| Literature DB >> 26517910 |
Alison Baker1, David J Carrier2, Theresia Schaedler3, Hans R Waterham4, Carlo W van Roermund4, Frederica L Theodoulou.
Abstract
Peroxisomes are arguably the most biochemically versatile of all eukaryotic organelles. Their metabolic functions vary between different organisms, between different tissue types of the same organism and even between different developmental stages or in response to changed environmental conditions. New functions for peroxisomes are still being discovered and their importance is underscored by the severe phenotypes that can arise as a result of peroxisome dysfunction. The β-oxidation pathway is central to peroxisomal metabolism, but the substrates processed are very diverse, reflecting the diversity of peroxisomes across species. Substrates for β-oxidation enter peroxisomes via ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters of subfamily D; (ABCD) and are activated by specific acyl CoA synthetases for further metabolism. Humans have three peroxisomal ABCD family members, which are half transporters that homodimerize and have distinct but partially overlapping substrate specificity; Saccharomyces cerevisiae has two half transporters that heterodimerize and plants have a single peroxisomal ABC transporter that is a fused heterodimer and which appears to be the single entry point into peroxisomes for a very wide variety of β-oxidation substrates. Our studies suggest that the Arabidopsis peroxisomal ABC transporter AtABCD1 accepts acyl CoA substrates, cleaves them before or during transport followed by reactivation by peroxisomal synthetases. We propose that this is a general mechanism to provide specificity to this class of transporters and by which amphipathic compounds are moved across peroxisome membranes.Entities:
Keywords: ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter; acyl-CoA; asymmetry; peroxisome; thioesterase; β-oxidation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26517910 PMCID: PMC4652930 DOI: 10.1042/BST20150127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Soc Trans ISSN: 0300-5127 Impact factor: 5.407
Figure 1Molecular models showing putative inward and outward conformations of Arabidopsis CTS
Models of CTS are based on the structures of (A) ABCB10 [52], with bound AMP–PCP (β,γ-methylene adenosine 5′-triphosphate) (green spheres) in an inward-facing conformation [2YL4.pdb replaced in database by 4AYT.pdb; the two structures can be superimposed with a RMSD of 0.19 Å (1 Å=0.1 nm)] and (B) Sav1866 [53] open-outward ADP-bound complex in which the two NBDs (blue and purple) are closely packed with two nucleotides (green spheres), sandwiched between them (2HYD.pdb). The NBDs face the cytosol [39], views are from side-on (top image) and bottom-up (bottom image) and an angled view to show the pore, the possible site of substrate release, created in the open conformation. Note the domain swapping where TMD2 (yellow) contacts NBD1 (blue) and TMD1 (green) contacts NBD2 (purple).
Figure 2Proposed transport mechanism for CTS
Fatty acids are released from oil body stores of triacylglycerol by lipolysis. Cytosolic or microsomal acyl CoA synthetases activate non-esterified fatty acids to the corresponding acyl-CoA esters. CTS accepts acyl-CoAs; once bound, the intrinsic thioesterase activity of the transporter releases fatty acids which may be flip-flopped in the membrane and released into the peroxisome, where they are re-esterified by the activity of LACS6 and 7. A pool of LACS6/7 protein is physically associated with CTS on the lumenal side of the membrane [45] and ATP for the activation reaction is provided by peroxisomal adenine nucleotide carriers PNC1/2. The CoA moiety is thought to be imported into the peroxisome via the ABC transporter or alternatively may be released into the cytosol.
Figure 3Molecular model showing asymmetry in the two nucleotide binding sites of CTS
(A) Nucleotide binding between the Walker A (cyan), Walker B (blue) and H-loops (orange) motifs of NBD2 (dark grey) and the signature motif (purple) of NBD1 (light grey). (B) In the wild-type protein, the upper site is formed from the signature motif of NBD1 and the Walker motifs and H loop of NBD2 and the lower site is formed from the Walker motifs and H loop of NBD1 and the signature motif of NBD2. In the upper site, the conserved H of the H loop is replaced by Q leading to a degenerate site whereas the lower site has all the consensus amino acids. Mutation of the Walker B aspartate (D606N) in NBD1 leads to two degenerate sites and loss of function whereas the equivalent mutation in NBD2 (D1276N) still retains one consensus site and is functional [48].