Literature DB >> 26519173

False Discovery Rate Estimation in Proteomics.

Suruchi Aggarwal1, Amit Kumar Yadav2.   

Abstract

With the advancement in proteomics separation techniques and improvements in mass analyzers, the data generated in a mass-spectrometry based proteomics experiment is rising exponentially. Such voluminous datasets necessitate automated computational tools for high-throughput data analysis and appropriate statistical control. The data is searched using one or more of the several popular database search algorithms. The matches assigned by these tools can have false positives and statistical validation of these false matches is necessary before making any biological interpretations. Without such procedures, the biological inferences do not hold true and may be outright misleading. There is a considerable overlap between true and false positives. To control the false positives amongst a set of accepted matches, there is a need for some statistical estimate that can reflect the amount of false positives present in the data processed. False discovery rate (FDR) is the metric for global confidence assessment of a large-scale proteomics dataset. This chapter covers the basics of FDR, its application in proteomics, and methods to estimate FDR.

Keywords:  False discovery rate; Peptide spectrum matches; Posterior error probability; Shotgun proteomics; Statistical validation; Target-decoy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26519173     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3106-4_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  9 in total

Review 1.  Middle-down proteomics: a still unexploited resource for chromatin biology.

Authors:  Simone Sidoli; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Sequence, structure, and function of the Dps DNA-binding protein from Deinococcus wulumuqiensis R12.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Zhihan Yang; Xue Zhou; Mengmeng Jin; Zijie Dai; Dengming Ming; Zhidong Zhang; Liying Zhu; Ling Jiang
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 6.352

3.  Software Options for the Analysis of MS-Proteomic Data.

Authors:  Avinash Yadav; Federica Marini; Alessandro Cuomo; Tiziana Bonaldi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  HyperQuant-A Computational Pipeline for Higher Order Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics.

Authors:  Suruchi Aggarwal; Ajay Kumar; Shilpa Jamwal; Mukul Kumar Midha; Narayan Chandra Talukdar; Amit Kumar Yadav
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-05-07

5.  Proteomic profiling and identification of significant markers from high-grade osteosarcoma after cryotherapy and irradiation.

Authors:  Rashmi Madda; Chao-Ming Chen; Jir-You Wang; Cheng-Fong Chen; Kuang-Yu Chao; Yu-Min Yang; Hsin-Yi Wu; Wei-Ming Chen; Po-Kuei Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry proteomics.

Authors:  Yisu Peng; Shantanu Jain; Yong Fuga Li; Michal Greguš; Alexander R Ivanov; Olga Vitek; Predrag Radivojac
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Dataset generated using hyperplexing and click chemistry to monitor temporal dynamics of newly synthesized macrophage secretome post infection by mycobacterial strains.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar; Shilpa Jamwal; Mukul Kumar Midha; Baseerat Hamza; Suruchi Aggarwal; Amit Kumar Yadav; Kanury V S Rao
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2016-09-05

8.  DNA methylation exploration for ARDS: a multi-omics and multi-microarray interrelated analysis.

Authors:  Shi Zhang; Zongsheng Wu; Jianfeng Xie; Yi Yang; Lei Wang; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Exploring the Proteomic Alterations from Untreated and Cryoablation and Irradiation Treated Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Using Liquid-Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Rashmi Madda; Chao-Ming Chen; Cheng-Fong Chen; Jir-You Wang; Po-Kuei Wu; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.