Literature DB >> 26517784

Estimating annual medical and out-of-pocket expenditures associated with traumatic injuries in the United States.

Suliman Alghnam1, David J Vanness, Darrell J Gaskin, Roland J Thorpe, Renan Castillo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Every year, as many as 31 million Americans sustain traumatic injuries, leaving survivors with risks of disabilities and health settings with staggering medical costs. Little is known on the societal burden of injuries in terms of medical and out-of-pocket expenditures. Therefore, we used a nationally representative sample to evaluate the association between injuries and health expenditures among a nationally representative US sample.
METHODS: This study used years 2006 to 2010 (Panels 11-14; n = 53,065) of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Each panel was followed up for 2 years. Total expenditures included insurance payments and out-of-pocket costs. Two-part models were constructed to examine differences in annual medical expenditures between injured and noninjured populations controlling for confounding effects.
RESULTS: A total of 4,210 individuals (7.9%) reported injuries representing 21.5 million individuals. Injured individuals were more likely to be males, to be white, and to report higher medical expenditures in the second year than the reference population (p < 0.01). Adjusted analyses showed that reporting any injury was associated with $2,577 (95% confidence interval [CI], $2,049-$3,103) and $186 (95% CI, $142-$230) increase in total and out-of-pocket costs, respectively. While a moderate or severe injury was associated with $4,779 (95% CI, $3,947-$5,610) increase in the average of medical expenditures and $256 (95% CI, $190-$322) increase in out-of-pocket costs adjusting for covariates. Our adjusted national medical cost of injuries was estimated at $56 billion and out-of-pocket cost to be approximately $4 billion.
CONCLUSION: Injuries pose a substantial burden on medical expenditures in the United States. Investment in injury prevention can facilitate reducing medical expenditures and save resources. Prevention programs may use the out-of-pocket findings to highlight injury burden on individual's prosperity and thus facilitate engagement of the public in prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and evaluation study, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26517784     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  3 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the PROPPR trial transfusion protocols.

Authors:  Rachael A Callcut; Kit N Simpson; Sarah Baraniuk; Erin E Fox; Barbara C Tilley; John B Holcomb
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  The burden of the current curative expenditure of injury in Dalian, China-a study based on the "system of health accounts 2011".

Authors:  Shu Sun; Liuna Yang; Xinzhu Hu; Yalan Zhu; Boxi Liu; Yunbin Yang; Xin Wang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  A Population-Based Study of the Incidence, Medical Care, and Medical Expenditures for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jiabin Shen; Junxin Shi; Jennifer Cooper; Cheng Chen; H Gerry Taylor; Henry Xiang
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.417

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.