnell; Mike-Andrew Westhoff; Jürgen Beck; Hartmut Vatter; Andreas Waha; Ulrich Herrlinger; Dieter H Heiland
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Radioresistance of mesenchymal glioblastoma initiating cells correlates with patient outcome and is associated with activation of inflammatory program.

Authors:  Elisabetta Stanzani; Fina Martínez-Soler; Teresa Martín Mateos; Noemi Vidal; Alberto Villanueva; Miquel Angel Pujana; Jordi Serra-Musach; Núria de la Iglesia; Pepita Giménez-Bonafé; Avelina Tortosa
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-03

8.  The effects of PI3K-mediated signalling on glioblastoma cell behaviour.

Authors:  Julia Langhans; Lukas Schneele; Nancy Trenkler; Hélène von Bandemer; Lisa Nonnenmacher; Georg Karpel-Massler; Markus D Siegelin; Shaoxia Zhou; Marc-Eric Halatsch; Klaus-Michael Debatin; Mike-Andrew Westhoff
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 7.485

Review 9.  NF-κB Signalling in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Vincent Soubannier; Stefano Stifani
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 10.  Cancer Stem Cell Hierarchy in Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Amy Bradshaw; Agadha Wickremsekera; Swee T Tan; Lifeng Peng; Paul F Davis; Tinte Itinteang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.