Literature DB >> 26518228

Identification of a lead like inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus non-structural NS2 autoprotease.

Joseph Shaw1, Mark Harris2, Colin W G Fishwick3.   

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) non-structural protein 2 (NS2) encodes an autoprotease activity that is essential for virus replication and thus represents an attractive anti-viral target. Recently, we demonstrated that a series of epoxide-based compounds, previously identified as potent inhibitors of the clotting factor, FXIII, also inhibited NS2-mediated proteolysis in vitro and possessed anti-viral activity in cell culture models. This suggested that a selective small molecule inhibitor of the NS2 autoprotease represents a viable prospect. In this independent study, we applied a structure-guided virtual high-throughput screening approach in order to identify a lead-like small molecule inhibitor of the NS2 autoprotease. This screen identified a molecule that was able to inhibit both NS2-mediated proteolysis in vitro and NS2-dependent genome replication in a cell-based assay. A subsequent preliminary structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis shed light on the nature of the active pharmacophore in this compound and may inform further development into a more potent inhibitor of NS2 mediated proteolysis.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoprotease; Hepatitis C virus; NS2; Small molecule inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26518228      PMCID: PMC4678293          DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antiviral Res        ISSN: 0166-3542            Impact factor:   5.970


Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects 2.8% of the worldwide population, with 85% of cases progressing to chronic infection (Webster et al., 2015), associated with both liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV possesses a 9.6 kb positive sense RNA genome which encodes a single 3000 amino acid polyprotein and viral replication is absolutely dependent on proteolytic processing of this polyprotein into mature proteins. Host proteases cleave between the virion structural proteins (Core, E1 and E2), the p7 viroporin and p7-NS2 junction. Two virally-encoded protease activities complete processing of the remaining non-structural (NS) proteins NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A and NS5B. An autoprotease activity performs cleavage at the NS2-NS3 junction, while the remaining junctions are processed by the NS3 serine protease. HCV therapy has advanced rapidly with the development of direct acting anti-virals (DAAs) which target polyprotein processing or genome replication. DAAs target two virally encoded enzymes; the NS3 protease and the NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, but also NS5A (which lacks enzyme activity) through a poorly defined mode of action (Webster et al., 2015). While the success of these therapies has been encouraging to date, the long term response and potential for viral resistance remain to be seen. Until recently, the only HCV encoded enzyme activity to which small molecule inhibitors have not been reported is the autoprotease activity encoded within NS2 and responsible for cleavage at the NS2-NS3 junction. NS2 is a 23 kDa protein that in addition to autoprotease activity has an independent, albeit poorly defined, role in virus assembly (Jones et al., 2007, Ma et al., 2011, Shanmugam et al., 2015). It comprises an N-terminal transmembrane domain and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain, the latter of which contains the cysteine autoprotease activity. The enzyme activity is encoded within NS2 but is enhanced by elements from the NS3 N-terminus (Schregel et al., 2009). NS2-NS3 cleavage is essential in the virus lifecycle (Jones et al., 2007, Kolykhalov et al., 2000, Welbourn et al., 2005). Although NS2 plays no direct role in genome replication processing of NS3 from an NS2-NS3 precursor is required for an NS3-mediated function which is essential in the establishment of replication complexes (Isken et al., 2015). Due to its essential nature in the HCV lifecycle, the NS2 autoprotease represents an attractive therapeutic target (Lorenz, 2010, Rice, 2011). In this regard, we recently reported that a series of epoxide-containing small molecule inhibitors of the transglutaminase FXIII-A (Avery et al., 2015) were also able to inhibit NS2 mediated proteolysis both in vitro and in cell-based systems (Shaw et al., 2015). To further explore the potential to inhibit the HCV NS2 autoprotease a structure-guided virtual high-throughput screening approach was employed to identify a lead-like small molecule inhibitor. This molecule represents a first-in-class anti-viral agent with activity against infectious HCV in cell culture and provides evidence that inhibitors of virally encoded auto-proteases are a viable prospect.

Materials and methods

Compounds

Compounds 160 (ID: 38490315), 160–3, 160–4, 160–5, 160–6, 160–7, 160–8 and 160–9 were from ChemBridge Corporation. SM-1, SM-2 and Telaprevir were from KeyOrganics, Sigma Aldrich and MedChem Express respectively. 160–1 and 160–2 were synthesised in-house (Supplementary Materials). All compounds were confirmed using a VG Autospec mass spectrometer with electron spray ionisation (ES) at 70 eV.

In silico enrichment of screening libraries

C-terminal residues were sequentially removed from the active site cavity of the post-cleaved NS2 protease domain structure (PDB: 2HD0) using Maestro (Schrodinger) to produce the models NS2ΔP1−P2, NS2ΔP1−P5 and NS2ΔP1−P10. Virtual screening was performed using eHITS (SymBioSys) to dock and score a library of >5 × 105 commercially available lead-like molecules. Additionally, SPROUT (Gillet et al., 1994) was employed to construct models of molecules predicted to form favourable interactions. Top scoring molecules were expanded using ROCS 3.2.0.4 (OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, NM. http://www.eyesopen.com) (Hawkins et al., 2007) and filtered by favourable modelled binding pose, structural diversity and cLogP to yield a library of 200 compounds.

Screening of small molecules in vitro

NS2-NS3-FLAG (JFH-1 isolate, genotype 2a) was purified, and proteolysis reactions were performed as previously described (Shaw et al., 2015). Compounds were added to reactions prior to addition of NS2-NS3-FLAG by dilution from DMSO stocks (final DMSO 0.75%). Reactions were incubated at room temperature for 16 h, terminated by addition of Laemmli buffer and the NS3-FLAG proteolysis product quantified by western blot using M2 anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (Sigma Aldrich) and IRDye 680RD Donkey anti-Mouse (LI-COR Biosciences) on an Odyssey imager (LI-COR). NS3-FLAG was normalised to DMSO control and a non-linear regression fitted with Prism 6 (GraphPad) to determine 50% effective concentration (EC50).

Cell based screening of small molecules

Selection and maintenance of Huh7.5 cells stably harbouring SGR-feo-NS3-5B (Wyles et al., 2009, Wyles et al., 2007) or SGR-feo-NS2-5B derived from JFH-1 (genotype 2a) and Con1 (genotype 1b) has previously been reported (Shaw et al., 2015). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 IU penicillin ml−1, 100 μg streptomycin ml−1, 1% non-essential amino acids and 300 μg/ml G418 in a humidified incubator at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For screening, 2 × 104 cells/well were seeded in a 96-well plate in the absence of G418 and compounds were added to 10 μM final concentration by dilution from DMSO stocks. At 72 h, cells were washed in PBS and lysed in 30 μl/well Passive Lysis Buffer (PLB: Promega). Luciferase activity was quantified by automated addition of 40 μl LarI reagent (Promega) and light emission recorded over 6 s using a BMG Labtech Fluostar plate reader. Statistical significance was determined using the Student's t test.

Determination of effective concentrations against SGR

For transient SGR experiments, in vitro transcripts (2 μg) of firefly luciferase-containing SGR were electroporated into 4 × 106 Huh7.5 cells (Blight et al., 2002) or Huh7 cells at 950 μF and 270 V. 2 × 104 cells/well were seeded in a 96 well plate. At 4 h post electroporation (h.p.e.) media was replaced with media containing compounds. For cytotoxicity assay, media was removed and cells were incubated in 1 mM thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) for >2 h. MTT crystals were resuspended in 100 μl DMSO and absorbance at 570 nm quantified using an infinite F50 plate reader (Tecan). Alternatively, cytotoxicity was analysed using the ATPLite kit following the manufacturer's instructions, with light emission quantified using a BMG Labtech Fluostar plate reader. Firefly luciferase was measured as in Section 2.4. Data was normalised to DMSO controls and EC50/CC50 determined using Prism 6 (GraphPad).

Western blot analysis of cellular lysates

2 × 106 cells were seeded in a 10 cm dish and incubated as indicated. Cells were washed in PBS and lysed in 100 μl PLB. Clarified lysates were analysed by 15% SDS-PAGE and western blot. Anti-GAPDH (Abcam) (1:20,000) or anti-NS5A (Macdonald et al., 2003) (1:5000) were followed by IRDye 680RD Donkey anti-Mouse or IRDye 800CW Donkey anti-Rabbit (LI-COR BioSciences) (1:10,000) respectively. Imaging was performed using an Odyssey Imager (LI-COR).

Determination of effective concentrations against HCVcc

For HCVcc experiments, 5 μg of Jc1-NLuc (Amako et al., 2015) transcript was electroporated into Huh7.5 cells and treated with compound as described in Section 2.5. Cytotoxicity or NanoLuc (NLuc) activity was measured at 48 h incubation with compound. Cells were lysed as in Section 2.4. Following the addition of 50 μl/well Nano-Glo Luciferase Assay Substrate (Promega) light emission was recorded using a BMG Labtech Fluostar plate reader and data analysed as in Section 2.5.

Results

Identification of a lead-like small molecule inhibitor of the NS2 autoprotease

To explore the viability of NS2 autoprotease inhibitors as a novel class of anti-virals, we exploited the availability of a high (2.3 Å) resolution structure representing the post-cleavage NS2 autoprotease (Lorenz et al., 2006). A library of lead-like small molecules was enriched using structure-guided virtual high-throughput screening (vHTS) of >5 × 105 commercially available compounds through a combination of eHITS (Zsoldos et al., 2006) and SPROUT (Gillet et al., 1994) software packages. Structure-guided vHTS was targeted to the NS2 autoprotease structure wherein C-terminal residues were sequentially removed to expose the active site cavity (Supplementary Fig. 1). High scoring compounds with attractive lead-like properties were then screened for activity against NS2-mediated proteolysis in two independent assays. Firstly, compounds were tested for the ability to block production of a substrate product of the NS2 autoprotease in an in vitro assay. This assay, using a recombinant NS2-NS3-FLAG precursor purified under denaturing conditions, measured NS2 autoprotease activity using quantitative western blot to monitor a proteolysis product (NS3-FLAG) (Foster et al., 2010, Shaw et al., 2015, Tedbury and Harris, 2007). Additionally, compounds were tested for the ability to specifically perturb NS2-dependent HCV genome replication in a cell-based assay. Compounds were tested against cells stably harbouring a HCV sub-genomic replicon (SGR) comprising either NS2-5B or NS3-5B with a firefly luciferase-neomycin phosphotransferase reporter (Shaw et al., 2015, Wyles et al., 2009, Wyles et al., 2007). In this system, SGR-feo-NS2-5B encodes NS3 as part of an NS2-NS3 precursor within the translated polyprotein, hence genome replication is dependent on the NS2 autoprotease activity. In contrast, SGR-feo-NS3-5B lacks the NS2 coding sequence and is thus independent of NS2 autoprotease activity. The compound (2R, 3R)-3-amino-1′-[(1-methylcyclohexyl)carbonyl]-2,3,dihydrospiro[indene-1,4′-piperidine]-2-ol (termed 160 henceforth) (Fig. 1A) was identified as a ‘hit’ in both of these assays. Addition of 160 to the in vitro NS2 autoprotease assay reduced production of the NS3-FLAG product in a dose-responsive manner with an EC50 of 39 μM (Fig. 1B). In the cell-based assay, 160 also inhibited luciferase activity in cells stably harbouring SGR-feo-NS2-5B(JFH-1) with an EC50 of 43.4 μM (Fig. 1C). To confirm that the activity of 160 was not restricted to the genotype 2a JFH-1 isolate, we showed that luciferase activity in Huh7.5 cells stably harbouring the genotype 1b derived SGR-feo-NS2-5B(Con1) was significantly reduced by 160 (10 μM) relative to DMSO control, with no effect on luciferase activity from SGR-feo-NS3-5B(Con1) (Fig. 1D). Importantly therefore, 160 only reduced reporter activity when genome replication was dependent on NS2-mediated processing at the NS2-NS3 junction of the polyprotein.
Fig. 1

Identification of a lead-like inhibitor of the NS2 autoprotease. A) Chemical structure of active compound 160. B) Purified recombinant NS2-NS3-FLAG fusion protein was incubated in refolding buffer (Shaw et al., 2015) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of 160. The presence of the precursor and the NS2 proteolytic product NS3-FLAG was assayed by western blot with an anti-FLAG antibody. C) SGR-feo-NS2-5B(JFH-1) harbouring Huh7.5 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of 160 for 48 h prior to determination of luciferase activity. Cell viability was measured simultaneously by ATPLite assay. Data represent the mean ± SD of one representative experiment performed in duplicate. D) Addition of 160 (10 μM) reduces luciferase activity in SGR-feo-NS2-5B(Con1) harbouring Huh7.5 cells relative to DMSO control without affecting luciferase activity in SGR-feo-NS3-5B(Con1) harbouring cells. Data show the mean ± SD of two experiments performed in triplicate (RLU – Relative Luciferase Units). Statistical significance was determined by the Student's t test (*p = 0.0006).

To explore the requirements for activity against the NS2 autoprotease in vitro, a range of structurally similar compounds were tested, sourced from both in-house synthesis of variants, and via purchase of commercially available compounds judged to be potentially similar to compound 160 using the ROCS software. Molecules 160–1 and 160–2 were synthesised in-house (for details see supplementary material), while 160–3 to 160–9, SM-1 and SM-2 were commercially available. Compounds were tested for activity against the NS2 autoprotease in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 2). Active compounds had no effect on production of the NS3-FLAG proteolysis product when added after the proteolysis reaction was complete (data not shown), confirming that they acted to inhibit proteolysis rather than affecting NS3-FLAG detection by western blot. As summarised in Table 1, we were able to establish some preliminary structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis from the small library of molecules that were screened. Thus, activity of 160 against the NS2 autoprotease in vitro did not require the presence of the primary alcohol and amine groups at the stereocentres of the indene core in 160. However, activity was found to be crucially dependent on the presence of the cyclohexane portion in 160 and is enhanced by the presence of a 1-(methylcyclohexyl) moiety as in 160 and 160–1. This would indicate that, whilst hydrophobic interactions between this portion of the inhibitor and protein would appear to be important, there is also a requirement for shape complementarity. These observations begin to map the features of 160 which contribute to activity against the NS2 autoprotease.
Table 1

Structure activity relationship analysis of 160. EC50 calculated from 10-point dose response treatment of JFH-1 NS2-3 in vitro proteolysis reactions (Supplementary Fig. 2).* Mean ± SD of three experimental repeats.

CompoundStructureJFH1 NS2-3 EC50 (μM)
16044.6 ± 6.2 *
160–143.0 ± 0.5 *
160–268.4 ± 5.6 *
160–3>300
160–4>300
160–5>300
160–6>300
160–7>300
160–8>300
160–9>300
SM-1>300
SM-2>300

Activity of 160 against a transient NS2-5B SGR

Inhibition of both NS2-mediated proteolysis in vitro (Fig. 1B), and NS2-dependent HCV genome replication in a cell based assay (Fig. 1C) by 160 exhibited similar EC50 values (39/43.4 μM respectively). We considered that the relatively low efficacy of 160 in the cell-based assay might be due to the fact that these cells had been selected to harbour a stable SGR and thus they contained pre-existing, replication complexes whose activity would not be dependent on NS2-3 cleavage. To test this we performed a transient replication assay in which in vitro transcripts of a JFH-1 derived luciferase-containing SGR (SGR-luc-NS2-5B(JFH-1)) (Tedbury et al., 2011) were electroporated into the HCV permissive Huh7.5 cell line (Blight et al., 2002) and treated for 48 h with a range of concentrations of 160. Cytotoxicity was quantified by MTT assay and replication assayed by measuring luciferase activity. A representative assay is presented (Fig. 2A), demonstrating that treatment with 160 produced a dose responsive reduction in luciferase activity. Over four biological replicates (Fig. 2D) 160 did indeed exhibit an improved EC50 of 12.0 ± 6.4 μM, compared to the activity observed in the stable SGR-harbouring cells. At higher concentrations of 160, some cytotoxic effects were observed (Fig. 2A, D). However, due to the limitation in the achievable concentration of 160 and derivatives (300 μM), it was not possible to calculate an accurate CC50 value, although the data indicate a selectivity index of >5.
Fig. 2

Activity of 160 and analogues against NS2-dependent genome replication. SGR-luc-NS2-5B(JFH-1) RNA was electroporated into Huh7.5 cells which were treated with indicated concentrations of 160 (A) or the inactive derivatives 160–3 (B) or 160–4 (C) at 4 h.p.e. At 48 h.p.e cell viability was quantified by MTT assay and luciferase activity was measured and plotted relative to DMSO control. Data represent the mean ± SD of one representative experiment performed in duplicate. (D) EC50 and CC50 for indicated compounds determined across several experimental repeats. Additional primary data is presented in Supplementary Fig. 3. Mean ± SD are reported.

In contrast, 160–3 and 160–4, derivatives inactive against the NS2 autoprotease in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 2), did not exhibit any specific effect against replication. For 160–3 luciferase activity closely correlated with the degree of cytotoxicity indicating a lack of any specific effect on SGR genome replication (Fig. 2B, D). In contrast 160–4 had no cytotoxicity or effect on luciferase activity up to 200 μM (Fig. 2C, D). To confirm an inhibitory effect of 160 against NS2-dependent genome replication in the absence of cytotoxic effects, SGR-luc-NS2-5B(JFH-1) electroporated cells were treated with a concentration of 160 (25 μM) that had no observed cytotoxicity as measured either by MTT (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. 3), or ATPlite assay (Fig. 3A). 160 was added 4 h.p.e and luciferase activity was monitored every 4 h for a further 48 h. Addition of 160 led to a reduction in luciferase activity and a lag in detectable luciferase activity relative to DMSO control (Fig. 3B). Addition of an intermediate concentration (100 nM) of Telaprevir produced a comparable profile.
Fig. 3

160 inhibits replication of a NS2-5B sub-genomic replicon in the absence of cytotoxicity. A) Huh7.5 cells treated with DMSO control or an EC50 concentration of 160 (25 μM) for 48 h before quantifying viable cells using the ATPLite assay. Data is normalised to DMSO control and represents the mean ± SD of three experimental repeats performed in triplicate. B) SGR-luc-NS2-5B(JFH-1) or a polymerase defective control (GND) were electroporated into Huh7.5 cells prior to treatment with DMSO control, 160 (25 μM) or Telaprevir (100 nM) and assay for luciferase activity at the indicated time points. Data represent the mean ± SD of two experimental repeats performed in triplicate. Statistical significance was determined by the Student's t test (***p ≤ 0.0001, **p ≤ 0.0002, *p ≤ 0.0023). C) Cell lysates from B at 52 h.p.e. were analysed for NS5A and GAPDH by western blot.

Cell lysates at 52 h.p.e were analysed by western blot for NS5A and GAPDH. Both 160 and Telaprevir caused a comparable reduction in NS5A relative to DMSO control (Fig. 3C). These results demonstrate that 160 inhibits NS2-dependent HCV genome replication in the absence of cytotoxicity.

160 exhibited anti-viral activity

We next assessed the antiviral activity of 160 in an infectious system, using a derivative of the genotype 2a chimeric Jc1 construct that encodes a Nano-luciferase reporter (Jc1-NLuc) (Amako et al., 2015). Jc1-NLuc RNA was electroporated into Huh7.5 cells and treated with 160 from 4 to 48 h.p.e. Three biological replicates of this experiment are shown in Fig. 4 and demonstrate that 160 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in NLuc reporter activity with an EC50 of 17.3 ± 8.1 μM that was comparable to that observed against SGR (Fig. 4A). Cytotoxicity of 160 was simultaneously assessed by MTT assay (Fig. 4B) and was comparable to that observed in SGR (Fig. 2). These findings demonstrate that the small molecule 160, which blocks NS2-NS3 processing in vitro, can function as an anti-viral compound.
Fig. 4

Anti-viral activity of 160. Jc1-NLuc RNA was electroporated into Huh7.5 cells and treated with a range of concentrations of 160. A) 48 h.p.e. NLuc activity was quantified to assess anti-viral effects. B) 48 h.p.e cellular metabolism was quantified by MTT assay (Cell viability, MTT). Data is normalised to DMSO control with the mean ± SD of three experiments performed in duplicate shown. Mean EC50 = 17.3 ± 8.1 μM. Mean CC50 = 109.8 ± 40.0 μM.

Discussion

Recent advances in all-oral, interferon-free HCV therapeutic regimes have involved the use of DAAs targeting HCV-encoded enzyme activities; namely inhibitors targeting NS3/4A protease and NS5B RNA polymerase. Small molecule inhibitors of the NS3 helicase have also been reported but remain in pre-clinical stages. Thus the only HCV-encoded enzyme activity which has not been targeted with DAAs is the protease activity encoded within the C-terminus of NS2. We report the identification of a lead-like small compound, 160, which blocks NS2-mediated proteolysis at the NS2-NS3 junction in vitro. SAR analysis has begun to inform on the active pharmacophore of this series: 160, and its active analogues 160–1 and 160–2, represent an interesting chemotype that could be expanded to explore additional, more potent, inhibitors of NS2-mediated proteolysis. Treatment with 160 reduced reporter activity in a SGR system where genome replication was dependent on NS2 autoprotease activity (SGR-NS2-5B) without affecting reporter activity in a SGR system that lacks NS2 (SGR-NS3-5B) (Fig. 1B). The EC50 of 160 against SGR-NS2-5B was 12.0 ± 6.4 μM (Fig. 2D), an improved potency compared to previously reported NS2 inhibitors (Shaw et al., 2015). Importantly, 160 also inhibited viral replication in the context of infectious virus, reducing reporter activity at concentrations where cellular metabolism remains unaffected (Fig. 4). The activity of 160 had a narrow selectivity index (>5), as modest cytotoxic effects were observed at ≥ 95 μM and at the maximal attainable concentration (300 μM), cell viability was reduced to 40%. However, at an intermediate concentration of 160 (25 μM) both reporter activity and NS5A expression were reduced in the absence of detectable cytotoxicity (Fig. 3). Furthermore, SAR demonstrated that the derivatives 160–3 and 160–4 were inactive in both the in vitro NS2 autoprotease and cell-based NS2-dependent replication assays. 160–3 only showed reduced reporter activity at ≥ 95 μM which correlated with decreased cellular metabolism, hence the compound possessed no selective anti-viral activity. This suggests that a hydrophobic group in place of the 1-methyl cyclohexane portion of 160 was associated with cytotoxicity. However, while both an isopropyl or 1-methyl substituted cyclohexane at this position are responsible for cytotoxic effects, only a 1-methyl cyclohexane moiety imparts activity against NS2-mediated proteolysis in vitro and against NS2-dependent HCV genome replication. Further modifications to this region may help to increase the selectivity index of future compounds. In conclusion, our study has identified a small molecule (160) that selectively inhibits the cleavage of the NS2-3 precursor. Although the potency of 160 is not sufficient to impact on current therapeutic regimes, it provides a starting point for further development, and importantly also represents proof of principle that this proteolytic cleavage is a valid and tractable target for future antiviral strategies to enhance the breadth of HCV therapies.
  24 in total

1.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  SPROUT: recent developments in the de novo design of molecules.

Authors:  V J Gillet; W Newell; P Mata; G Myatt; S Sike; Z Zsoldos; A P Johnson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

3.  Hepatitis C virus NS2 protein serves as a scaffold for virus assembly by interacting with both structural and nonstructural proteins.

Authors:  Yinghong Ma; Manu Anantpadma; Jennifer M Timpe; Saravanabalaji Shanmugam; Sher M Singh; Stanley M Lemon; Minkyung Yi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Structure of the catalytic domain of the hepatitis C virus NS2-3 protease.

Authors:  Ivo C Lorenz; Joseph Marcotrigiano; Thomas G Dentzer; Charles M Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The octadecyloxyethyl ester of (S)-9-[3-hydroxy-2-(phosphonomethoxy) propyl]adenine is a potent and selective inhibitor of hepatitis C virus replication in genotype 1A, 1B, and 2A replicons.

Authors:  David L Wyles; Kelly A Kaihara; Brent E Korba; Robert T Schooley; James R Beadle; Karl Y Hostetler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Hepatitis C virus-encoded enzymatic activities and conserved RNA elements in the 3' nontranslated region are essential for virus replication in vivo.

Authors:  A A Kolykhalov; K Mihalik; S M Feinstone; C M Rice
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  The hepatitis C virus non-structural NS5A protein inhibits activating protein-1 function by perturbing ras-ERK pathway signaling.

Authors:  Andrew Macdonald; Katherine Crowder; Andrew Street; Christopher McCormick; Kalle Saksela; Mark Harris
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The subcellular localization of the hepatitis C virus non-structural protein NS2 is regulated by an ion channel-independent function of the p7 protein.

Authors:  Philip Tedbury; Sarah Welbourn; Arnim Pause; Barnabas King; Stephen Griffin; Mark Harris
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.891

9.  Epoxide based inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus non-structural 2 autoprotease.

Authors:  Joseph Shaw; Colin W G Fishwick; Mark Harris
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.970

10.  A conserved NS3 surface patch orchestrates NS2 protease stimulation, NS5A hyperphosphorylation and HCV genome replication.

Authors:  Olaf Isken; Ulrike Langerwisch; Vlastimil Jirasko; Dirk Rehders; Lars Redecke; Harish Ramanathan; Brett D Lindenbach; Ralf Bartenschlager; Norbert Tautz
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Overview of HCV Life Cycle with a Special Focus on Current and Possible Future Antiviral Targets.

Authors:  Nathalie Alazard-Dany; Solène Denolly; Bertrand Boson; François-Loïc Cosset
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 5.048

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.