Literature DB >> 26517500

Osteoporosis Diagnosis and Management in Long-Term Care Facility.

Erwin A Aguilar1, Sean D Barry, Charles A Cefalu, Abir Abdo, William P Hudson, James S Campbell, Thomas M Reske, Machaon Bonafede, Kathleen Wilson, Bradley S Stolshek, Carly J Paoli, Nguyet Tran, Lung-I Cheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contemporary estimates of the prevalence of diagnosed osteoporosis among long-term care facility residents are limited.
METHODS: This chart review collected data between April 1, 2012 and August 31, 2013 for adult (age ≥ 30 years) residents of 11 long-term care facilities affiliated with the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in the New Orleans metropolitan area. Data (demographics; comorbidities; osteoporosis diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostic assessments, treatments; fracture history; fall risk; activities of daily living) were summarized. Data for residents with and without diagnosed osteoporosis were compared using χ tests and t tests.
RESULTS: The study included 746 residents (69% women, mean [SD] age: 76.3 [13.9] years, median length of stay approximately 18.5 months). An osteoporosis diagnosis was recorded for 132 residents (18%), 30% of whom received a pharmacologic osteoporosis therapy. Fewer than 2% of residents had bone mineral density assessments; 10% had previous fracture. Calcium and vitamin D use was more prevalent in residents with diagnosed osteoporosis compared with other residents (calcium: 49% versus 12%, vitamin D: 52% versus 28%; both P < 0.001). Over half (304/545) of assessed residents had a high fall risk. Activities of daily living were similarly limited regardless of osteoporosis status.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of diagnosed osteoporosis was higher than previously reported for long-term care residents, but lower than epidemiologic estimates of osteoporosis prevalence for the noninstitutional U.S. POPULATION: In our sample, osteoporosis diagnostic testing was rare and treatment rates were low. Our results suggest that osteoporosis may be underdiagnosed and undertreated in long-term care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26517500     DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  5 in total

1.  Overwhelming Underuse of Bisphosphonates in French Nursing Home Residents After Proximal Femoral Fracture.

Authors:  P Le Floch; P Kermarrec; A Gentric
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Vitamin D and Bone Health of Older Adults within Care Homes: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Orlagh Feehan; David J Armstrong; Pamela J Magee; Kirsty L Pourshahidi; J J Strain; Laura Beggan; Diego F Cobice; Emeir M McSorley
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Treatment of Osteoporosis in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities: Update on Consensus Recommendations for Fracture Prevention.

Authors:  Gustavo Duque; Stephen R Lord; Jenson Mak; Kirtan Ganda; Jacqueline J T Close; Peter Ebeling; Alexandra Papaioannou; Charles A Inderjeeth
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.669

4.  Are Nursing Home Residents With Dementia Appropriately Treated for Fracture Prevention?

Authors:  Joshua D Niznik; Xintong Li; Meredith A Gilliam; Laura C Hanson; Sherrie L Aspinall; Cathleen Colon-Emeric; Carolyn T Thorpe
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 7.802

5.  Mapping Bone Marrow Cell Response from Senile Female Rats on Ca-P-Doped Titanium Coating.

Authors:  Leonardo P Faverani; William P P Silva; Cecília Alves de Sousa; Gileade Freitas; Ana Paula F Bassi; Jamil A Shibli; Valentim A R Barão; Adalberto L Rosa; Cortino Sukotjo; Wirley G Assunção
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.