Literature DB >> 26518286

Perceived ease of access to alcohol, tobacco and other substances in rural and urban US students.

Jacob C Warren1, K Bryant Smalley2, K Nikki Barefoot3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ease of access to substances has been shown to have a direct and significant relationship with substance use for school-aged children. Previous research involving rural samples of middle and high school students reveals that perceived ease of access to substances is a significant predictor of recent use among rural adolescents; however, it is unclear if perceived access to substances varies between rural and urban areas. The purpose of the present study was to examine rural-urban differences in perceived ease of access to alcohol, smoking and chewing tobacco, marijuana, and seven other substances in the US state of Georgia in order to better inform and promote future substance use prevention and programming efforts in rural areas.
METHODS: Data were analyzed from the 2013 Georgia Student Health Survey II, administered in all public and interested private/charter schools in the state of Georgia. A total of 513 909 students (18.2% rural) indicated their perceived ease of access to 11 substances on a four-point Likert-type scale. Rural-urban differences were investigated using χ2 analysis.
RESULTS: In general, it appeared the rural-urban differences fell along legal/illicit lines. For middle school students, a significant difference in perceived ease of access was found for each substance, with rural students reporting greater access to smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco, and steroids, and urban students reporting greater access to alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, inhalants, ecstasy, methamphetamine, hallucinogens, and prescription drugs. Rural high school students reported higher access to alcohol, smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco, and steroids, with urban students reporting higher access to marijuana, cocaine, inhalants, ecstasy, and hallucinogens. Perceptions of ease of access more than doubled for each substance in both geographies between middle and high school.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study found multiple and fairly consistent differences between rural and urban students' perceived ease of access to a variety of substances, with rural students reporting higher levels of access to legal substances and urban students reporting higher levels of access predominantly to illicit substances. Most troubling were the high levels of perceived access to substances, particularly among high school students. Even within rural students who reported lower ease of access, more than half of students reported having at least somewhat easy access to marijuana. More than 60% of both rural and urban high school students reported easy access to alcohol. Future research should investigate ways to decrease the perceptions of access to substances in order to prevent use and abuse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol and Drug; Epidemiology; Health Promotion; North America; Public Health; Researcher; Youth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26518286      PMCID: PMC4727394     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rural Remote Health        ISSN: 1445-6354            Impact factor:   1.759


  29 in total

1.  Health risk behaviors among adolescents attending rural, suburban, and urban schools: a comparative study.

Authors:  Serdar Atav; Gale A Spencer
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2002-07

2.  Methods, locations, and ease of cigarette access for American youth, 1997-2002.

Authors:  Lloyd D Johnston; Patrick M O'malley; Yvonne M Terry-McElrath
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Alcohol environments and disparities in exposure associated with adolescent drinking in California.

Authors:  Khoa Dang Truong; Roland Sturm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Substance abuse by youth and young adults in rural America.

Authors:  David Lambert; John A Gale; David Hartley
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health.

Authors:  M D Resnick; P S Bearman; R W Blum; K E Bauman; K M Harris; J Jones; J Tabor; T Beuhring; R E Sieving; M Shew; M Ireland; L H Bearinger; J R Udry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Rural adolescent alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use: a comparison of students in Victoria, Australia, and Washington State, United States.

Authors:  Kerri Coomber; John W Toumbourou; Peter Miller; Petra K Staiger; Sheryl A Hemphill; Richard F Catalano
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Community norms, enforcement of minimum legal drinking age laws, personal beliefs and underage drinking: an explanatory model.

Authors:  Sharon Lipperman-Kreda; Joel W Grube; Mallie J Paschall
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-06

8.  The use of focus groups to compare tobacco attitudes and behaviors between youth in urban and rural settings.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Johnelle Lamarque
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2010-02-16

9.  Alcohol outlets, youth drinking, and self-reported ease of access to alcohol: a constraints and opportunities approach.

Authors:  Andrew J Treno; William R Ponicki; Lillian G Remer; Paul J Gruenewald
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Physical, social, and perceived availabilities of alcohol and last month alcohol use in rural and small urban communities.

Authors:  Linda R Stanley; Kimberly L Henry; Randall C Swaim
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2010-06-09
View more
  13 in total

1.  Rural-Urban Differences in the Decline of Adolescent Cigarette Smoking.

Authors:  Erika C Ziller; Jennifer Dunbar Lenardson; Nathan C Paluso; Jean A Talbot; Angela Daley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Association of Drug and Alcohol Use With Adolescent Firearm Homicide at Individual, Family, and Neighborhood Levels.

Authors:  Bernadette C Hohl; Shari Wiley; Douglas J Wiebe; Alison J Culyba; Rebecca Drake; Charles C Branas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Urban and Rural Adolescents' Points-of-Access for Alcohol and Tobacco.

Authors:  Ronald D Williams; Jeff M Housman; Jennifer L Evans; James M Bishop; Veronica Ray
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-04

Review 4.  Rethinking Addiction.

Authors:  D Rose Ewald; Robert W Strack; Muhsin Michael Orsini
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2019-01-23

5.  An oral cavity profile in illicit- Drug abusers?

Authors:  Muhammad Mahmoud Al Bush
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec

6.  Prevalence of, Factors Associated with and Level of Dependence of Psychoactive Substance Use among Mekelle University Students, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Azeb Gebresilassie Tesema; Znabu Hadush Kahsay; Gebrezgi Gidey Lemma; Welday Hagos Gebretsadik; Mamuye Mussie Weldemaryam; Gebrecherkos Gebregiorgis Alemayohu; Maree L Hackett
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Assessment of use of psychoactive and other non-prescription drugs among students of selected tertiary institutions in Ekiti State South West Nigeria - A baseline study.

Authors:  Rebecca O Soremekun; Oluwakemi E Omole; Oluwatosin C Adeyemi; Abayomi M Oshatimi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-26

8.  Rural disparities in adolescent smoking prevalence.

Authors:  Sooyong Kim; Arielle Selya
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Race/ethnicity differences in risk and protective factors for marijuana use among U.S. adolescents.

Authors:  Meen Hye Lee; Yeoun Soo Kim-Godwin; Hyungjo Hur
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Availability, Promotion, and Signs of Alcohol Consumption: A Mixed Methods Study of Perceived Exposure and Objective Measures.

Authors:  Andrea Pastor; Irene Molina de la Fuente; María Sandín Vázquez; Paloma Conde; Marina Bosque-Prous; Manuel Franco; Niamh Shortt; Xisca Sureda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.